Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:12:26.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-eruptive mechanical sorting of pyroclastic material — an example from Jamaica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

M. J. Roobol
Affiliation:
Dept. de Geologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal 101, Canada

Summary

The unfossiliferous Maestrichtian Summerfield Formation of Central Jamaica is composed entirely of hornblende andesite. A measured section shows a 90 m-thick lower unit of greenish-grey, crystal-rich, pumice-poor sandstones and rare mudstones, which interdigitate with shallow-marine rudist limestone. The upper 370 m comprise pink-coloured, pumice-rich fluviatile sandstones and conglomerates with devitrified ignimbrites at two horizons. Although no lavas are exposed it is likely that the erupted magma is represented by the hornblende andesite boulders of the conglomerates. Whole rock chemical analyses show the lava boulders to have around 65% SiO2 the ignimbrites 62%, the shallow-marine crystal-rich sandstones 58% and the interstratified mudstones 69%. The marine sandstones are concentrations of phenocrysts and the mudstones represent the finest glassy ash — originally the liquid which coexisted with the phenocrysts before eruption. These variations illustrate that after leaving the vent the pyroclastic material lost much fine glassy ash during the pyroclastic flow stage to produce crystal-enriched ignimbrites. Where the pyroclastic material was deposited in a shallow- marine environment it underwent further mechanical separation with loss of pumice by flotation, lithics and separation into crystals (sandstones) and glassy ash (mudstones). Subtraction of glass (rnudstone) from the magma (conglomerate boulders) shows that the ignimbrite composition can be obtained by loss of around 40 wt. % of glassy ash. The crystal-rich marine sandstones – although no longer containing the phenocryst minerals in their original magmatic proportions – represent a loss of about 60 wt. % glassy ash.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryhill, H. L. 1965. Geology of the Ciales Quadrangle, Puerto Rico. Bull. U.S. geol. Surv. 1184, 116 pp.Google Scholar
Coates, A. G. 1968. The geology of the Cretaceous Inlier around Arthur's Seat, Clarendon, Jamaica. Trans, 4th Carib. Geol. Conf. Trinidad, held 1965, 309315.Google Scholar
Fiske, R. S. & Matsuda, T. 1964. Submarine equivalents of ash flows in the Tokiwa Formation, Japan. Am. Jl Sci. 262, 76106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, L., III, 1971. Geology of the Coamo Area, Puerto Rico, and its relation to the volcanic arc-trench association. Prof. Paper U.S. geol. Surv. 636, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Greiner, H. R. 1965. The oil and gas potential of Jamaica. Bull. geol. Survey. Dept Jamaica No. 5, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Hay, R. L. 1959. Formation of the crystal-rich glowing avalanche deposit of St Vincent. B.W.I.J. Geol. 67, 540–62.Google Scholar
Khudoley, K. M. & Meyerhoff, A. A. 1971. Palaeogeography and geological history of the Greater Antilles. Mem. geol. Soc. Am. 129, 199 pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. F., Harper, C. T., Kemp, A. W. & Stipp, J. J. 1973. K/Ar retention ages of some Cretaceous rocks from Jamaica. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84, 334–40.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, A. E. & Monroe, W. H. 1966. Geology of the Florida Quadrangle, Puerto Rico. Bull. U.S. geol. Surv. 1221-C, 22 pp.Google Scholar
Perret, F. A. 1937. The eruption of Mt Pelée, 1929–32. Carnegie Inst. Washington Pub. 458, 126 pp.Google Scholar
Riehle, J. R. 1973. Calculated compaction profiles of rhyolitic ash-flow tuffs. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 84, 2193–216.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. 1969. Stratigraphy and age of the Dump limestone lenticle, Central Jamaica. Eclogae Geol. Helvetiae 62, 737–44.Google Scholar
Robinson, E. & Lewis, J. F. 1971. Field Guide to aspects of the geology of Jamaica. In I.F.I. guide book to the Caribbean Island Arc system. Spec. Publ. Amer. Geol. Inst. 49 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, C. S. & Smith, R. L. 1961. Ash-flow tuffs: their origin, geologic relations and identification. Prof Paper U.S. geol. Surv. 366, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Sigurdsson, H. 1972. Partly—welded pyroclast flow deposits in Dominica, Lesser Antilles. Trans. 6th Carib. Geol. Conf. Venezuela, held 1971, pp. 307312.Google Scholar
Smith, R. L. 1960. Zones and zonal variations in welded ash flows. Prof. Paper U.S. geol. Surv. 354-F, 149–59.Google Scholar
Weyl, R. 1966. Geologie der Antillen. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin-Nikolassee. 410 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, G. P. L. 1972. Crystal concentration in ignimbrites. Contr. Mineral. Petrol. 36, 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zans, V. A., Chubb, L. J., Versey, H. R., Williams, J. B., Robinson, E. & Cooke, D. L. 1962. Synopsis of the geology of Jamaica. Bull. geol. Surv. Dept. Jamaica No. 4, 72 p.Google Scholar