1 On “pedigree history” see Raymond Geuss, Morality, Culture, and History. Essays On German Philosophy 1-5 (1999).Google Scholar

2 Joerges, Christian, Europe as Großraum? Shifting Legal Conceptualisations of the Integration Project, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions 167, 169 (Christian Joerges & Navraj Singh Ghaleigh eds., 2003).Google Scholar

3 Lepsius, Oliver, The Problem of Perceptions of National Socialist Law or: Was there a Constitutional Theory of National Socialism, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions supra note 2, at 19, 20.Google Scholar

4 Id., 39.Google Scholar

5 See e.g. Pier Giuseppe Monateri and Alessandro Somma, The Fascist Legal Theory of Contract, 55, 61-63 and James Q Whitman, On Nazi ‘Honour’ and the New European ‘Dignity’, 243, 251-264, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2.Google Scholar

6 Monateri, see and Somma, , supra note 5, at 59.Google Scholar

7 Agustìn José Menéndez, From Republicanism to Fascist ideology under the Early Franquismo, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 337, 341n11.Google Scholar

8 Compare Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology To Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument (1989).Google Scholar

9 Lepsius, , supra note 3.Google Scholar

10 See also William E. Scheuerman, Between The Norm And The Exception. Frankfurt School And The Rule Of Law, 34, 145-147 (1997) and passim.Google Scholar

11 Torre, Massimo La, The German Impact on Fascist Public Law Doctrine – Constantino Mortati's Material Constitution, in Darker Legacies Of Law In Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 305, 307, 319.Google Scholar

12 Monateri, and Somma, , supra note 5, at 62.Google Scholar

13 It may be suggested that a distinction should be made between rampant, all-absorbing, totalitarian deformalization and the type of technical deformalization witnessed in late liberal modernity. But I find that this rather reflects contemporary distinctions between “normal” and “exceptional” (or perhaps “transitional”) moments in the legal system. I suppose many people would be inclined to characterise the scaling down of public law and public administration in order to bring in the liberal market in the former socialist countries, for instance, precisely in terms of this type of deformalization.Google Scholar

14 See for example Roberto Unger, Law in Modern Society 198-223 (1986).Google Scholar

15 Cananea, Giacinto Della, Mortati and the Science of Public Law: A Comment on La Torre, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 321, 323.Google Scholar

16 See e.g. Hans Morgenthau, Scientific Man vs. Power Policy (1946).Google Scholar

17 See e.g. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Good Reasons For Going Around The UN, N.Y. Times, 18 March 2003.Google Scholar

18 Lepsius, , supra note 3, 35.Google Scholar

19 Joerges, , supra note 2, 175.Google Scholar

20 Stolleis, Michael, Prologue: Reluctance to Glance in the Mirror. The Changing Face of German Jurisprudence after 1933 and post-1945, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 1, 4.Google Scholar

21 Fraser, David, 'The outsider does not see all the game…': Perceptions of German Law in Anglo-American Legal Scholarship, 1933-1940, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 87, 91.Google Scholar

22 Lustgarten, Laurence, 'A Distorted Image of Ourselves': Nazism, ‘Liberal’ Societies and the Qualities of Difference, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 113, 118–127.Google Scholar

23 Whitman, James Q, On Nazi ‘Honour’ and the new European ‘Dignity’ in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 243, 254.Google Scholar

24 See especially Skinner, Quentin, Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas, in Visions of Politics Vol. I, at 57-89 (2003).Google Scholar

25 Lustgarten supra note 22, 127.Google Scholar

26 See Carl Schmitt-Dorotic, Die Diktatur: Von Den Anfängen Des Modernen Souveränitätsgedankens Bis Zum Proletarischen Klassenkampf (1928).Google Scholar

27 Mahlmann, Matthias, Judicial Methodology and Fascist and Nazi Law, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 229, 232–235.Google Scholar

28 McCormick, John P., Carl Schmitt's Europe: Cultural, Imperial and Spatial, Proposals for European Integration, 1923-1955, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 133, 141.Google Scholar

29 Joerges, , supra note 2, 171.Google Scholar

30 Especially McCormick (note 28), 140, 141.Google Scholar

31 Burgess, Especially Peter, Culture and the Rationality of Law from Weimar to Maastricht, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 143, 160–163.Google Scholar

32 Carl Schmitt, Der Nomos Der Erde Des Jus Publicum Europaeum (1950).Google Scholar

33 Burgess, , supra note 31, 151.Google Scholar

34 Id., 143-166.Google Scholar

35 Jordan, William Chester, “Europe” in the Middle Ages, in: The Idea of Europe. From Antiquity to the European Union, 72-90 (Anthony Pagden ed., 2002).Google Scholar

36 Schmitt, See Carl, Der neue Nomos der Erde, in Staat, Grossraum, Nomos. Arbeiten Aus Den Jahren 1916-1969, 518-522 (1995).Google Scholar

37 Joerges, , supra note 2, 168–191.Google Scholar

38 Walker, Neil, From Großraum to Condominium – A Comment, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 193, 202.Google Scholar

39 Never mind that the cost might not be too great, and soon offset by a working Third World economy. See Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights, 18-20, 96-100 (2002).Google Scholar

40 Burgess, , supra note 31, 160–166.Google Scholar

41 But I have dealt with it in my The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960, 480-509 (2002).Google Scholar

42 Stolleis, , supra note 20, 6.Google Scholar

43 Somek, Alexander, Authoritarian Constitutionalism: Austrian Constitutional Doctrine 1933 to 1938 and its Legacy, in Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions, supra note 2, at 361, 383.Google Scholar

44 Id., 386Google Scholar

45 Zygmut Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust (1989): “The more rational is the organization of action, the easier it is to cause suffering – and remaining in peace with oneself” (155).Google Scholar

46 Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (1984).Google Scholar

47 See especially Shklar, Judith, The Liberalism of Fear, in Political Thought and Political Thinkers, 3-20 (1998).Google Scholar

48 Mahlmann, , supra note 27, 239.Google Scholar

49 Walker, , supra note 38, 202.Google Scholar

50 Tzvetan Todorov, Memoire De La Mal, Tentation Du Bien. Enquete Sur Le Siecle (2000).Google Scholar