Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:19:17.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Testing the analytical performance of handheld XRF using marine sediments of IODP Expedition 355

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2019

A. Hahn Open the ORCID record for A. Hahn [Opens in a new window] ,
M. G. Bowen ,
P. D. Clift Open the ORCID record for P. D. Clift [Opens in a new window] ,
D. K. Kulhanek Open the ORCID record for D. K. Kulhanek [Opens in a new window]  and
M. W. Lyle
A. Hahn*
Affiliation:
MARUM, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. 8, 28359 Bremen, Germany
M. G. Bowen
Affiliation:
International Ocean Discovery Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA
P. D. Clift
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, 3838 W Lakeshore Dr, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
D. K. Kulhanek
Affiliation:
International Ocean Discovery Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA
M. W. Lyle
Affiliation:
College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obtaining geochemical profiles using X-ray fluorescent (XRF) techniques has become a standard procedure in many sediment core studies. The resulting datasets are not only important tools for palaeoclimatic and palaeoceanographic reconstructions, but also for stratigraphic correlation. The International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) has therefore recently introduced shipboard application of a handheld XRF device, making geochemical data directly available to the science party. In all XRF scanning techniques, the physical properties of wet core halves cause substantial analytical deviations. In order to obtain estimates of element concentrations (e.g. for quantitative analyses of fluxes or mass-balance calculations), a calibration of the scanning data is required. We test whether results from the handheld XRF analysis on discrete samples are suitable for calibrating scanning data. Log-ratios with Ca as a common denominator were calculated. The comparison between the handheld device and conventional measurements show that the latter provide high-quality data describing Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, Mn, Fe, Zn, Rb and Sr content (R2 compared with conventional measurements: ln(Al/Ca) = 0.99, ln(Si/Ca) = 0.98, ln(K/Ca) = 0.99, ln(Ti/Ca) = 0.99, ln(Mn/Ca) = 0.99, ln(Fe/Ca) = 0.99, ln(Zn/Ca) = 0.99 and ln(Sr/Ca) = 0.99). Our results imply that discrete measurements using the shipboard handheld analyser are suitable for the calibration of XRF scanning data. Our test was performed on downcore sediments from IODP Expedition 355 that display a wide variety of lithologies of both terrestrial and marine origin. The implication is that our findings are valid on a general scale and that shipboard handheld XRF analysis on discrete samples should be used for calibrating XRF scanning data.

Keywords

X-ray fluorescentIODP expedition 355 “Arabian Sea Monsoon”handheld XRF spectrometerXRF scanning
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 157 , Special Issue 6: Climate-tectonic interactions in the eastern Arabian Sea , June 2020 , pp. 956 - 960
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Geological Magazine special issue “Climate-Tectonic Interactions in the Eastern Arabian Sea” on ScholarOne

References

Croudace, IW and Rothwell, RG (eds) (2015) Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores: Applications of a Non-Destructive Tool for the Environmental Sciences, Volume 17, Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govin, A, Holzwarth, U, Heslop, D, Ford Keeling, L, Zabel, M, Mulitza, S and Chiessi, CM (2012) Distribution of major elements in Atlantic surface sediments (36°N–49°S): imprint of terrigenous input and continental weathering. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 13, Q01013, doi: 10.1029/2011gc003785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindaraju, K (1994) 1994 compilation of working values and sample description for 383 geostandards. Geostandards Newsletter 18, 1–158, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.53202081.x-i1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, KM, Rohling, EJ, Westerhold, T, Zabel, M, Heslop, D, Konijnendijk, T and Lourens, L (2017) A 3 million year index for North African humidity/aridity and the implication of potential pan-African Humid periods. Quaternary Science Reviews 171, 100–18, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häggi, C, Sawakuchi, AO, Chiessi, CM, Mulitza, S, Mollenhauer, G, Sawakuchi, HO and Schefuß, E (2016) Origin, transport and deposition of leaf-wax biomarkers in the Amazon Basin and the adjacent Atlantic. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 192, 149–65, doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2016.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, A, Compton, JS, Meyer-Jacob, C, Kirsten, KL, Lucasssen, F, Pérez Mayo, M and Zabel, M (2016) Holocene paleo-climatic record from the South African Namaqualand mudbelt: a source to sink approach. Quaternary International 404, 121–35, doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.10.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennekam, R and De Lange, G (2012) X‐ray fluorescence core scanning of wet marine sediments: methods to improve quality and reproducibility of high‐resolution paleoenvironmental records. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 10, 991–1003.Google Scholar
Kolla, V and Coumes, K (1987) Morphology, internal structure, seismic stratigraphy, and sedimentation of Indus Fan. AAPG Bulletin 71, 650–77.Google Scholar
Kulhanek, DK, Lyle, M and Bowen, MG (2018) Data Report: X-ray fluorescence scanning of Exp 355 Site U1456 sediments, Laxmi Basin, Arabian Sea. In Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program (eds Pandey, DK, Clift, PD, Kulhanek, DK and the Expedition 355 Scientists). College Station, Texas, vol. 355.Google Scholar
Lyle, M, Kulhanek, DK, Bowen, MG and Hahn, A (2018) Data Report: X-ray fluorescence scanning of Exp 355 Site U1457 sediments, Laxmi Basin, Arabian Sea. In Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program (eds Pandey, DK, Clift, PD, Kulhanek, DK and the Expedition 355 Scientists). College Station, Texas, vol. 355.Google Scholar
Pandey, DK, Clift, PD, Kulhanek, DK, Andò, S, Bendle, JAP, Bratenkov, S, Griffith, EM, Gurumurthy, GP, Hahn, A, Iwai, M, Khim, B-K, Kumar, A, Kumar, AG, Liddy, HM, Lu, H, Lyle, MW, Mishra, R, Radhakrishna, T, Routledge, CM, Saraswat, R, Saxena, R, Scardia, G, Sharma, GK, Singh, AD, Steinke, S, Suzuki, K, Tauxe, L, Tiwari, M, Xu, Z and Yu, Z (2016) Expedition 355 summary. In Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program: Arabian Sea Monsoon (eds Pandey, DK, Clift, PD, Kulhanek, DK and the Expedition 355 Scientists). International Ocean Discovery Program, College Station, TX, vol. 355, doi: 10.14379/iodp.proc.355.101.2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, WBF, Carbotte, SM, Coplan, JO, Hara, SO, Melkonian, A, Arko, R, Weissel, RA, Ferrini, V, Goodwillie, A, Nitsche, F, Bonczkowski, J and Zemsky, R (2009) Global multi-resolution topography synthesis. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, R (2012) X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis: Practical and Easy. Fluxana, Bedburg-Hau.Google Scholar
Tjallingii, R, Röhl, U, Kölling, M and Bickert, T (2007) Influence of the water content on X‐ray fluorescence core‐scanning measurements in soft marine sediments. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 8, doi: 10.1029/2006GC001393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, I, Cruz, APS, Mulitza, S, Chiessi, CM, Mackensen, A, Lippold, J, Tisserand, AA (2017) Variability in mid‐depth ventilation of the western Atlantic Ocean during the last deglaciation. Paleoceanography 32, 948–65, doi: 10.1002/2017PA003095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltje, GJ, Bloemsma, MR, Tjallingii, R, Heslop, D, Röhl, U and Croudace, IW (2015) Prediction of geochemical composition from XRF core scanner data: a new multivariate approach including automatic selection of calibration samples and quantification of uncertainties. In Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores (eds Croudace, IW and Rothwell, RG), pp. 507–34. Springer, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weltje, GJ and Tjallingii, R (2008) Calibration of XRF core scanners for quantitative geochemical logging of sediment cores: theory and application. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 274, 423–38, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelms-Dick, D, Westerhold, T, Rohl, U, Wilhelms, F, Vogt, C, Hanebuth, TJJ and Kasten, S (2012) A comparison of mm scale resolution techniques for element analysis in sediment cores. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 27, 1574–84, doi: 10.1039/C2JA30148B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Chiessi, CM, Mulitza, S, Sawakuchi, AO, Häggi, C, Zabel, M and Wefer, G (2017) Different precipitation patterns across tropical South America during Heinrich and Dansgaard-Oeschger stadials. Quaternary Science Reviews 177, 1–9, doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.10.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hahn et al. supplementary material

Hahn et al. supplementary material 1

Download Hahn et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.7 MB