Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:08:11.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supposed Commensalism of Carboniferous Spirorbids and certain Non-marine Lamellibranchs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In the course of examination of the non-marine lamellibranchs from British Carboniferous rocks I have for several years noted all instances of the attachment of the tubes of Spirorbis. The observations which have been made confirm the conclusions of Pruvost (1919, p. 32; 1930, p. 257) that Spirorbis in the Coal Measures is frequently found attached to plants, occasionally to marine shells, and more commonly to non-marine lamellibranchs. Of the latter, Naiadites and Anthraconauta show the greatest number of attachments; attachments to Carbonicola are not uncommon, but Spirorbis is rarely, if ever, attached to Anthracomya. Over 80 per cent of the attachments recorded by the writer from the Lower Westphalian relate to Naiadites, practically all the remainder relating to Carbonicola; in many instances, however, there were great numbers of Spirorbis attached to individual specimens of Naiadites whereas the numbers in the case of Carbonicola were generally much smaller. In the Upper Westphalian attachment to Anthraconauta is very common, and the similarity of Anthraconauta and Naiadites in this respect was urged by Pruvost as one evidence of their presumed relationship and as justification for separating Anthraconauta from Anthracomya (1930, p. 223). These conclusions I am able to endorse from these observations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Augener, H., 1926. Uber das Vorkommen von Spirorbis-Röhren an Einsiedler krebsen. Zool. Anzeiger, 68, 202.Google Scholar
Barrois, C., 1904. Sur les Spirorbes du Terrain Houiller de Bruay. Ann. Soc. Géol. du Nord, 33, 50.Google Scholar
Binney, E. W., 1852. On Some Trails and Holes found in rocks of the Carboniferous Strata, with remarks on the Microconchus carbonarius. Mem. Lit. and Phil. Soc. Manchester, 2nd ser., 10, 181.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., 1926. Anthracopupa britannica sp. nov., a land Gastropod from the Red Beds of the Uppermost Coal-Measures of Northern Worcestershire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxii, 401.Google Scholar
Etheridge, R., jun., , 1878. On our Present Knowledge of the Invertebrate Fauna of the Lower Carboniferous or Calciferous Sandstone Series, etc. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xxxiv, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, R., jun., , 1880. A Contribution to the Study of the British Carboniferous Tubicolar Annelida. Geol. Mag., xvii, 109, etc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedotov, D., 1937. The Pelecypoda from the Coal-bearing deposits of the Kuznetsk Basin. Trans. Cent. Geol. Prosp. Instit., Fasc. 97Google Scholar
Firket, A., 1878. Sur quelques fossiles animaux du système houiller du bassin de Liége. Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg., vi, p. xciv.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A., 1901. Fauna der Gaskohle, bd. iv.Google Scholar
Hopkins, W., 1929. The Distribution and Sequence of the Non-marine Lamellibranchs in the Coal-Measures of Northumberland and Durham. Trans. Inst. Min. Eng., lxxviii, 126.Google Scholar
Malaquin, A., 1904. Le Spirorbis pusillus du Terrain Houiller de Bruay. La Formation du tube des Spirorbes et leur adaptation en eau douce, etc. Ann. Soc. Géol. du Nord, 33, 63.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1839. The Silurian System.Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I., 1867. The Silurian System 4th edition.Google Scholar
Okudo, , Shiro, , 1934. On a Tubicolous Polychaete living in Commensal with a Pycnogonid. Annot. Zool. Japan, 14, 437.Google Scholar
Prestwich, J., 1840. Geology of Coalbrookdale. Trans. Geol. Soc., 2nd ser., v, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruvost, P., 1913. Les Niveaux à Lamellibranches d'eau douce dans le terrain houiller du Nord de la France. Ann. Soc. Géol. du Nord, 42, 475.Google Scholar
Pruvost, P., 1919. La Fauna Continentale du terrain houiller du nord de la France. Mèm. Carte Géol. dét. de la France.Google Scholar
Pruvost, P., 1930. La Faune Continentale du Terrain Houiller de la Belgique. Mém. Mus. Roy. d'Hist. Nat. de Beige, 44.Google Scholar
Trueman, A. E., 1933. A Suggested Correlation of the Coal Measures, etc. Proc. S. Wales Inst. Eng., xlix, 63.Google Scholar
Wanner, H. E., 1927. Some Additional Faunal Remains from the Trias of York County, Pennsylvania. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., 78, 21.Google Scholar
Wood, A., 1935. The Origin of the Structure known as Guilielmites. Geol. Mag., lxxii, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakovlev, N. N., 1926. The phenomena of the parasitism, commensalism, and symbiosis in the palaeozoic invertebrata. Ann. Soc. Paléont. Russia, 4, 113.Google Scholar