Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:06:13.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

VI.—Notes on Russian Geology1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. F. Hume
W. F. Hume
Affiliation:
DemonstratorinGeology, Royal College of Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous paper on the Loess of S. Kussia, I endeavoured to discuss its character and origin, and to compare the facts observed with the results obtained by many students of the latest phases of our earth's history.inso doing I overlooked two articles on this subject, which appeared in the GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE for 1882, and embodied the views held by Baron von Eichthofen and Sir H. Howorth respectively.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 7 , July 1894 , pp. 303 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1894

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

For No. I. Cretaceous, see GEOL. MAG. September, 1892; No. II. the Loess, see GEOL. MAG. December, 1892.

References

1 For No. I. Cretaceous, see GEOL. MAG. September, 1892; No. II. the Loess, see GEOL. MAG. December, 1892.