Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
It has been made eminently clear by Suess1 in his great synthesis of the structure and form of the planet that between those mountain systems which come into contact with one another there are very different types of structural connection. Suess' interpretations of various examples, now famous, are so well known that no repetition is here necessary, Moreover, his brilliant work has invested the subject with a surpassing interest which has led many others to give it their attention. Already the structures of the junctions between many of the world's mountain systems are understood. But the connection between two of the great mountain systems of western North America, the Coast Range of British Columbia and the Cascade Range of Washington, has been largely neglected by geologists, or misinterpreted, if not indeed completely misunderstood. Even Suess' interpretation is open to objections: it fails to separate the two ranges, and to correlate the structures of the Cascades in any way with those of the Interior Plateaux or the Rocky Mountain System.
page 482 note 1 Das Antlitz der Erde, 1883–1909.
page 483 note 1 Abstracts of Dissertations, Stanford University, 1924–1926, vol. i, 1927.Google Scholar
page 484 note 1 There is, of course, no proof that any of the observed deformation resulted from the process of intrusion.
page 486 note 1 Map of New Westminster and Yale districts, Department of Lands, Province of British Columbia, 1914.
page 487 note 1 Brock, R. W., Structure of the Pacific Region of Canada, 1923.Google Scholar