No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
This remarkable siderolite was found in Bohemia, at a spot not very far distant from the Saxon frontier or indeed from Rittersgrün, in Saxony, where a mass closely resembling it was almost contemporaneously found. So far back as 1751 at Steinbach, a village about midway between Breitenbach and Rittersgrün, a meteorite in all respects similar was discovered; the three masses are so similar to one another and so dissimilar to any others preserved in collections that there can be little doubt that they belong to the same fall. In 1825 Stromeyer examined a siderolite in which he found 61·8 per cent, of silica; this also appears to have been a member of this shower of meteorites, believed by Breithaupt to have been the “Eisenregen” which occurred at Whitsuntide, 1164, in Saxony, when a mass of iron fell near the town of Meissen.
page 548 note 1 Story-Maskelyne, N.. Proc. Royal Soc. 1869, xix. 266.—Google Scholarvon Lang, V.. Sitzber. Ak. Wiss. Wien, 1869, lix. 848.Google ScholarPogg. Ann. cxxxix. 315.Google Scholar—Story-Maskelyne, N.. Phil. Trans. 1871, clxi. 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar—vom Rath, G.. Zeit. Deut. Geol. Gesell. Berlin, 1873, xxv. 106.Google ScholarPogg. Ann. Erganz.-Bd. vi. 337.Google ScholarJahrb. Mineralogie, 1874, i. 79.Google Scholar
page 549 note 1 About the time that von Lang published these results vom Rath measured some crystals of terrestrial bronzite, found in a sanidine bomb from the Laachersee, and arrived at results which accord very exactly with those of von Lang. (Pogg. Ann., cxxxviii. 529.)
page 549 note 2 Eammelsberg, C.. Pogg. Ann., cxl. 311.Google Scholar Rammelsberg draws attention to the remarkable accordance between the angles of bronzite and olivine, which would explain the fact of G. Rose having regarded the silicate in the siderolites of Rittersgrün and Steinbach as olivine. (See note to page 313.)
page 550 note 1 Asman is the Sanscrit term, corresponding to the Greek ⋯κμων, for the thunderoolt of Indra.
page 551 note 1 Partsch, P.. Die Meteoriten im k. k. Hof-Mineralien-Kabinette zu Wien. 1843. Page 96.Google Scholar
page 552 note 1 Haushofer, K.. Jour. Prakt. Chem., 1869, cvii. 330.Google Scholar—Berthelot, M.. Ann. chim. et phys. 1873, xxx. 419.Google Scholar
page 552 note 2 von Haidinger, W.. Sitzber. Ak. Wiss. Wien, 1861, xliii. 583; xliv. 378 and 465; and 1862, xlv. 63.Google Scholar
page 553 note 1 Berthelot, M.. Ann. de Chim. et de Physique, xix. 405.Google Scholar
page 553 note 2 Wöhler and Cloez have found that certain of the carbonaceous meteorites contain compounds of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, resembling the last residues of organic substances of terrestrial origin. By applying his method of hydrogenation to the carbonaceous matter of the Orgueil meteorite, he succeeded in forming a notable quantity of a hydrocarbon of the series (C2n H2n + 2) comparable with the oils of petroleum. This new analogy between the carbonaceous matter of meteorites and substances of organic origin occurring in the crust of our planet is of great interest. (Compt. rend., lxvii. 849.Google Scholar)
page 553 note 3 Troilite in large nodules is abundantly present in this meteoric iron.
page 554 note 1 Tschermak, G.. Mineralogische Mittheilungen, 1871, 109.Google Scholar—Smith, J. L.. Amer. Jour. Sc., 1873, v. 107, and 1874, vii. 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar— See also Gregory, G. R.. Geol. Mag. 1868, v. 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 554 note 2 Smith, J. L.. Amer. Jour. Sc., 1874, vii. 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 555 note 1 Tschermak, G.. Mineralogische Mittheilungen, 1872, 165.Google Scholar
page 556 note 1 Shepard, C. U.. Amer. Jour. Sc., 1869, xlvii. 233.Google Scholar In the catalogue of the Vienna Collection this iron bears the date 1864.
page 557 note 1 Tschermak, G.. Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 1872, lxv. 135.Google ScholarMineralogische Mittheilungen, 1872, 95.Google Scholar—Exner, A.Mineralogische Mittheilungen, 1872, 41.Google Scholar
page 557 note 2 Proc. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, 1865, 94.Google Scholar
page 558 note 1 Lumpe, E.. Mineralogische Mittheilungen, 1871, 55.Google Scholar—Tschermak, G., Minerals ogische Mittheilungen, 1871, 56; and 1872, 87Google Scholar; Sitsber. Ak. Wiss. Wien, 1872, lxv. 122Google Scholar; Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, 1872, 733.Google Scholar—See also F. Crook. On the Chemical; Constitution of the Ensishcim, Mauerkirchen, Sherghotty, and Muddoor Stones, Inaug-Dissert.) 1868. Gottingen: E. A. Huth.
page 560 note 1 Smith, J. L.Amer. Jour. Sc., 1870, xlix. 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar