Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:22:44.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pseudofossils from the Precambrian, including ‘Buschmannia’ and ‘Praesolenopora’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

M. F. Glaessner
Affiliation:
Centre for Precambrian Research, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

Debrenne, F. & Lafuste, J. G. 1979. Buschmannia roeringi (Kaever & Richter, 1976) a so-called archaeocyatha, and the problem of the Precambrian or Cambrian age of the Nama System (S.W. Africa). Geol. Mag. 116, 143–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germs, G. J. B. 1972. New shelly fossils from Nama Group, Southwest Africa. Am. J. Sci. 272, 752–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1963. Zur Kenntnis der Nama-Fossilien Südwest-Afrikas. Annln. Naturh. Mus. Wien 66, 113–20.Google Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1976. Early Phanerozoic annelid worms and their geological and biological significance. J. geol. Soc. (Lond.) 132, 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1978. Re-examination of Archaeichnium, a fossil from the Nama Group. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 74 (13), 335–42.Google Scholar
Hartnady, C. J. 1978. The age of orogenic episodes in the Pan-African mobile belts fringing the Kalahari craton: A review of new evidence. 14th and 15th Ann. Rep., Chamber of Mines Precamb. Res. Unit, Dept. Geol. Univ. Cape Town, pp. 151–62.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1972. Archaeocyatha In Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, 2nd ed., E1, Teichert, C. (ed.). Geology Society of America, Univ. Kansas.Google Scholar
Kaever, M. & Richter, P. 1976. Buschmannia roeringi n.gen., n.sp. (Archaeocyatha) aus der Nama-Gruppe Südwestafrikas, Paläont. Z. 50 (1/2), 2733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröner, A. 1978. Geochronology and some observations on the geology of the Pan-African orogenic belts. 14th and 15th Ann. Rep., Chamber of Mines Precamb. Res. Unit, Dept. Geol. Univ. Cape Town, pp. 208–10.Google Scholar
Lian, Yü-tso , (Liang Yu-Zhou) & Tsao, Rui-chi. 1976. Biostratigraphic Significance of Stromatolites and Red Algae from the Sinian Subera of China, pp. 117. Peking.Google Scholar
Martin, H. 1965. The Precambrian geology of South-West Africa and Namaqualand. Precambr. Res. Unit Univ. Cape Town, pp. 1159.Google Scholar
Tsao, Rui-chi & Liang, Yu-zhan, 1974. On the classification and correlation of the Sinian System in China, based on a study of algae and stromatolites. Mem. Nanking Inst. Geol. Pal. 5, 116 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Tsao, Rui-chi , (Cao Ruiji) & Zhao, Wenjie, 1978. Manicosiphoniaceae, a new family of fossil algae from the Sinian System of SW China with reference to its systematic position. Acta Palaeont. Sinica 17 (1), 2940 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Walker, R. N., Muir, M. D., Diver, W. L., Williams, N. & Wilkins, N. 1977. Evidence of major sulphate evaporite deposits in the Proterozoic McArthur Group, Northern Territory, Australia. Nature, Lond. 265, 526–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar