Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:21:40.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wackerfield Dyke, County Durham

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Arthur Holmes  and
Stanley Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The dyke to be described in this paper has not hitherto been noticed in petrological literature, although the western part has been recorded on the map of the area by the Geological Survey. It exhibits, nevertheless, some interesting features and adds data to our knowledge of the minor intrusions of north-east England.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 58 , Issue 10 , October 1921 , pp. 440 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 447 note 1 Heslop, M. K. & Smythe, J. A., Q.J.G.S., vol. lxvi, 1910, p. 7.Google Scholar

page 447 note 2 Ibid., p. 17.

page 449 note 1 Lunedale, Yorkshire.

page 449 note 2 Kirkwhelpington, Northumberland.

page 449 note 3 Greenhead, Northumberland.

page 450 note 1 Min. Mag., vol. xviii, 1918, p. 216.Google Scholar

page 453 note 1 Tyrrell, G. W., Geol. Mag., 1917, pp. 305 and 350. See also S. Tsuboi, Journ. Geol. Soc. Tokyo, xxv, 1918, p. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar