Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
As this subject has been a matter for considerable debate during the past few years, and the British Committee of the International Geological Congress have had the matter under their consideration, it may be useful if I attempt to place before the readers of the Geological Magazine the results of the investigations of our sub-committee. As is well known, the term “Poikilitic” has been proposed in some quarters as a comprehensive name for both series, some writers advocating the view that they ought to be regarded as one “system,” as indeed they were of old under the name “New Red Sandstone.”
page 158 Note 1 It must be understood that the sub-committee is in no way collectively responsible for any of the statements made in this paper.
page 159 Note 1 Vide Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxx.Google Scholar
page 160 Note 1 Vide Nature, Nos. 630, 631.Google Scholar a lecture by Prof. Ball, Robert S., LL.D., F.R.S.Google Scholar
page 160 Note 2 Elemente der Geologie, Leipzig, 1876 (p. 352).Google Scholar
page 160 Note 3 Vide Siluria, also a paper by Murehison, and Morris, , Q. J. G. S., vol. xi.Google Scholar
page 161 Note 1 Vide Lettres sur les Roches du Jura, par Jules Marcou, Paris, 1860.Google Scholar
page 162 Note 1 Vide Q. J. G. S. vol. xiv.Google Scholar
page 162 Note 2 Vide Q.J.G.S. vol. xx.Google Scholar
page 162 Note 3 Ibid., vol. xviii.
page 163 Note 1 Vide Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxii.; also Mr. Wilson's paper in the Midland Naturalist, and letters to the Editor of the GEOL. MAG.Google Scholar
page 164 Note 1 Vide Reports of Section C. of the British Association for 1881.Google Scholar