Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T22:27:37.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problems of Ammonite Nomenclature

IX. The Genus Stephanoceras, Waagen, and Some Allied Genera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The tendency among some modern authors to suppress the well-known genus Stephanoceras, Waagen, 1869, is due to sundry misconceptions, combined occasionally with a complete disregard of the Rules of Nomenclature. This raises matters of general interest, and thus a review of the vicissitudes of that genus and a discussion of some related questions may be acceptable to all palaeontologists.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 230 note 1 Les Ammonites jurassiques et crétacées: Essai de genera. Paris, 1938, p. 187.Google Scholar

page 230 note 2 Aalénien et Bajocien du Mâconnais, etc. Trav. Lab. Geol. Lyon., fasc, xxxv, Mem. 29, 1939, p. 174.Google Scholar

page 231 note 1 Études sur les Cardioceratidés, etc. Mém. Soc. géol. France, Pal. Mem. No. 45, 1912, p. 29. Henri Douvilte's notes of 1899, referred to by his son, do not count as a publication.Google Scholar

page 231 note 2 Jura-Ablagerungen zwischen Rybinsk, Mologa & Myschkin, etc. Mém. Acad. Sci. St. Pétersb., ser. vii, vol. xxviii, no. 5, 1881, p. 68.Google Scholar

page 231 note 3 Versteinerungen Württembergs, 1830-1833.Google Scholar

page 231 note 4 Aaténien et Bajocien du Maconnais, etc. Trav. Lab. géol. Lyon, fasc. xxxv, Mem. no. 29, 1939, p. 208, pl. vi, figs. 8a, b.Google Scholar

page 231 note 5 Les Ammonites du Bajocien d'Alsace et de Loraine. Mém. Carte géol. Alsace-Loraine; no. 5, 1937, p. 83.Google Scholar

page 231 note 6 In accordance with Art. 14a this automatically becomes coronatus.Google Scholar

page 232 note 1 See Chenu: Manuel de Conchyliogie, etc., vol. i, 1859 p. 89Google Scholar;compare also Wright, “Lias Ammonites,” pt. 3. Man. Pal. Soc., vol. 34 (1880), p. 191.Google Scholar

page 232 note 2 Handbuch der Palaeontologie, vol. i, pt. ii, fasc. 3, 1884, p. 469.Google Scholar

page 232 note 3 Ammoniten des Schwabischen Jura, vol. ii, 1886, p. 509.Google Scholar

page 232 note 4 Über Macrocephaliten im Terrain-à-chailles. Abh. Schweiz. Pal. Gesellsch., xxi, 1894, p. 15.Google Scholar

page 232 note 5 Sur la possibilité d'admettre un dimorphism sexuel chez les Ammonitidés. Bull. Soc. géol. France, ser. 3, xx, 1893, p. clxxii.Google Scholar

page 232 note 6 Buckman and Bather: Can the Sexes in Ammonites be distinguished? Natural Science, iv, 1894, 427432.Google Scholar