Article contents
Beyond the Binary: Towards a Third Sex Category in Germany?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Abstract
This Case Note discusses the recent judgment of the German Constitutional Court (1 BvR 2019/16) requiring either the legal recognition of sex categories beyond male or female, or the aboltion of sex registration requirements. The Note considers the Court's decision within the broader constitutional case law on gender identity, and explores both the progressive potential, and the future—perhaps unforeseen—consequences, of the ruling. The Case Note proceeds in three sections. Section A introduces the facts of the constitutional challenge, and sets out both the submissions of the complainant, as well as the reasoning of the Constitutional Court. In Section B, the Case Note explores the domestic law novelty of the decision, placing particular emphasis on the application of a constitutional equality framework to persons who experience intersex variance. Finally, in Section C, the Case Note contextualizes the judgment, situating the reasoning of the Constitutional Court within wider movements for transgender—otherwise known as trans—and intersex rights.
- Type
- Developments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 by German Law Journal, Inc.
References
1 Transgender or trans is an umbrella terms which refers to a person who does not self-identify with the legal sex that was assigned to them at birth.Google Scholar
2 See, e.g., Nandi, Jacinta, Germany Got It Right by Offering a Third Gender Option on Birth Certificates, The Guardian (Nov. 10, 2013), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/10/germany-third-gender-birth-certificate; Friederike Heine, ‘Third Gender’ Official in Germany from November, Spiegel Online (Aug. 16, 2013), http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/third-gender-option-to-become-available-on-german-birth-certificates-a-916940.html; Germany to Become First European State to Allow ‘Third Gender’ Birth Certificates, RT (Aug. 17, 2013), https://www.rt.com/news/third-gender-birth-germany-592/; Amanda Scherker, Germany To Offer Third Gender Option On Birth Certificates, Huffington Post (Aug. 17, 2018), www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/germany-third-gender_n_3769055. According to the (former) Intersex Society of North America, “intersex” “is a general term used for a variety of conditions in which a person is born with a reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesn't seem to fit the typical definitions of female or male.” Intersex Society of North America, What is Intersex?, http://www.isna.org/faq/what_is_intersex (last visited Jan. 9, 2018).Google Scholar
3 Marjolein van den Brink & Jet Tigchelaar, Gender Identity and Registration of Sex by Public Authorities, 2 Eur. Equality L. Rev. 29 (2015); Marjolein van den Brink, Philipp Reu & Jet Tigchelaar, Out of the Box? Domestic and Private International Law Aspects of Gender Registration: A Comparative Analysis of Germany and the Netherlands, 17(2) Eur. J. of L. Reform 282 (2015).Google Scholar
4 See id.; Zwischengeschlecht.org, STOP Intersex Genital Mutilations in Children's Clinics, stop.genitalmutilation.org/post/Intersex-3rd-gender-in-Germany-Silly-season-fantasies-vs-reality-of-genital-mutilations (last visited Jan. 9, 2018).Google Scholar
5 Nina Dethloff & Susanne Gössl, Country Report for Germany, in M/V en Verder; Sekseregistratie door de Overheid en de Juridische Positie van Transgenders 137, 139 (Marjolein van den Brink & Jet Tigchelaar ed., 2014).Google Scholar
6 Nov. 1 2013, No. 21.4.3 Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Personenstandsgesetz [General Administrative Regulation on the Personal Status Law].Google Scholar
7 Personenstandsgesetz [PStG] [Law on Civil Status], Feb. 19, 2007, BGBl I at § 22 para. 3 (Ger.).Google Scholar
8 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 1 BvR 2019/16 (Oct. 10, 2017), https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html.Google Scholar
9 Transgender or trans is an umbrella terms which refers to person who do not self-identify with the legal sex that was assigned to them at birth.Google Scholar
10 The complainant prefers gender neutral “They/Them” pronouns, which the authors respect in this article.Google Scholar
11 Grundgesetz [GG] [Basic Law], arts. 1(1), 2(1), translation at https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf.Google Scholar
12 Id. at art. 3(3).Google Scholar
13 Judgment of Oct. 10, 2017 at paras. 38–40.Google Scholar
14 See judgment of Oct. 10, 2017 at para. 42.Google Scholar
15 See judgment of Oct. 10, 2017 at paras. 45–54.Google Scholar
16 See judgment of Oct. 10, 2017 at paras. 56–60.Google Scholar
17 See judgment of Oct. 10, 2017 at para. 65.Google Scholar
18 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 16/72, BVerfGE 49, 286 (Oct. 11, 1978).Google Scholar
19 Transsexuellengesetz [TSG] [Transsexuality Act], Sept. 10, 1980, BGBl I at 1654, last amended by art. 1 of the Act, July 17, 2009, BGBl I at 1978 (Ger.).Google Scholar
20 See, e.g., Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvL 1/04, BVerfGE 116, 243 (July 18, 2006) (detailing the nationality requirement); Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 938/81, BVerfGE 60, 123 (Mar. 16, 1982) (describing the minimum age requirement of 25-year-old); Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvL 3/03, BVerfGE 115, 1 (Dec. 6, 2005) (discussing the loss of the changed name after marriage).Google Scholar
21 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvL 10/05, BVerfGE 121, 175 (May 27, 2008).Google Scholar
22 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 3295/07, BVerfGE 128, 109 (Jan. 11, 2011).Google Scholar
23 Chris Ambrosi, Die Dritte Option: Für wen?, VerfBlog (Nov. 29, 2017), https://verfassungsblog.de/die-dritte-option-fuer-wen; Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvL 10/05, BVerfGE 121, 175 (May 27, 2008).Google Scholar
24 See judgment of May 27, 2008 at para. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Berit Völzmann, Gleiche Freiheit für alle!, VerfBlog (Nov. 17, 2017), http://verfassungsblog.de/gleiche-freiheit-fuer-alle-zur-freiheitsrechtlichen-begruendung-des-bverfg-in-der-entscheidung-zur-dritten-option; Sarah Elsuni, “Harter oder weicher Sexit”?, VerfBlog (Nov. 17, 2017), http://verfassungsblog.de/harter-oder-weicher-sexit/.Google Scholar
26 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvF 1/01, BVerfGE 205, 313 (July 17, 2002).Google Scholar
27 Anne E.H. Sanders, When, if not Now? An Update on Civil Partnership in Germany, 17 German L.J. 487 (2016); Nora Markard, Dropping the Other Shoe: Obergefell and the Inevitability of the Constitutional Right to Equal Marriage, 17 German L.J. 509 (2016).Google Scholar
28 Jule Mulder, EU Non-Discrimination law in the Courts: Approaches to Sex and Sexuality Discrimination in EU law 120–39 (2017).Google Scholar
29 See generally Adamietz, Laura, Geschlecht als Erwartung (2011).Google Scholar
30 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], Case No. 1 BvR 2019/16, paras. 50, 58 (Oct. 10, 2017), https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/2017/10/rs20171010_1bvr201916.html.Google Scholar
31 Ambrosi, supra note 23.Google Scholar
32 Nora Markard, Struktur und Teilhabe: zur gleichheitsdogmatischen Bedeutung der “dritten Option”, VerfBlog (Nov. 14, 2017), https://verfassungsblog.de/struktur-und-teilhabe-zur-gleichheitsdogmatischen-bedeutung-der-dritten-option/. For the English translation, see Markard, Nora, Symposium on the ‘Third Option’, ‘Not Man, Not Woman, Not Nothing’: Structure and Participation: On the Significance of the ‘Third Option’ for the Equality Guarantee, Blog of the IACL, AIDC (Feb. 3, 2018), https://iacl-aidc-blog.org/2018/02/03/symposium-on-the-third-option-not-man-not-woman-not-nothing-structure-and-participation-on-the-significance-of-the-third-option-for-the-equality-guarantee/.Google Scholar
33 Case C-13/94 P v. S & Cornwall Cty. Council, 1996 E.C.R. I-2143 paras. 17–21.Google Scholar
34 Case C-117/01 K.B. v. Nat'l Health Serv. Pensions Agency, 2004 E.C.R I-541.Google Scholar
35 Alex Harris, Non-binary Gender Concepts and the Evolving Legal Treatment of UK Transsexed Individuals, 13(6) J. Int'l. Women's Stud. 57 (2012).Google Scholar
36 See Case C-423/04 Richards v. Sec'y of State for Work and Pensions, 2006 E.C.R. I-3585; see also Opinion of Advocate General Bobek, Case C-451/16 M.B. v. Sec'y of State for Work and Pensions (Dec. 5, 2017).Google Scholar
37 Mulder, supra note 28, at 47–54.Google Scholar
38 For an overview, see Mulder, supra note 28, at 122–23.Google Scholar
39 Dorian Needham, A Categorical Imperative? Questioning the Need for Sexual Classification in Québec, 52(1) Les Cahiers de droit 71, 73 (2011); Sonia Katyal, The Numerous Clausus of Sex, 84 U. Chi. L. Rev. 389, 405 (2017). See generally Valentine, Vic, Non-Binary People's Experiences in the UK (2016), https://www.scottishtrans.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Report-final.pdf.Google Scholar
40 Jack Monroe, I'm a Little Bit Female and a Little Bit Male. Finally, I Fit in my Skin, The Guardian (May 19, 2016), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/19/jack-monroe-little-bit-male-little-bit-female; Siobhan Fenton, “A Hole in Your Chest Where Gender Used to Be”: Being Non-binary in the UK, The Independent (Sept. 21, 2016), http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/what-does-non-binary-mean-what-its-like-to-not-have-a-male-female-gender-a7317086.html.Google Scholar
41 James, Sandy E. et al., The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey 44 (2016).Google Scholar
42 Terry S Kogan, Transsexuals and Critical Gender Theory: The Possibility of a Restroom Labelled “Other”, 48 Hastings L.J. 1223, 1224 (1996); Murray Couch et al., Tranznation: A Report on the Health and Wellbeing of Trans People in Australia and New Zealand 69 (2007).Google Scholar
43 Genny Beemyn & Susan Rankin, The Lives of Transgender People 152 (2011).Google Scholar
44 Megan Davidson, Seeking Refuge under the Umbrella: Inclusion, Exclusion, and Organising within the Category Transgender 4(4) Sexuality Res. and Soc. Pol'y 60, 66 (2007); Amy McCrea, Under the Transgender Umbrella: Improving ENDA's Protections 15 Geo. J. Gender and L. 543, 556 (2014).Google Scholar
45 Patricia Gagne, Richard Tewksbury & Deanna McGaughey, Coming Out and Crossing Over: Identity Formation and Proclamation in a Transgender Community 11 Gender and Soc. 478, 501 (1997).Google Scholar
46 Cisgender—derived from the Latin word, “cis”, meaning “on this side of”—refers to persons who self-identify with the legal sex that is assigned to them at birth.Google Scholar
47 Case C-13/94 P v. S & Cornwall Cty. Council, 1996 E.C.R. I-2143 para. 20.Google Scholar
48 Identoba & Others v. Geor., 39 Eur. Ct. H.R. 510 (2015).Google Scholar
49 U.N. Human Rights Comm., G v. Austral., no. 2172/2012.Google Scholar
50 See generally European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, The Fundamental Rights Situation of Intersex People (2015), http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2015-focus-04-intersex.pdf.Google Scholar
51 Identoba 39 Eur. Ct. H.R. at para. 96.Google Scholar
52 Goodwin v. U.K, 35 Eur. H.R. Rep. 18 (2002); L v. Lith., 46 Eur. H.R. Rep. 22 (2008).Google Scholar
53 A.P., Garcon & Nicot v. Fr., App. Nos. 79885/12, 52471/13 & 52596/13 (April 6, 2017), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913.Google Scholar
54 See, e.g., Hamalainen v. Fin., 1 FCR 379 (2015) (Sajo, J., Keller, J. & Lemmens, J. dissenting).Google Scholar
55 U.N. Human Rights Comm., G v. Austral., no. 2172/2012 at paras. 7.11–15.Google Scholar
56 See id. at para 7.2; Goodwin, supra note 52, at para. 90.Google Scholar
57 U.N. Human Rights Comm., G v. Austral., no. 2172/2012 at para. 7.2; Goodwin, supra note 52, at para. 90.Google Scholar
58 See U.N. Human Rights Comm., G v. Austral., no. 2172/2012 at para. 7.2; Goodwin, supra note 52, at para. 90; see also Schlumpf v. Switz., App. No. 29002/06 (Jan. 8, 2009); L, supra note 52; AP, Garcon & Nicot, supra note 53.Google Scholar
59 See, e.g., Intersex Society of North America, Does ISNA Think Children With Intersex Should Be Raised Without a Gender, or in a Third Gender?, http://www.isna.org/faq/third-gender (last visited Dec. 30, 2017); Grietje Baars, The Politics of Recognition and the Limits of Emancipation Through Law, VerfBlog (Nov. 29, 2017), http://verfassungsblog.de/the-politics-of-recognition-and-the-limits-of-emancipation-through-law/.Google Scholar
60 Ghattas, Dan C., Human Rights Between the Sexes: A Preliminary Study on the Life Situations of Inter individuals 47 (2013).Google Scholar
61 4th International Intersex Forum – Media Statement, OII Eur. (Apr. 26, 2017), https://oiieurope.org/4th-international-intersex-forum-media-statement/.Google Scholar
62 3rd International Intersex Forum, ILGA Eur. (Dec. 1, 2013), https://www.ilga-europe.org/what-we-do/our-advocacy-work/trans-and-intersex/intersex/events/3rd-international-intersex-forum.Google Scholar
63 Anne Tamar-Mattis, Exceptions to the Rule: Curing the Law's Failure to Protect Intersex Infants, 21 Gender, Berkeley J., L. & Justice 59 (2006); Elisabeth McDonald, Intersex People in Aotearoa New Zealand: The Challenges for Law and Social Policy: Part I: Critiquing Gender Normalising Surgery, 46 Wellington, Victoria U. L. Rev. 705 (2015); Aileen Kennedy, Fixed at Birth: Medical and Legal Erasures of Intersex Variations, 39 U. New South Wales L.J 813 (2016); Jo Bird, When Sex Means Condition or Impairment: Evaluating the Human Rights of Transgender and Intersex Peoples, 5 Southern Cross U. L. Rev. 1 (2001).Google Scholar
64 German Institute for Human Rights, Gender Diversity in Law: The Status Quo and the Development of Regulatory Models for Recognizing and Protecting Gender Diversity 15 (2017), http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CAT/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CAT_NGO_DEU_47_8558_E.pdf.Google Scholar
65 See, e.g., Association of Intersexual People / XY Women, Parallel Report to the 5th Periodic Report of the Federal Republic of Germany on the Convention against Torture, and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CAT/Shared%20Documents/DEU/INT_CAT_NGO_DEU_47_8558_E.pdf (last visited May 8, 2018); Amnesty International, First, Do No Harm: Ensuring the Rights of Children Born Intersex, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2017/05/intersex-rights/ (last visited May 8, 2018).Google Scholar
66 Corte Constitucional [C.C.] [Constitutional Court], SU-337/99 (May 12, 1999) (Colom Corte Constitucional [C.C.] [Constitutional Court], T-551/99 (Aug. 2, 1999) (Colom.); see also Hupf, Robert, Allyship to the Intersex Community on Cosmetic, Non-Consensual Genital “Normalising Surgery”, 22 Wm. & Women, Mary J. and L. 73, 98–100 (2015); Julie A Greenberg & Cheryl Chase, Background of Colombia Decisions, Intersex Society of North America (1999), http://www.isna.org/node/21.Google Scholar
67 Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics Act, s. 14 (2015) (Malta).Google Scholar
68 German Institute for Human Rights, supra note 64, at 5.Google Scholar
69 Studies from around Europe and the United States have—in the past decade—consistently shown that the number of individuals—either trans or otherwise—who identify as non-binary are consistently growing. See, e.g., Valentine, Vic, Non-Binary People's Experiences in the U.K. (2016); Christina Richards et al., Non-binary or Genderqueer Genders, 28 Int'l Rev. of Psychiatry 95 (2016).Google Scholar
70 See S.B. 179, 2017 Leg. (Cal. 2017), https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB179.Google Scholar
71 Information about Changing Sex/Gender Identity, Identity and Passports (Sept. 29, 2016) https://www.passports.govt.nz/what-you-need-to-renew-or-apply-for-a-passport/information/.Google Scholar
72 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 3295/07, BVerfGE 128, 109 (Jan. 11, 2011); see also Dutta, Anatol, The Legal Status of Transgender and Transsexual Persons in Germany, in The Legal Status OF Transgender and Transsexual Persons 207–21 (Jens M Scherpe ed., 2015).Google Scholar
73 See Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfGE] [Federal Constitutional Court], 1 BvR 3295/07, BVerfGE 128, 109 (Jan. 11, 2011).Google Scholar
74 Alice Newlin, Should a Trip from Illinois to Tennessee Change a Woman into a Man? Proposal for a Uniform Interstate Sex Reassignment Recognition Act, 17 Colum. J. Gender & L. 461, 465 (2008); Olga Tomchin, Bodies and Bureaucracy: Legal Sex Classification and Marriage-Based Immigration for Trans* People, 101 Calif. L. Rev. 813, 843 (2013); Stephanie Markowitz, Change of Sex Designation on Transsexuals' Birth Certificates: Public Policy and Equal Protection, 14 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 705, 707, 710 (2008); Harper Jean Tobin, Against the Surgical Requirement for Change of Legal Sex, 38 Case Western Res. J. Int'l L. 393, 401 (2006); Robyn Brammer & Ginicola, Misty M., Counselling Transgender Clients, in Affirmative Counselling with LGBTQI+ People 186 (Ginicola, Misty M., Cheri Smith, Filmore, Joel M. eds., 2017).Google Scholar
75 AP, Garcon & Nicot, supra note 53.Google Scholar
76 Supreme Court of Nepal, Writ No. 917, 2064 BS (2007 AD) (Dec. 21, 2007).Google Scholar
77 National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v Union of India et al., (2014) Supreme Court of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 400 of 2012 (Apr. 15, 2014).Google Scholar
78 Supreme Court of Pakistan, Constitution Petition No. 43 of 2009 (Mar. 22, 2011).Google Scholar
79 Surya Monro, Beyond Male and Female: Poststructuralism and the Spectrum of Gender, 8 Int'l J. Transgenderism 3, 18 (2005); Theodore Bennett, “No Man's Land”: Non-Binary Sex Identification in Australian Law and Policy, 37 U. New South Wales L.J. 847, 858 (2014).Google Scholar
80 Maria Pahl, Immutability of Identity, Title VII, and the ADA Amendment Act: How Being “Regarded As” Transgender Could Affect Employment Discrimination, 3 De Women, Paul J., Gender & L. 63, 68 (2014); Sarah Marsh, The Gender-fluid Generation: Young People on Being Male, Female or Non-binary, The Guardian (Mar. 23, 2016), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/23/gender-fluid-generation-youngpeople-male-female-trans. Chau and Herring write that where current gender standards “unreasonably restric[t] people's identity into one of two sexes, it becomes hard to deny that restricting people to three identities is open to identical objections.” See P-L Chau & Jonathan Herring, Defining, Assigning and Designing Sex, 16 Int'l J.L., Pol'y & Fam. 327, 356 (2002).Google Scholar
81 Scottish Government, Review of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 – A Consultation, 7.23–.29 (2017) https://consult.gov.scot/family-law/review-of-the-gender-recognition-act-2004/user_uploads/sct1017251758-1_gender_p4–3-.pdf (last visited May 8, 2018).Google Scholar
82 Riki Anne Wilchins, Read My Lips: Sexual Subversion and the end of Gender 16 (1997); Martine Rothblatt, The Apartheid of Sex: Manifesto on the Freedom of Gender 103 (1996).Google Scholar
82 Elizabeth Reilly, Radical Tweak – Relocating the Power to Assign Sex – From Enforcer of Differentiation to Facilitator of Inclusiveness: Revising the Response to Intersexuality, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 297, 332 (2005); Susan Stryker, Undoing Sex Classification can Provide Justice, N.Y. Times (Oct. 19, 2014), http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/19/is-checking-the-sex-box-necessary/undoing-sex-classification-can-provide-justice;_Miqqi Alicia Gilbert, Defeating Bigenderism: Changing Gender Assumptions in the Twenty-first Century, 24 Hypatia 93, 103 (2009).Google Scholar
83 Government of Australia, Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender 8 (2015) https://www.ag.gov.au/Publications/Documents/AustralianGovernmentGuidelinesontheRecognitionofSexandGender/AustralianGovernmentGuidelinesontheRecognitionofSexandGender.PDF; Anna James Neuman Wipfler, Identity Crisis: The Limitations of Expanding Government Recognition of Gender Identity and the Possibility of Genderless Identity Documents, 39 Harv. J.L. & Gender 491, 539 (2016); Linda C McClain, Categorizing by Sex is a Remedy for Discrimination, N.Y. Times (Oct. 20, 2014), http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/10/19/is-checking-the-sex-box-necessary/categorizing-by-sex-is-a-remedy-for-discrimination; Judith Lorber, Using gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement, 1 Feminist Theory 79, 90 (2000).Google Scholar
84 Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Emma Aurora Bäck & Anna Lindqvist, Introducing a Gender-neutral Pronoun in a Natural Gender Language: The Influence of Time on Attitudes and Behavior, 6 Frontiers in Psychol. (2015), http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00893/full. According to Vade, “[i]f we act as if gender does not exist, then we act as if sexism and transphobia do not exist and so reinforce the privilege of … in particular, male genders.” Dylan Vade, Expanding Gender and Expanding the Law: Toward a Social and Legal Conceptualization of Gender that is more Inclusive of Transgender People, 11 Mich. J. Gender & L. 253, 277–78 (2005).Google Scholar
85 Government of Australia, supra note 83, at 5.Google Scholar
86 House of Commons Select Committee on Women and Equalities, Transgender Equality (2016).Google Scholar
87 Verfassungsgerichtshof [VfGH] [Austrian Constitutional Court] Mar. 14, 2018, E 2918/2016-29, https://www.vfgh.gv.at/downloads/VfGH_Pruefungsbeschluss_E_2918-2016_unbest_Geschlecht_ano.pdf.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by