Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T12:30:52.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pyrite framboids interpreted as microbial colonies within the Permian Zoophycos spreiten from southeastern Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2007

YI-MING GONG ,
GUANG R. SHI ,
ELIZABETH A. WELDON ,
YUAN-SHENG DU  and
RAN XU
YI-MING GONG*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education; State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China Institute of Resources and Environment; Key Laboratory of Biogenic Traces and Sedimentary Minerals of Henan Province, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454003, China
GUANG R. SHI
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education; State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
ELIZABETH A. WELDON
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education; State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
YUAN-SHENG DU
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education; State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China
RAN XU
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology of Ministry of Education; State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China
*
§Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two types of pyrite framboids (PF, probably sulphate-reducing bacteria) have been found within the Zoophycos spreiten, hosted in the Guadalupian (Middle Permian) glaciomarine greywacke of the Westley Park Sandstone Member within the Broughton Formation from the southern Sydney Basin of southeastern Australia. They are composed of non-sheathed (PF1) and sheathed (PF2) sub-micron balls, respectively. Chemically, the sub-micron balls consist of iron, sulphur, carbon and oxygen. Both PF1 and PF2 occur in rhythmic alternation within the thick, light-grey and thin, dark-grey minor lamellae of Zoophycos spreiten. The framboids from the minor lamellae are highly abundant and occur in an orderly arrangement of equal density and in a good state of preservation. Within Zoophycos spreiten no homogeneous filling, fecal pellets, or any sign of re-exploitation of the minor lamellae have been recognized. No similar framboids have been observed outside Zoophycos spreiten. Therefore, the framboids are interpreted as the pyritized remains of microbial colonies within Zoophycos spreiten. The trace Zoophycos would be a multifunctional garden that may have been carefully constructed by the Zoophycos maker, where different microbial colonies were orderly and carefully planted and cultured within different minor lamellae. Further, it is proposed that the Zoophycos maker had a symbiotic relationship with microbial colonies on the mutual basis of food supply and redox conditions. The fact that the overlying spreiten cut the underlying ones indicates that the Zoophycos from the study area is of an upward construction. The rhythmic alternation of both the thick, light-grey and thin, dark-grey minor lamellae within Zoophycos spreiten may be suggestive of a gardening manner of the Zoophycos maker responding to the warm and cold changes, food supply in pulses and variations of sedimentation rate for planting and culturing microbial colonies under the conditions of a glaciomarine environment at the high latitudes.

Keywords

Zoophycospyrite framboidsmicrobial colonyethologyPermianAustralia
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 145 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 95 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bann, G. R. & Jones, B. G. 2001. The Coolangatta Latite Member and associated tuffs: newly identified basal units in the Gerringong Volcanics, southern Sydney Basin, NSW. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 123, 23–37.Google Scholar
Bottjer, D. J., Droser, M. L. & Jablonski, D. 1988. Palaeoenvironmental trends in the history of trace fossils. Nature 333, 252–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, R. G. 1991. Zoophycos: Strip mine, refuse dump, cache or sewage farm? Lethaia 24, 460–2.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G., Ekdale, A. A. & Asgaard, U. 1999. Zoophycos in the Upper Cretaceous chalk of Denmark and Sweden. Greifswalder Geowissenschaftliche Beiträge 6, 133–42.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. & Hanken, N.-M. 2003. Structure and function of large, lobed Zoophycos, Pliocene of Rhodes, Greece. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, I. B. & Rickard, D. 2000. Framboidal pyrite formation via the oxidation of iron (II) monosulfide by hydrogen sulphide. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 64, 2665–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crimes, T. P. 1987. Trace fossils and correlation of late Precambrian and early Cambrian strata. Geological Magazine 124, 97–119.Google Scholar
Dove, P. M., De Yoreo, J. J. & Weiner, S. 2003. Biomineralization, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, vol. 54 (series ed. Rosso, J. J.). Washington, DC: The Mineralogical Society of America, 381 pp.Google Scholar
Ekdale, A. A. & Bromley, R. G. 1983. Trace fossils and ichnofabric in the Kjolby Gaard Marl, Upper Cretaceous, Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 31, 107–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekdale, A. A. & Lewis, D. W. 1991. The New Zealand Zoophycos revisited: morphology, ethology and paleoecology. Ichnos 1, 183–94.Google Scholar
Folk, R. L. 2005. Nannobacteria and the formation of framboidal pyrite: textural evidence. Journal of Earth System Science 114, 369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S. & Werner, F. 1995. Is Zoophycos a feeding trace? Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen 195, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Guinea, J., Martinez-Frias, J., Gonzales-Martin, R. & Zamora, L. 1997. Framboidal pyrites in antique books. Nature 388, 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javaux, E. J., Knoll, A. H. & Walter, M. R. 2004. TEM evidence for eukaryotic diversity in mid-Proterozoic oceans. Geobiology 2, 121–32.Google Scholar
Jumars, P. A., Mayer, L. M., Deming, J. W., Baross, J. A. & Wheatcroft, R. A. 1990. Deep-sea deposit-feeding strategies suggested by environmental and feeding constraints. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London A331, 85–101.Google Scholar
Kotake, N. 1989. Paleoecology of the Zoophycos producers. Lethaia 22, 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotake, N. 1991. Non-selective surface deposit feeding by the Zoophycos producers. Lethaia 24, 379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, L. G. 1957. Micro-organisms and the presence of syngenetic pyrite. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 113, 429–40.Google Scholar
Love, L. G. 1962. Biogenic primary sulphide of the Permian Kupferschiefer and Marl Slate. Economic Geology 57, 350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwemark, L., Lin, I.-T., Wang, C.-H., Huh, C.-A., Wei, K.-Y. & Chen, C.-W. 2004. Ethology of the Zoophycos-producer: Arguments against the gardening model from δ13Corg evidences of the spreiten material. TAO (Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences) 15, 713–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwemark, L., Lin, H. L. & Sarnthein, M. 2006. Temporal variations of the trace fossil Zoophycos in a 425 ka long sediment record from the South China Sea: implications for the ethology of the Zoophycos producer. Geological Magazine 143, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwemark, L. & Schäfer, P. 2003. Ethological implications from a detailed X-ray radiograph and 14C study of the modern deep-sea Zoophycos. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maniloff, J. 1997. Nannobacteria: size limits and evidence. Science 276, 1776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marintsch, E. J. & Finks, R. M. 1982. Lower Devonian ichnofacies at Highland Mills, New York and their gradual replacement across environmental gradients. Journal of Paleontology 56, 1050–78.Google Scholar
Miller, M. F. 1991. Morphology and paleoenvironmental distribution of Paleozoic Spirophyton and Zoophycos: implications for the Zoophycos ichnofacies. Palaios 6, 410–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. III. 2003. Paleobiology of complex trace fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. & D'Alberto, L. 2001. Paleoethologic implications of Zoophycos from Late Cretaceous and Paleocene limestones of the Venetian Prealps, northeastern Italy. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 166, 237–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohfuji, H. & Rickard, D. 2005. Experimental syntheses of framboids – a review. Earth-Science Reviews 71, 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivero, D. 1996. Zoophycos distribution and sequence stratigraphy. Examples from Jurassic to Cretaceous deposits in southeastern France. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 123, 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivero, D. 2003. Early Jurassic to Late Cretaceous evolution of Zoophycos in the French Subalpine Basin (southern France). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, R., Kinkle, B. K. & Badescu, A. 2004. Pyrite framboids as biomarkers for iron-sulfur system. Geomicrobiology Journal 21, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, D. T. 1970. The origin of framboids. Lithos 3, 269–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roychoudhury, A. N., Kostka, J. E. & Cappellen, P. V. 2003. Pyritization: a palaeoenvironmental and redox proxy reevaluated. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 1183–93.Google Scholar
Rust, G. W. 1935. Colloidal primary copper ores at Cornwall Mines, southeastern Missouri. Journal of Geology 43, 398–426.Google Scholar
Savrda, C. E. & Bottjer, D. J. 1994. Ichnofossils and ichnofabrics in rhythmically bedded pelagic/hemi-pelagic carbonates: recognition and evaluation of benthic redox and scour cycles. International Association of Sedimentologists, Special Publication 19, 195–210.Google Scholar
Schieber, J. 2002. Sedimentary pyrite: a window into the microbial past. Geology 30, 531–4.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneiderhöhn, H. 1923. Chalkographische Untersuchung des Mansfelder Kupferschiefers. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie 47, 1–38.Google Scholar
Schouten, C. 1946. The role of sulphur bacteria in the formation of the so-called sedimentary copper ores and pyritic ore bodies. Economic Geology 41, 517–38.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1967 a. Bathymetry of trace fossils. Marine Geology 5, 413–28.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1967 b. Fossil behavior. Scientific American 217, 72–80.Google Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1986. Evolution of behavior as expressed in marine trace fossils. In Evolution of Animal Behavior, Paleontological and Field Approaches (eds Nitecki, M. H. & Kitchell, J. E.), pp. 62–87. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. 1970. Notes on Zoophycos and Spirophyton. In Trace Fossils (eds Crimes, T. P. & Harper, J. C.), pp. 505–14. Geological Journal (Special Issue) 3.Google Scholar
Sweeney, R. E. & Kaplan, I. R. 1973. Pyrite framboids formation: laboratory synthesis and marine sediments. Economic Geology 68, 618–34.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. G. & Macquaker, J. H. S. 2000. Early diagenetic pyrite morphology in a mudstone-dominated succession: the Lower Jurassic Cleveland Ironstone Formation, eastern England. Sedimentary Geology 131, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchman, A. 1999. Ichnology of the Rhenodanubian Flysch (Lower Cretaceous–Eocene) in Austria and Germany. Beringeria 25, 65–171.Google Scholar
Uchman, A. & Demircan, H. 1999. A Zoophycos group trace fossil from Miocene flysch in southern Turkey: evidence for a U-shaped causative burrow. Ichnos 6, 251–9.Google Scholar
Wetzel, A. 1991. Ecologic interpretation of deep-sea trace fossil communities. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 85, 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, A. & Werner, F. 1981. Morphology and ecological significance of Zoophycos in deep-sea sediments off NW Africa. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 32, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wignall, P. B., Newton, R. & Brookfield, M. E. 2005. Pyrite framboid evidence for oxygen-poor deposition during the Permian–Triassic crisis in Kashmir. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 216, 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkin, R. T., Arthur, M. A. & Dean, W. E. 1997. History of water column anoxia in the Black Sea indicated by pyrite framboid size distributions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 148, 517–25.Google Scholar
Wilkin, R. T. & Barnes, H. L. 1997. Formation processes of framboidal pyrite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61, 323–39.Google Scholar
Wilkin, R. T., Barnes, H. L. & Brantley, S. L. 1996. The size distribution of framboidal pyrite in modern sediments: an indicator of redox conditions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60, 3897–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar