Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:08:13.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of some species of Favistina, Nyctopora, and Calapoecia (Ordovician corals from North America)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. K. Jull
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Summary

Material from the H. A. Nicholson collection, University of Aberdeen, provides information on three of Nicholson's species. Syntypes of Favistina calicina are described and the lectotype designated. Topotypes of Nyctopora billingsii are compared with an earlier description of the type thin sections. Columnopora cribriformis is considered synonymous with Calapoecia huronensis Billings, itself a poorly understood species; redescription of the type of the latter species shows it to be separate from C. canadensis Billings. Calapoecia ungava Cox is reinterpreted with a lectotype designated, and Nicholson material is placed with this species. All specimens are from eastern North America and of Upper Ordovician age excluding the Middle Ordovician N. billingsii and C. canadensis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassler, R. S. 1915. Bibliographic index of American Ordovician and Silurian fossils. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 92,(1)1718, (2)7191521.Google Scholar
Bassler, R. S. 1950. Faunal lists and descriptions of Paleozoic corals.Mem. geol. Soc. Amer. 44,1315.Google Scholar
Bolton, T. E., 1960. Catalogue of Type Invertebrate Fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada. 1. 215 pp., Geol. Surv. Can., Ottawa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, R. G. 1965. Some Upper Cincinnatian (Ordovician) colonial corals of north-central Kentucky. J. Paleont. 39, 1177–91.Google Scholar
Cox, I. 1936. Revision of the genus Calapoecia Billings. Bull natn. Mus. Can. 80, 148.Google Scholar
Dyer, W. S. 1925. The stratigraphy and paleontology of Toronto and vicinity. Part 5.The paleontology of the Credit River section. Thirty-second Ann. Rep. Ont. Dep. Min. 32, (7), 4788.Google Scholar
Fedorowski, I. & Jull, R. K. (1976). Review of blastogeny in Palaeozoic corals and description of lateral increase in some Upper Ordovician rugose corals. Ada palaeont. pol. 21, 3778.Google Scholar
Flower, R. H. 1961. Montoya and related colonial corals Organisms attached to Montoya corals.Mem. Inst. Mi Technol. New Mex. 7, 1229.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1909. Preliminary notes on Cincinnatian fossils. Bull scient. Labs Denison Univ. 14, 285355.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1916. Notes on Cincinnatian fossil types. Bull scient. Labs Denison Univ. 18, 285355.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. F. 1924. Upper Ordovician faunas of Ontario and Quebec. Mem. geol. Surv. Can. 138, 1255.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1961. On the Ordovician corals Palaeophyllum rugosum Billings and Nyctopora billingsii Nicholson. Bull geol. Surv. Can. 80, 17.Google Scholar
Hill, D. & Stumm, E. C. 1956. Tabulata. In Moore, R. C. (Ed.): Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part F. Coelenterata, pp. 444–77. Geol. Soc. Amer. & Univ.Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Jull, R. K. (1976). Septal development during hystero-ontogeny in the Ordovician tabulate coral Foerstephyllum. J. Paleont. 50, 380–91.Google Scholar
Lambe, L. M. 1899. A revision of the genera and species of Canadian Palaeozoic corals. Contr. Can. Palaeont. 4(1), 196.Google Scholar
Lambe, L. M. 1901. A revision of the genera and species of Canadian Palaeozoic corals. Contr. Can. Palaeont. 4 (2), 97197.Google Scholar
Liberty, B. A. 1969. Palaeozoic geology of the Lake Simcoe area, Ontario. Mem. geol. Surv. Can. 355, 201 pp.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1874. On Columnopora, a new genus of tabulate corals. Geol. Mag. N.S. (2), 1, 153154.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1875 (a). On Favistella stellata and Favistella calicina, with notes on the affinities of Favistella and allied genera. Rep. Br. Ass. Advmt. Sci. 44 meeting (Belfast, 1874), Notices and Abstr., pp. 8990.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1875(b). On Favistella stellata and Favistella calicina, with notes on the affinities of Favistella and allied genera. Geol. Mag. N.S. (2), 2, 279.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1875(c). Report on the palaeontology of the Province of Ontario. 98 p., Hunter, Rose&Co., Toronto.Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1875(d). Description of the corals of the Silurian and Devonian systems. Rep. geol. Surv. Ohio, Palaeont. 2 (2), 181242. [The foregoing four references are not necessarily in order of date of issue.]Google Scholar
Nicholson, H. A. 1879. On the Structure and Affinities of the Tabulate Corals of the Palaeozoic Period. 342 pp. Wm. Blackwood&Sons, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Preobrazhensky, B.&Klaamann, E. 1975. Vzaimootnosheniya mezhdu rodami Sarcinula, Calapoecia i Lyopora (Tabulata). Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim. 24, Koide Keemia Geol.(2), 130–36.Google Scholar
Rominger, C. 1876. Palaeontology. Fossil corals. Geol. Surv. Mich, 3 (2), 1161.Google Scholar
Troedsson, G. T. 1928. On the Middle and Upper Ordovician faunas of northern Green-land. II. General faunas. Meddr. Grønland 72, 197.Google Scholar
Windle, P. N., Augustynek, R. M. & Nitecki, M. H. 1973. Catalogue of type and referred specimens of fossil corals in the Field Museum of Natural History. Fieldiana, Geol. 32, 195.Google Scholar