No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The damage done to the land at the north end of Southwold by the “moderate gale” of May, 1895, has been described by Mr. J. Spiller. One result of this damage was the opening up of an interesting geological section along the base of the low cliffs, a short account of which I brought before the last meeting of the British Association at Ipswich.
page 354 note 1 Geol. Mag., Jan. 1896, p. 23Google Scholar. See also Howorth, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. li, p. 496.Google Scholar
page 356 note 1 It is interesting to learn that Mr. J. H. Blake observed beds that might belong to the Rootlet Bed (Forest Bed series) at Easton Bavent.—Whitaker, “Geol.Southwold,” p. 70.Google Scholar
page 356 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xlv, p. 504.Google Scholar
page 356 note 3 See Whitaker, , “Geol. Southwold,” p. 62.Google Scholar
page 357 note 1 “Geology of Holderness,” p. 74.Google Scholar
page 357 note 2 Some masses of modern beach-shingle, plastered against the fresh-water bed, have also been cemented into an iron pan.
page 357 note 3 “Geology of Southwold,” 1887, pp. 61, 81, etc.Google Scholar
page 357 note 4 Reid, , “Pliocene Deposits of Britain,” 1890, pp. 101, 201, etc.Google Scholar; Howorth, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. li, p. 498.Google Scholar