Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
In 1902 the author proposed a new classification of the genus Lichas, introducing several new subgeneric names. Gürich's valuable paper dealing with the same subject, which was published late in 1901, unfortunately only came into his hands after his article was in the press, so that full justice could not be done to it. Since that time a considerable amount of work has been done on the genus Lichas, but the principles governing the classification put forward in 1902 have not been upset, and no fundamental modifications have been introduced, though many new species have been described and several new subgeneric or generic divisions have been established.
page 454 note 1 Reed, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. lviii, 1902, pp. 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 454 note 2 Gürich, , Neues Jahrb. f. Miner. Geol., Beil. Bd. xiv, 1901, pp. 519–39, t. xviii, figs. 1–8, and t. xx.Google Scholar
page 454 note 3 Foerste, , Amer. Journ. Sc., vol: xlix, 1920, pp. 26–50, pls. i–iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 454 note 4 Richter, , Neues Jahrb. f. Miner. Geol. Jahrg. 1917, i, pp. 50–72, t. v, vi.Google Scholar
page 454 note 5 Weller, , Bull. No. iv, pt. ii, Nat. Hist. Surv. Chicago Acad. Sc., 1907, pp. 233–50.Google Scholar
page 455 note 1 This subgenus is redefined by Weller, op. cit., p. 247.
page 456 note 1 Barrande, , Syst. Silur. Bohéme, vol. i, p. 599, pl. xxix, figs. 1–13.Google Scholar
page 456 note 2 Foerste, , Ohio Journ. Sc., vol. xvii, No. 7, 1917, p. 254.Google Scholar
page 456 note 3 Schmidt, , Rev. Ostbalt. Trilob. Abt. II (Mem. Arad. Imper. Sc. St. Peiersb., xxxiii, No. 1, 1885), p. 44, t. vi, figs. 1, 2 (? 3–6).Google Scholar
page 456 note 4 Barrande, , op. cit., p. 664, pl. xxviii, figs. 30–44; Gürich, op. cit., t. xx, fig. 9.Google Scholar
page 457 note 1 Ibid., p. 608, pl. xxviii. figs. 14, 15; Gürich, op. cit., t. xx, fig. 7.
page 457 note 2 Gürich, , op. cit., p. 532, t. xviii, figs. 1, la, 6–8, t. xx, fig. 20. W. N. Benson alters the spelling of the name to Craspidarges (Rec. Geol. Surv. N.S. Wales, vol. x, pt. ii, 1922, p. 115).Google Scholar
page 457 note 3 Richter, , Neues Jahrb. f. Miner. Geol. 1917, i, p. 55, t. v, figs. 1, 2, text-figs, 1a–e, pp. 58, 59.Google Scholar
page 457 note 4 Schmidt, , Rev. Ostbalt. Trilob. Abt. II (Mem. Acad. Imper. Sc. St. Petersb., xxxiii, i, 1885), p. 65, t. i, figs. 13, 14.Google Scholar
page 458 note 1 Barrande, , op. cit., Suppl., p. 40, pl. v, fig. 23; pl. vi, figs. 22–6; pl. x, figs. 12–19; Foerate, op. oit. 1920, pl. iii, figs, 7a, b.Google Scholar
page 458 note 2 Bigsby, , Journ. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philad., Ser. I, 4, pt. 2, 1825, p. 365, pl. 23.Google Scholar
page 459 note 1 Clarke, , Mem: 9, New York State Mus., 1908, p. 137, pls. 1, 2, 3.Google Scholar
page 459 note 2 Holzapfel, , Abh. Kon. preuss. geol. Landesanst. N.F., xvi, 1895. p. 32, t. iii, fig. 11; t. xiii, figs. 1–4, 16.Google Scholar
page 459 note 3 Schmidt, , op. cit., p. 49, t. vi, figs. 5–10.Google Scholar
page 460 note 1 Meek, and Worthen, , Geol. Surv. Illinois, iii, 1868, p. 299, pl. i, figs. 6a–c (head only);Google Scholar Foerste, , op. cit. 1920, pp. 29, 32, 33, 42, pl. i, figs. la–g, and references.Google Scholar
page 460 note 2 Reed, , “Lower Palæozoic Trilobites of Girvan”: Palæont. Soc. Suppl. 1914, p. 30.Google Scholar
page 460 note 3 Angelin, , Palæont. Scand., 1854, p. 84, t. xl, fig. 20.Google Scholar
page 460 note 4 Olin, , Chasmopskalk. o. Trimicleusskiff. Skåne (Medd. Lunds Geol. Fältkl., Ser. B, No. 1, 1906), p. 54, t. i. fig. 29.Google Scholar
page 460 note 5 Reed, , “Lower Palæoz. Trilob. Girvan”: Palæont. Soc. Suppl. 1914, p. 12, pl. ii, fig. 5.Google Scholar
page 460 note 6 Etheridge, and Mitchell, , Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vol. xlii, 1917, p. 503.Google Scholar
page 461 note 1 Reed, , Geol. Mag., 1903, p. 3, Pl. I, Fig. 1.Google Scholar
page 461 note 2 ibid., p. 3, Pl. I, Fig. 2.
page 461 note 3 ibid., p. 7, Pl. I, Fig. 6.
page 461 note 4 ibid., p. 9, Pl. I, Figs. 7, 8.
page 461 note 5 Reed, , “Lower Palæoz. Trilob. Girvan”: Palæont. Soc., pt. ii, 1903, p. 96, pl. xiii, figs. 14, 14a; pl. xiv, fig. 1; pt. iii, 1906, p. 97.Google Scholar
page 461 note 6 ibid., Suppl., 1914, p. 28, pl. iv, figs. 9, 10.
page 461 note 7 ibid., pt. iii, 1906, p. 98, pl. xiv, fig. 2.
page 461 note 8 Reed, ,Google Scholar ibid., pt. iii, p. 106, pl. xv, figs. 1–3; ibid., Suppl., p. 30, pl. v, fig. 2.
page 461 note 9 Reed, , op. cit., Suppl., p. 29, pl. v, fig. 1.Google Scholar
page 461 note 10 Foerste, , Amer. Journ. Sc., xlix, 1920, p. 30, pl. iii, figs. 9a, b.Google Scholar
page 461 note 11 Reed, , op. cit., pt. iii, p. 100, pl. xiv, figs. 5–10.Google Scholar
page 461 note 12 ibid., pt. iii, p. 104, pl. xiv, figs. 15, 16.
page 461 note 13 ibid., pt. iii, p. 109, pl. xv, fig. 6.
page 461 note 14 Reed, , Geol. Mag., 1907, pp. 396–400, Pl. XVII.Google Scholar
page 462 note 1 Reed, in Appendix to Gardiner's “Silurian Rocks of May Hill”: Proc. Cottesw. Nat. Field Club, vol. xx, pt. iii, 1920, p. 219, text-figure on p. 222.Google Scholar
page 462 note 2 Barrande, , op. cit., p. 608, pl. xxviii, figs. 33, 34.Google Scholar
page 462 note 3 Reed, , Geol. Mag., 1901, pp. 5–11, Pl. I, Figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
page 462 note 4 Whidborne, , “Mon. Brit. Dev. Fauna”: Palæont. Soc., pt. i, 1888, pl. i, figs. 19, 19a, b.Google Scholar
page 462 note 5 Figures in parentheses refer to bibliography at end of paper.