Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:53:13.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A primitive sauropodomorph from the upper Elliot Formation of Lesotho

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2010

F. KNOLL*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
*

Abstract

A well-preserved, articulated dinosaur skeleton from southern Africa is described. The specimen comes from the upper Elliot Formation (?Hettangian) of Ha Ralekoala (Lesotho) and represents a new species: Ignavusaurus rachelis genus et species nova. A cladistic analysis suggests that Ignavusaurus is more derived than Thecodontosaurus–Pantydraco, but more primitive than Efraasia. Ignavusaurus indeed shares a number of unambiguous synapomorphies with the taxa more derived than Thecodontosaurus–Pantydraco, such as a fully open acetabulum, but it is more plesiomorphic than Efraasia and more derived sauropodomorphs as shown by the evidence of, for instance, the distal extremity of its tibia that is is longer (cranio-caudally) than wide (latero-medially). The discovery of Ignavusaurus increases the known diversity of the early sauropodomorph fauna of the upper Elliot Formation, which stands as one of the richest horizons in the world in this respect.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. F., Hall-Martin, A. & Russell, D. A. 1985. Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs. Journal of Zoology, Series A 207, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, P. M. 2000. Prosauropod dinosaurs and iguanas: speculations on the diets of extinct reptiles. In Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates: Perspectives from the Fossil Record (ed. Sues, H.-D.), pp. 4278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, P. M. 2004. Sauropodomorph dinosaur diversity in the upper Elliot Formation (Massospondylus range zone: Lower Jurassic) of South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100, 501–3.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. M. 2009. A new basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the upper Elliot Formation (Lower Jurassic) of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29, 1032–45.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. M. & Upchurch, P. 2007. The evolution of feeding mechanisms in early sauropodomorph dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology 77, 91112.Google Scholar
Barrett, P. M., Upchurch, P., Zhou, X.-D. & Wang, X.-L. 2007. The skull of Yunnanosaurus huangi Young, 1942 (Dinosauria: Prosauropoda) from the Lower Lufeng Formation (Lower Jurassic) of Yunnan, China. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 150, 319–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, P. M. & Yates, A. M. 2006. New information on the palate and lower jaw of Massospondylus (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha). Palaeontologia Africana 41, 123–30.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. & Pumares, J. A. 1995. Notas sobre el primer cráneo de Riojasaurus incertus (Dinosauria, Prosauropoda, Melanosauridae) del Triásico superior de La Rioja, Argentina. Ameghiniana 32, 341–9.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. & Vince, M. 1979. El hallazgo del primer nido de dinosaurios triasicos, (Saurischia, Prosauropoda), Triásico superior de Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana 16, 173–82.Google Scholar
Broom, R. 1911. On the dinosaurs of the Stormberg, South Africa. Annals of the South African Museum 7, 291308.Google Scholar
Calendini, F. & Martin, J.-F. 2005. PaupUP: A free graphical frontend for Paup* Dos software. Version 1.0.3.1. Montpellier: J.-F. Martin.Google Scholar
Callison, G. & Quimby, H. M. 1984. Tiny dinosaurs: are they fully grown? Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 3, 200–9.Google Scholar
Chinsamy, A. 1993. Bone histology and growth trajectory of the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen. Modern Geology 18, 319–29.Google Scholar
Chinsamy-Turan, A. 2005. The Microstructure of Dinosaur Bone: Deciphering Biology with Fine-scale Techniques. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 195 pp.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H. 1964. Relationships of the saurischian dinosaurs. American Museum Novitates 2181, 124.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. R. 1981. The prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen from Zimbabwe: its biology, mode of life and phylogenetic significance. Occasional Papers of the National Museums and Monuments, Rhodesia, Series B 6, 689840.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M. 1976. Prosauropod dinosaurs (Reptilia: Saurischia) of North America. Postilla 169, 198.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M. 1990. Basal Sauropodomorpha – Prosauropoda. In The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmólska, H.), pp. 320–44. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M. 1999. Sex, sacra and Sellosaurus gracilis (Saurischia, Sauropodomorpha, Upper Triassic, Germany) – or why the character “two sacral vertebrae” is plesiomorphic for Dinosauria. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 213, 1955.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M. & Upchurch, P. 2004. Prosauropoda. In The Dinosauria. Second Edition (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmólska, H.), pp. 232–58. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M., Van Heerden, J. & Yates, A. M. 2005. Postcranial anatomy of referred specimens of the sauropodomorph dinosaur Melanorosaurus from the Upper Triassic of South Africa. In Thunder-Lizards: the Sauropodomorph Dinosaurs (eds Tidwell, V. & Carpenter, K.), pp. 137. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Galton, P. M., Yates, A. M. & Kermack, D. 2007. Pantydraco n. gen. for Thecodontosaurus caducus Yates, 2003, a basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Upper Triassic or Lower Jurassic of South Wales, UK. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 243, 119–25.Google Scholar
Gauffre, F.-X. 1993. The most recent Melanorosauridae (Saurischia, Prosauroda), Lower Jurassic of Lesotho, with remarks on the prosauropod phylogeny. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 11, 648–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, C. E., Kitching, J. W. & Raath, M. A. 1990. Skulls of the prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen in the collections of the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research. Palaeontologia Africana 27, 4558.Google Scholar
Haughton, S. H. 1924. The fauna and stratigraphy of the Stormberg Series. Annals of the South African Museum 12, 323497.Google Scholar
Huene, F. von. 1932. Die fossile Reptil-Ordnung Saurischia, ihre Entwicklung und Geschichte. Monographien für Geologie und Paläontologie 4, 1361.Google Scholar
Irmis, R. B. 2007. Axial skeleton ontogeny in the Parasuchia (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) and its implications for ontogenetic determination in archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27, 350–61.Google Scholar
Irmis, R. B. & Knoll, F. 2008. New ornithischian dinosaur material from the Lower Jurassic Lufeng Formation of China. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 247, 117–28.Google Scholar
Knoll, F. 2005. The tetrapod fauna of the Upper Elliot and Clarens formations in the main Karoo Basin (South Africa and Lesotho). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 176, 8191.Google Scholar
Kutty, T. S., Chatterjee, S., Galton, P. M. & Upchurch, P. 2007. Basal sauropodomorphs (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Lower Jurassic of India: their anatomy and relationships. Journal of Paleontology 81, 1552–74.Google Scholar
Langer, M. C. 2003. The pelvic and hind limb anatomy of the stem-sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim (Late Triassic, Brazil). PaleoBios 23, 140.Google Scholar
Langer, M. C., Ezcurra, M. D., Bittencourt, J. S. & Novas, F. E. 2009. The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs. Biological Reviews 84, 156.Google Scholar
Martinez, R. N. & Alcober, O. A. 2009. A basal sauropodomorph (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Ischigualasto Formation (Triassic, Carnian) and the early evolution of Sauropodomorpha. PLoS One 4, e4397.Google Scholar
Moser, M. 2003. Plateosaurus engelhardti Meyer, 1837 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) aus dem Feuerletten (Mittelkeuper; Obertrias) von Bayern. Zitteliana, Reihe B 24, 3186.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1842. Report on British Fossil Reptiles. Part II. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1841, pp. 60–204. Plymouth, England.Google Scholar
Owen, R. 1854. Descriptive catalogue of the fossil organic remains of Reptilia and Pisces contained in the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. London: Taylor and Francis, 184 pp.Google Scholar
Pol, D. & Powell, J. E. 2005. Anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Mussaurus patagonicus (Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of Patagonia. In II Congreso Latinoamericano de Paleontología de Vertebrados: Boletim de Resumos (eds Kellner, A. W. A., Henriques, D. D. R. & Rodrigues, T.), pp. 208–9. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional.Google Scholar
Pol, D. & Powell, J. E. 2007. Skull anatomy of Mussaurus patagonicus (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Late Triassic of Patagonia. Historical Biology 19, 125–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raath, M. A. 1972 Fossil vertebrate studies in Rhodesia: a new dinosaur (Reptilia: Saurischia) from near the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Arnoldia 5, 137.Google Scholar
Reisz, R. R., Scott, D., Sues, H.-D., Evans, D. C. & Raath, M. A. 2005. Embryos of an Early Jurassic prosauropod dinosaur and their evolutionary significance. Science 309, 761–4.Google Scholar
Ricqlès, A. de, Padian, K., Knoll, F. & Horner, J. R. 2008. On the origin of high growth rates in archosaurs and their ancient relatives: complementary histological studies on Triassic archosauriforms and the problem of a “phylogenetic signal” in bone histology. Annales de Paléontologie 94, 5776.Google Scholar
Seeley, H. G. 1888. On the classification of the fossil animals commonly named Dinosauria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 43, 165–71.Google Scholar
Sereno, P. C. 1998. A rationale for phylogenetic definitions, with application to the higher level taxonomy of Dinosauria. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 210, 4183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sereno, P. C. 2007. Basal Sauropodomorpha: historical and recent phylogenetic hypotheses, with comments on Ammosaurus major (Marsh, 1889). Special Papers in Palaeontology 77, 261–89.Google Scholar
Smith, N. D. & Pol, D. 2007. Anatomy of a basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Early Jurassic Hanson Formation of Antarctica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52, 657–74.Google Scholar
Sues, H.-D., Reisz, R. R., Hinic, S. & Raath, M. A. 2004. On the skull of Massospondylus carinatus Owen, 1854 (Dinosauria: Sauropodomorpha) from the Elliot and Clarens formations (Lower Jurassic) of South Africa. Annals of Carnegie Museum 73, 239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Upchurch, P. 1997. Prosauropoda. In Encyclopaedia of Dinosaurs (eds Currie, P. J. & Padian, K.), pp. 599606. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M. & Galton, P. M. 2007. A phylogenetic analysis of basal sauropodomorph relationships: implications for the origin of sauropod dinosaurs. Special Papers in Palaeontology 77, 5790.Google Scholar
Upchurch, P., Barrett, P. M., Zhao, X. & Xu, X. 2007. A re-evaluation of Chinshakiangosaurus chunghoensis Ye vide Dong 1992 (Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha): implications for cranial evolution in basal sauropod dinosaurs. Geological Magazine 144, 247–62.Google Scholar
Van Heerden, J. 1979. The morphology and taxonomy of Euskelosaurus (Reptilia: Saurischia: Late Triassic) from South Africa. Navorsinge van die Nasionale Museum Bloemfontein 4, 2184.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, C. C. & Yates, A. M. 2004. Sauropodomorph biodiversity of the upper Elliot Formation (Lower Jurassic) of southern Africa. In Geoscience Africa 2004: Abstract Volume (ed. Ashwal, L. D.), p. 670. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Whiteside, D. I. & Marshall, J. E. A. 2008. The age, fauna and palaeoenvironment of the Late Triassic fissure deposits of Tytherington, South Gloucestershire, UK. Geological Magazine 145, 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. A. & Sereno, P. C. 1998. Early evolution and higher-level phylogeny of sauropod dinosaurs. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Memoir 5, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, A. M. 2003. A new species of the primitive dinosaur Thecodontosaurus (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) and its implications for the systematics of early dinosaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 1, 142.Google Scholar
Yates, A. M. 2007 a. Solving a dinosaurian puzzle: the identity of Aliwalia rex Galton. Historical Biology 19, 93123.Google Scholar
Yates, A. M. 2007 b. The first complete skull of the Triassic dinosaur Melanorosaurus Haughton (Sauropodomorpha:Anchisauria). Special Papers in Palaeontology 77, 955.Google Scholar
Yates, A. M., Bonnan, M. F. & Neveling, J. 2007. A new diverse dinosaur assemblage from the Early Jurassic of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27 (3, supplement), 169A.Google Scholar
Yates, A. M., Hancox, P. J. & Rubidge, B. S. 2004. First record of a sauropod dinosaur from the upper Elliot Formation (Early Jurassic) of South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100, 504–6.Google Scholar