Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:59:37.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Early Mesozoic Plants from the Tanganyika Territory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A. C. Seward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The specimens described in the following pages were submitted to me for examination by Mr. F. R. Parrington, who obtained them “from the hard fine-grained flags in the bed of the Msimbasi River between the junction of a tributary called the Katkindu and the site where reptile remains (? Tangasaurus menneli) were collected about half a mile above the junction, approximately 4° 55′ S. lat.; 38° 57′ long.” (Sketch-map, I.) Though the material is for the most part fragmentary, it is a welcome addition to the palaeobotanical records from tropical Africa. The plants are from the region where Dr. E. O. Teale made a collection, which was described twelve years ago. Specimens from the same district and from beds of the same geological age had previously been described by Potonie. Teale assigned the plant-beds to the middle division of the Tanga series of the Karroo system and Potonié regarded the beds at his “Fundort V”, which corresponds to Mr. Parrington’s locality (sketch-map, I) as Rhaetic-Jura (?). My conclusion was that the plants indicated a Triassic or Rhaetic age. The additional fossils which Mr. Parrington kindly handed to me, though they cannot be said definitely to settle the age of the beds, indicate an Upper Triassic horizon.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 71 , Issue 9 , September 1934 , pp. 385 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 385 note 1 Seward, A. C., “On a small collection of Fossil Plants from the Tanganyika Territory,” Geol. Mag., LIX, 1922, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 385 note 2 Potonié, H., “Fossile Pflanzen aus Deutsch- und Portugiesisch-Ostafrika,” Deutsch-Ostafrilca, 1900, 7.Google Scholar

page 386 note 1 I am indebted to my colleague, Dr. Thomas, for drawing my attention to these and other fossils in his collection, which agree more or less closely with some of Mr. Parrington’s specimens.

page 386 note 2 Feistmantel, O., “Die Karoo-Formation und die dieselbe unterlagernden Schichten,” Abh. k. böhm. Ges. Wiss., vii. Folge, iii, 1889.Google Scholar

page 386 note 3 Fontaine, W. M., “Contributions to the knowledge of the older Mesozoic Flora of Virginia,” pts. 45–7, U.S. Geol. Surv.; Mon, vi, 1883.Google Scholar

page 386 note 4 Walkom, A. B., “The Flora of the Ipswich and Walloon Series,” pt. 2, Queensland Geol. Surv. Publn., No. 259, 1917.Google Scholar

page 386 note 5 Seward, A. C., Fossil Plants, vol. iv, p. 303, 1919.Google Scholar

page 387 note 1 Potonié, loc. cit.Google Scholar

page 387 note 2 Gothan, W. In Potonié’s Lehrbuch der Paläobotanik, (edit. 2) 322. Berlin, 1921.Google Scholar

page 387 note 3 Seward, (1922), pl. xvii, fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 387 note 4 Geinitz, H. B., “Nachträge zur Dyas I,” Mitt. k. Mineralog. Geol. und Praehist. Mus., Dresden, iii, pl. v.Google Scholar

page 387 note 5 du, Toit A. L. “The Fossil Flora of the Upper Karroo Beds,” pl. xxi, fig. 3, Ann. S. African Mus. xxii, pt. 2, 1927.Google Scholar

page 387 note 6 Hörhammer, L., “Über die Coniferen-Gattungen Cheirolepis Schimper und Hirmeriella nov. gen. aus dem Rhät Lias von Franken,” Bibliotheca Botanica, Heft 107, 1933.Google Scholar

page 388 note 1 Potonié, Ioc. cit., p. 10.Google Scholar

page 388 note 2 Seward, (1922), pl. xvii, figs. 8 and 9.Google Scholar

page 388 note 3 Hirmer and Horhammer “Zur weiteren Kenntnis von Cheirolepis und Hirmeriella, etc.,” Palaeontographica, Bd. lxxix, Abt. B, 1934.Google Scholar

page 388 note 4 Seward, A. C, Fossil Plants, iii, 1917, 278.Google Scholar

page 389 note 1 Thomas, H. H., “On some new and rare Jurassic plants from Yorkshire: Eretmophyllum, a new type of Ginkgoalean leaf,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., xvii, pt. 3, 256.Google Scholar

page 389 note 2 Kryshtofovitch, , “Some Fossil Plants from the Jurassic State of North Caucasus,” Izvestia Geol. Kom., 1926, 45 v.Google Scholar

page 389 note 3 Schlüter, and Schmidt, , “Voltzia, Yuccites und andere neue Funde aus dem südhannoverschen Buntsandstein,” Neues Jahrb. Min. Beilageband, 57, Abt. B, 1927.Google Scholar

page 389 note 4 Halle, T. G., “A Gymnosperm, with Cordaitean-like leaves from the Rhaetic beds of Scania,” Arkiv. Bot., Bd. 9, 1910.Google Scholar

page 391 note 1 Seward, loc. cit. (1922) p. 391.Google Scholar

page 391 note 2 Robertson, L. S., “Report on some Fossil Plants collected in Tanganyika Territory,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xc, 1934, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 391 note 3 Potonié, , loc. cit.; localities III and IV are his localities IV and II.Google Scholar

page 391 note 4 Toit, A. L. du, loc. cit., p. 367.Google Scholar

page 391 note 5 Haughton, S. H., “Reptilian remains from the Karroo beds of E. Africa,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxx, 1924, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 391 note 6 Mennell, F. P., “The Karroo System in East and Central Africa,” Int. Geol. Congress, 1929, 263.Google Scholar

page 392 note 1 Teale, E. o., “Provisional Geological Hap of Tanganyika with explanatory notes,” Geol. Surv. Dept. Bull., No. 6.Google Scholar

page 392 note 2 Zeiller, R., Bassin houiller et Permien de Blanzy et Creusot, Paris, 1906.Google Scholar