Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T09:08:51.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Views on Spore Nomenclature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Robert Potonié
Robert Potonié
Affiliation:
Amt für Bodenforschung, Krefeld, West Germany.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spore nomenclature and palaeobotanical nomenclature follow exactly the same rules. In both there are difficulties which must be understood historically.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 95 , Issue 6 , December 1958 , pp. 491 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, H. N., 1955. Index of Generic Names of fossil plants. U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull., 1013, 1–262.Google Scholar
Balme, B. E., and Hennelly, J. P. H., 1956. Monolete, monocolpate and alete Sporomorphs from Australian Permian sediments. Austral. J. Bot., 4, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdtman, G., 1947. Suggestions for the classification of fossil and recent pollen grains and spores. Svensk Bot. Tidskr., 41, 1, 104–114.Google Scholar
Faegri, K., 1956. Recent trends in Palynology. Bot. Review, 22, 639–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guennel, G. K., 1956. Systematic methods for Paleozoic plant microfossils. Micropaleontology, 2, 393–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammen, Th. van der, 1956. A palynological Systematic Nomenclature. Bol. Geol, Bogotá, 4, 63–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutzsch, W., 1954. Bemerkungen zur Benennung und Klassifikation fossiler (inbes. Tertiärer) Pollen und Sporen. Geologie, 3, 258–311.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, J. (ed.), 1956. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Regnum Vegetabile, 8, Utrecht.Google Scholar
Pant, D. B., 1954. Suggestions for the classification and nomenclature of fossil spores and pollen grains. The Bot. Rev., India, 20, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potonié, H., 1909. Vorschläge zur Regelung der paläobotanischen Nomenklatur. Jahrb. Kgl. Preuss. Geol. L.A., 30, 533–7.Google Scholar
Potonié, R., 1934. Zur Microbotanik des eocänen Humodils des Geiseltals. Arb. Inst. Paläobot. Petrogr. Brennst., Preuss. Geol. L.–A., Berlin, 4, 25–125.Google Scholar
Potonié, R. 1956 a. Die Behandlung der Sporae dispersae und der fossilen Pflanzen überhaupt nach den Internationalen Code der botanischen Nomenklatur. Pal. Z. 30, 69–87.Google Scholar
Potonié, R. 1956 b. Stratigraphische Inkongruität der Organe des Pflanzenkörpers. Pal. Z.,30, 88–94.Google Scholar
Potonié, R. 1956 c. 1958. Synopsis der Gattungen der Sporae dispersae I & II. Beih. Geol. Jb., 23, 31.Google Scholar
Rouse, G. E., 1957. The Application of a new nomenclatural approach to Upper Cretaceous plant microfossils from Western Canada. Can. J. Bot., 35, 350–375.Google Scholar
Traverse, A., 1957. The nomenclatural problem of plant microfossil species belonging to extant genera. Micropaleontology, 3, 255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar