Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:55:33.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polyphase low-grade metamorphism of the Ingleton Group, northern England, UK: a case study of metamorphic inversion in a mudrock succession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

S. J. KEMP  and
R. J. MERRIMAN
S. J. KEMP*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Sir Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
R. J. MERRIMAN
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Sir Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A series of boreholes in Horton Quarry, northwest Yorkshire (Horton-in-Ribblesdale Inlier) penetrated mudstones and slates belonging to the Austwick Formation (Windermere Supergroup) overlying laminated mudstones of the Ingleton Group. Illite (IC) and chlorite (ChC) crystallinity measurements indicate a metamorphic inversion between the two groups of mudrocks. The Windermere Supergroup mudrocks are mostly in the high anchizone or epizone, whereas the Ingletonian samples are lower grade in terms of IC, and are mostly deep diagenetic zone or low anchizone. Hence younger strata at higher grades rest on older strata at lower grades, creating a metamorphic inversion. Ingletonian slates exposed at Pecca Falls on the River Twiss show epizonal and anchizonal IC values, and greywacke samples from Ingleton Quarry contain pumpellyite. This suggests that grade in the Ingletonian may increase to the NW from the Horton to Ingleton inliers. K-white mica b cell dimensions show further differences between the Ingleton Group and the Windermere Supergroup. The Ingletonian samples are characterized by low b cell values (8.989–9.035, mean 9.007 Å), whereas the Windermere Supergroup has higher values in the range 9.022–9.034, mean 9.027 Å. The Windermere Supergroup values are similar to those recorded from the Windermere Supergroup of the southern Lake District, and Lower Palaeozoic rocks from the Scottish Southern Uplands, and are consistent with metamorphism in a low heat flow, convergent geotectonic setting. The Ingletonian b cell values suggest metamorphism in a higher heat flow setting, most likely an extensional basin. The metamorphic inversion at Horton and differences in K-white mica b cell dimensions suggest that the Ingleton Group and Windermere Supergroup strata evolved in different geotectonic settings and record two separate metamorphic events. The discovery of the metamorphic inversion at Horton provides further evidence in favour of an Ordovician rather than Neoproterozoic depositional age for the controversial Ingleton Group.

Keywords

Ingleton GroupWindermere Supergrouplow-grade metamorphismclay mineralsillite crystallinitymetamorphic inversion
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 146 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 237 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abad, I., Gutiérrez-Alonso, G., Nieto, F., Gertner, I., Becker, A. & Cabero, A. 2003. The structure and the phyllosilicates (chemistry, crystallinity and texture) of Talas Ala-Tau (Tien Shan, Kyrgyz republic): comparison with more recent subduction complexes. Tectonophysics 365, 103–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthurton, R. S., Johnson, E. W. & Mundy, D. C. 1988. Geology of the Country around Settle. Memoir of the British Geological Survey, 1:50,000 Geological Sheet no. 60 (England and Wales). London: HMSO, 156 pp.Google Scholar
Árkai, P. 1991. Chlorite crystallinity: an empirical approach and correlation with illite crystallinity, coal rank and mineral facies as exemplified by Palaeozoic and Mesozoic rocks of northeast Hungary. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 9, 723–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. W. 1987. X-ray diffraction identification of the polytypes of mica, serpentine, and chlorite. Clays and Clay Minerals 36, 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berridge, N. G. 1982. Petrography of the Pre-Carboniferous rocks of the Beckermonds Scar borehole in the context of the magnetic anomaly at the site. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 44, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevins, R. E. & Merriman, R. J. 1988. Co-existing prehnite–actinolite and prehnite–pumpellyite facies assemblages in the Tal y Fan Metabasite Intrusion, North Wales: Implications for Caledonian metamorphism. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 6, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrell, S. H., Greenwood, P. B., Yardley, B. W. D., Shepherd, T. J. & Spiro, B. 1990. Metamorphic and post-metamorphic fluid flow in the low-grade rocks of the Harlech Dome, north Wales. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 8, 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. H., Fortey, N. J., Hughes, R. A., Molyneux, S. G., Moore, R. M., Rushton, A. W. A., Stone, P., Allen, P. M., Cooper, D. C., Evans, J. A., Hirons, S. R. & Webb, B. C. 2004. The Skiddaw Group of the English Lake District. Memoir of the British Geological Survey. Keyworth, Nottingham: British Geological Survey, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, M., Livi, K. J. T., Veblen, D. R. & Frey, M. 1996. White K-mica evolution from phengite to muscovite in shales and shale matrix melange. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 123 (4), 390–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G., Gledhill, A. & Hawkesworth, C. 1985. Upper crustal recycling in southern Britain: evidence from Nd and Sr isotopes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 75, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, M. H. & Robinson, D. 2006. A mid-Ordovician Rb–Sr isochron age from the Ingleton Group, North Yorkshire: metamorphism or diagenesis? Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 56, 81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grathoff, G. H. & Moore, D. M. 1996. Illite polytype quantification using Wildfire calculated X-ray diffraction patterns. Clays and Clay Minerals 44, 835–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidotti, C. V. & Sassi, F. P. 1986. Classification and correlation of metamorphic facies series by means of muscovite b data from low-grade metapelites. Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen 153, 363–80.Google Scholar
Guidotti, C. V., Sassi, F. P. & Blencoe, J. G. 1989. Compositional controls on the a and b cell dimensions of 2M 1 muscovite. European Journal of Mineralogy 1, 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirons, S. R. & Roberts, B. 1999. Metamorphic survey of 1:50000 Kendal and Kirby Lonsdale geological sheets 39 and 49. British Geological Survey Technical Report WA/99/51.Google Scholar
Hower, J., Eslinger, E. V., Hower, M. E. & Perry, E. A. 1976. Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments: Mineralogical and chemical evidence. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, 725–37.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. W., Soper, N. J. & Burgess, I. C. 2001. Geology of the country around Ulverston. Memoir for 1:50,000 Geological Sheet 48 (England & Wales). London: The Stationery Office, for the British Geological Survey, 129 pp.Google Scholar
Kisch, H. J. 1991. Illite crystallinity: recommendations on sample preparation, X-ray diffraction settings and interlaboratory standards. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 9, 665–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneller, B. C., King, L. M. & Bell, A. M. 1993. Foreland basin development and tectonics on the northwest margin of eastern Avalonia. Geological Magazine 130, 691–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneller, B. C., Scott, R. W., Soper, N. J., Johnson, E. W. & Allen, P. M. 1994. Lithostratigraphy of the Windermere Supergroup in northern England. Geological Journal 29, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leedal, G. P. & Walker, G. P. 1950. A restudy of the Ingletonian Series of Yorkshire. Geological Magazine 87, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, R. J. 2002. Contrasting clay mineral assemblages in British Lower Palaeozoic slate belts: the influence of geotectonic setting. Clay Minerals 37, 207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, R. J. & Kemp, S. J. 1996. Clay minerals and sedimentary basin maturity. Mineralogical Society Bulletin 111, 7–8.Google Scholar
Merriman, R. J. & Frey, M. 1999. Patterns of very low-grade metamorphism in metapelitic rocks. In Low-Grade Metamorphism (eds Frey, M. & Robinson, D.), pp. 61–107. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.Google Scholar
Merriman, R. J. & Peacor, D. R. 1999. Very low–grade metapelites: mineralogy, microfabrics and measuring reaction progress. In Low–grade Metamorphism (eds Frey, M. & Robinson, D.), pp. 10–60. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.Google Scholar
Merriman, R. J. & Roberts, B. 1985. A survey of white mica crystallinity and polytypes in mudrocks of Snowdonia and Llŷn, N. Wales. Mineralogical Magazine 49, 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriman, R. J., Rex, D. C., Soper, N. J. & Peacor, D. R. 1995. The age of Acadian cleavage in northern England, UK: K–Ar and TEM analysis of a Silurian metabentonite. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 50, 255–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. M. & Reynolds, R. C. 1997. X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 378 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, P. H., Rex, D. C. & Condliffe, E. 1984. A note on the age and petrogenesis of lamprophyre dykes of the Cautley area, Yorkshire Dales National Park. Transactions of the Leeds Geological Association 10 (4), 40–5.Google Scholar
Noble, S. R., Tucker, R. D. & Pharaoh, T. C. 1993. Lower Palaeozoic and Precambrian igneous rocks from eastern England and their bearing on Ordovician closure of the Tornquist Sea: constraints from U–Pb and Nd isotopes. Geological Magazine 130, 835–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offler, R., McKnight, S. & Morand, V. 1998. Tectonothermal history of the western Lachlan Fold Belt, Australia: insights from white micas. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 16, 531–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Nions, R. K., Oxburgh, E. R., Hawkesworth, C. J. & Macintyre, R. M. 1973. New isotopic and stratigraphical evidence on the age of the Ingletonian. Journal of the Geological Society, London 129, 445–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Nions, R. K., Hamilton, P. J. & Hooker, P. J. 1983. A Nd isotope investigation of sediments related to crustal development in the British Isles. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 63, 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padan, A., Kisch, H. J. & Shagam, R. 1982. Use of the lattice parameter b0 of dioctahedral illite/muscovite, for the characterisation of P/T gradients of incipient metamorphism. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 79, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacor, D. R. 1992. Diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism of shales and slates. In Minerals and Reactions at the Atomic Scale: Transmission Electron Microscopy (ed. Buseck, P. R.), pp. 335–80. Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy no. 27.Google Scholar
Playfair, J. 1802. Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth. Reprinted 1964. New York: Dover Publications, 528 pp.Google Scholar
Schiffman, P. & Day, H. W. 1999. Petrological methods for the study of very low-grade metabasites. In Low-Grade Metamorphism (eds Frey, M. & Robinson, D.), pp. 108–42. Oxford: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.Google Scholar
Soper, N. J. & Woodcock, N. H. 2003. The lost Old Red Sandstone of England and Wales: a record of post Iapetan flexure of Early Devonian transtension? Geological Magazine 140, 627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, N. J. & Dunning, F. W. 2005. Structure and sequence of the Ingleton Group, basement to central Pennines of northern England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 55, 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Środoń, J. 1999. Nature of mixed-layer clays and mechanisms of their formation and alteration. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 27, 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. & Merriman, R. J. 2004. Basin thermal history favours an accretionary origin for the Southern Uplands terrane, Scottish Caledonides. Journal of the Geological Society, London 161, 829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P., Cooper, A. H. & Evans, J. A. 1999. The Skiddaw Group (English Lake District) reviewed: early Palaeozoic sedimentation and tectonism at the northern margin of Avalonia. In In sight of the suture: the geology of the Isle of Man in its Iapetus Ocean context (eds Woodcock, N. H., Fitches, W. R., Quirk, D. G. & Barnes, R. P.), pp. 325–36. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 160.Google Scholar
Underwood, M. B., Laughland, M. M. & Kang, S. M. 1993. A comparison among organic and inorganic indicators of diagenesis and low-temperature metamorphism, Tertiary Shimanto Belt, Shikoku, Japan. In Thermal evolution of the Tertiary Shimanto Belt, Southwest Japan: An example of ridge-trench interaction (ed. Underwood, M. B.), pp. 45–61. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 273.Google Scholar
Warr, L. & Rice, A. H. N. 1994. Interlaboratory standardization and calibration of clay mineral crystallinity and crystallite size data. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 12, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, I. A. 2005. Field Meeting in Lower Kingsdale and Chapel-le-Dale, Ingleton, northwest Yorkshire: Lancashire Group, 9 August 2003. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 116, 143–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. A. & Cornwell, J. D. 1982. The Institute of Geological Sciences borehole at Beckermonds Scar, North Yorkshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 44, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zane, A., Sassi, R. & Guidotti, C. V. 1998. New data on metamorphic chlorite as a petrogenetic indicator mineral, with special regard to greenschist-facies rocks. Canadian Mineralogist 36, 713–26.Google Scholar