No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Brexit. Or, Is the European Union Educable?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
In an essay from 1998 the comparative law scholar Pierre Legrand asked the question “are civilians educable?” It was a theme that had preoccupied him for some years as he agonized over what he regarded as the intolerant, totalizing, and normalizing manner in which civilian legal systems and their acolytes encounter other legal traditions. He had documented, for example, the ways in which Quebec's new 1994 Civil Code constructively sought to suppress and exclude the significant and historically relevant Anglophone community in Quebec. Legrand argued that this domineering posture is a product of the civil law's cosmological and autarkic mentality. “The difficulty,” Legrand lamented, “is that the civil law mind … is reflexively imperialistic … because of its penchant for universalization.” Far more than his disquiet over the precarious future of Quebec's Anglophone community, Legrand came to be concerned about the fate of the English common law tradition in the face of the European Union's convergence agenda. This was, to Legrand's mind, an apocalyptic confrontation between England's still-proud legal culture and Europe's horsemen of convergence: the ECJ, the Commission, the Parliament. With increasing distress Legrand turned his attention to the way in which the European Community (and later the Union) “is liable to achieve … the marginalization of one of the subcultures that have defined western Europe historically.” He would go on to insist that “European legal systems are not converging” and to raise ever-more strident objections to the idea of a European civil code. This would not cease until Legrand had written “Antivonbar,” an incendiary manifesto aimed at salvaging the English common law from what he viewed as the Union's closed-fisted and violent politics of supremacy, which had taken the form of the proposed European Civil Code.
- Type
- Brexit Special Supplement
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2016 by German Law Journal, Inc.
References
1 Pierre Legrand, Are Civilians Educable?, 18 Legal Studies 216 (1998).Google Scholar
2 Pierre Legrand, Civil Codes and the Case of Quebec: Semiotic Musings Around an Ancient Aigu, in Conscience, Consensus, & Crossroad in law 195 (Roberta Kevelson ed., 1995).Google Scholar
3 Id. Google Scholar
4 Legrand, supra note 1, at 226.Google Scholar
5 Pierre Legrand, Codification and Politics of Exclusion: A Challenge for Comparativists, 31 U.C. Davis law Review 799, 803 (1998).Google Scholar
6 Pierre Legrand, Against a European Civil Code, 60 Modern law Review 44 (1997).Google Scholar
7 Pierre Legrand, Antivonbar, 1 Journal of Comparative Law 13 (2006).Google Scholar
8 Id. at 25.Google Scholar
9 Legrand, supra note 1, at 228.Google Scholar
10 Id. (quoting Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics 32 (1962)).Google Scholar
11 See, e.g., John Henry Merryman & Rogelio Pérerz- Pérdomo, The Civil Law Tradition 1 (3rd ed. 2007).Google Scholar
12 Pierre Legrand, Public Law, Europeanisation, and Convergence: Can Comparatists Contribute?, in Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law 225, 252 (2002).Google Scholar
13 Legrand, supra note 1, at 228.Google Scholar
14 Id. at 229. See Merryman & Pérerz- Perdomo, supra note 10, at 3. But see Porta, Rafael La, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Schleier & Robert Vishny, Law and Finance, 106 Journal of Political Economy 1113 (1998); Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, & Andrei Shleifer, The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins, 46 Journal of Economic Literature 285 (2008). Contra Ralf Michaels, Comparative Law by Numbers? Legal Origins Thesis, Doing Business Reports, and the Silence of Traditional Comparative Law, 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 765 (2009).Google Scholar
15 Legrand, supra note 1, at 228. Comparative lawyers may have an outsized role in the European project. See, e.g., Lenaerts, Koen, Interlocking Legal Orders in the European Union and Comparative Law, 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 873 (2003).Google Scholar
16 Id. at 229.Google Scholar
17 Id.Google Scholar
18 Id.Google Scholar
19 Id. at 230.Google Scholar
20 See, e.g., Article 4(2), Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, October 26, 2012, O.J. (C 326/01) (“The Union shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government.”).Google Scholar
21 See, e.g., Article 1, Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, October 26, 2012, O.J. (C 326/01).Google Scholar
22 Remember Article 4(2) of the Consolidated Treaties?Google Scholar
23 Legrand, supra note 1, at 229 (quoting James Tully, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity 197 (1995).Google Scholar
24 Karlyn Bowman et al., Polls on Patriotism, American Enterprise Institute 22–23 (June 2015), available at https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Bowman_Public-Opinion-Study_Patriotism_2015.pdf.Google Scholar
25 Id.Google Scholar
26 See Country Comparison – Population, CIA World Factbook, available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2119rank.html Google Scholar
27 Id.Google Scholar
28 Fifty-six percent of Americans are “very proud” of their country (out of a population of 300 million). Fity-six percent of Indonesians are “very proud” of their country (out of a population of 235 million).Google Scholar
29 Liqing Li, China's Rising Nationalism and Its Forefront: Politically Apathetic Youth, 51 China Report 311, 312 (2015) (citing a number of studies).Google Scholar
30 Bowman, supra note 23.Google Scholar
31 Slovenia (49%), Romania (43%), Hungary (43%), Italy (41%), Sweden (40%), Bulgaria (39%), France (28%), Germany (24%), Estonia (21%), and the Netherlands (21%). See Bowman, supra note 23.Google Scholar
32 Spain (55%). See Bowman, supra note 23.Google Scholar
33 See Smith, Tom W. & Seokho Kim, National Pride in Comparative Perspective: 1995/96 and 2003/04, 18 International Journal of Public Opinion Research 127, 129 (2006).Google Scholar
34 Legrand, supra note 1, at 225.Google Scholar
35 Id. Legrand argued that “it is a mistake to underestimate the constitutive links between individual welfare … and implication in cultural forms, including law, which are recognizable by participants (and which are recognized by others) as being theirs.” Id. at 226.Google Scholar
36 Id. at 222.Google Scholar
37 Id. at 216.Google Scholar
38 Id. at 217.Google Scholar
39 Id. at 226 (citing I. Marion Young, Justice and the Politics of Difference 59 (1990)).Google Scholar
40 See, e.g., Special Issue – Confronting Memories: European “Bitter Experiences” and the Constitutionalization Process: Constructing Europe in the Shadow of its Pasts, 6 German law Journal 245–512 (2005); Special Issue – European Integration in the Shadow of The “Darker Legacies of Law in Europe” Europe's Darker Pasts Revisited, 7 German Law Journal 71-256 (2006).Google Scholar
41 Legrand, supra note 7, at 25.Google Scholar
42 Legrand, supra note 1, at 227 (citing Merryman, J.H., On the Convergence (and Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law, in New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe 232 (M. Cappelletti ed., 1978).Google Scholar
43 Id. at 230.Google Scholar
44 Legrand, supra note 7, at 35 (quoting Driver, T.F., Beckett by the Madeleine, 4 Columbia University Forum 23 (1961)).Google Scholar
You have
Access