Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:50:12.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Panalesis: towards global synthetic palaeogeographies using integration and coupling of manifold models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

CHRISTIAN VÉRARD*
Affiliation:
Chemin de Servasse, F – 74930 Reignier-Ésery, France
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Palaeogeographic reconstructions have been proposed for years. The technique employed, however, is more or less always the same: it consists of determining the palaeoenvironment at the local scale and extending it to the regional scale. Such work is carried out in a maximum number of locations all over the planet and the global palaeogeography is the result of interpolation of those reconstructions. Advances in palaeogeography can be made via an alternative way, which consists of integrating and then coupling various global models. It results in the proposal of synthetic palaeogeographies that can be compared a posteriori to local or regional data. The advantage is twofold: (1) the view is really global and it avoids gaps (in particular in the oceanic realm) in the reconstructions, and it is very much less focused on the coastline; (2) it takes advantages from almost all the fields of geosciences, so that reconstructions can be constrained from a large variety of data. The two techniques – the ‘classic’ and the ‘alternative’ – are not contradictory but complementary, and it is desirable that one feeds the other and the study of palaeogeography be revived.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett-Moore, N., Hassan, R., Müller, R. D., Williams, S. E. & Flament, N. 2017. Dynamic topography and eustasy controlled the paleogeography evolution of northern Africa since the mid Cretaceous. Tectonics 36, 929–44.Google Scholar
Brunetti, M. & Vérard, C. 2017. How to reduce long-term drift in present-day and deep-time simulations? Climate Dynamics, published online 6 September 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00382-017-3883-7.Google Scholar
Brunetti, M., Vérard, C. & Baumgartner, P. O. 2015. Modelling the Middle Jurassic ocean circulation. Journal of Palaeogeography (JoP) 4, 371–83.Google Scholar
Colleoni, F. 2015. GRenoble Ice-Shelf and Land-Ice Model: A Practical User Guide. Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC) Research Papers, RP249, 59 pp.Google Scholar
Davies, R., Goes, S., Davies, J. H., Schubert, B., Bunge, H.-P. & Ritsema, J. 2012. Reconciling dynamic and seismic models of Earth's lower mantle: the dominant role of thermal heterogeneity. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 353–354, 253–69.Google Scholar
Dercourt, J., Guetani, M. & Vrielynck, B. 2000. Atlas Peri-Téthys and Explainating Notes (S. Crasquin coord.). Paris: CCGM, 268 pp., 24 maps.Google Scholar
Dercourt, J., Ricou, L. & Vrielynck, B. (eds) 1993. Atlas Tethys Palaeo-Environmental Maps. Atlas and Explanatory Notes. Paris: Gauthier Villars, 307 pp., 14 maps.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. & Bird, J. 1970. Plate tectonics and geosynclines. Tectonophysics 10, 625–38.Google Scholar
Flament, N. 2014. Linking plate tectonics and mantle flow to Earth's topography. Geology 42, 927–28.Google Scholar
Golonka, J. 2007a. Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies maps: Early Paleozoic. Geologica 35 (4), 589654.Google Scholar
Golonka, J. 2007b. Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies maps: Late Paleozoic. Geologica 33 (2), 145209.Google Scholar
Golonka, J. 2007c. Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies maps: Mesozoic. Geologica 32 (2), 211–64.Google Scholar
Golonka, J. 2009. Phanerozoic paleoenvironment and paleolithofacies maps: Cenozoic. Geologica 35 (4), 507–87.Google Scholar
Gurnis, M., Turner, M., Zahirovic, S., DiCaprio, L., Spasojevic, S., Müller, R. D., Boyden, J., Seton, M., Constantin Manea, V. & Bower, D. 2012. Plate tectonic reconstructions with continuously closing plates. Computers & Geosciences 38, 3542.Google Scholar
Hafkenscheid, E., Wortel, R. & Spakman, W. 2006. Subduction history of the Tethyan region derived from seismic tomography and tectonic reconstructions. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, B08401, doi: 10.1029/2005JB003791, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Hafkenscheid, E., Warners, K., van Oosterhout, C., Bergman, S., van der Burgt, J., Davies, J. H., Govers, R., Hochard, C., Kennan, L., Ross, M., Stampfli, G., Vérard, C., Webb, P. & Wortel, R. 2013. Integrating plate tectonic reconstruction & mantle dynamics: a valuable aid in frontier exploration. Geophysical Research Abstract, EGU General Assembly 15, EGU2013–3204.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. O. 2001. Geophysical applications of vegetation modeling. Ph.D. thesis, Lund University, Lund, 129 pp. Published thesis.Google Scholar
Malatesta, C., Gerya, T., Crispini, L., Federico, L. & Capponi, G. 2013. Oblique subduction modelling indicates along-trench tectonic transport of sediments. Nature Communications 4, 2456, doi: 10.1038/ncomms3456, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Molnar, P. & England, P. 1990. Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and global climate change: chicken or egg? Nature 346, 2934.Google Scholar
Molteni, F. 2003. Atmospheric simulations using a GCM with simplified physical parametrizations. I: model climatology and variability in multidecadal experiments. Climate Dynamics 20, 175–91.Google Scholar
Müller, R. D., Hassan, R., Gurnis, M., Flament, N. & Williams, S. E. 2017. Dynamic topography of passive continental margins and their hinterlands since the Cretaceous. Gondwana Research, published online 1 May 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.028.Google Scholar
Perroud, M., Brunetti, M. & Vérard, C. 2015. Sensitivity of the ocean system to the bathymetry in numerical simulations of climate. Geophysical Research Abstract, EGU General Assembly 17, EGU2015–5336.Google Scholar
Raymo, M. & Ruddiman, W. 1992. Tectonic forcing of late Cenozoic climate. Nature 359, 117–22.Google Scholar
Ritz, C., Rommelaere, V. & Dumas, C. 2001. Modeling the evolution of Antarctic ice sheet over the last 420,000 years: implications for altitude changes in the Vostok region. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, 31943–64.Google Scholar
Royer, D., Berner, R., Montañez, I., Tabor, N. & Beerling, D. 2004. CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today 14 (3), 410.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, W. F. 2001. Earth's Climate: Past and Future. New York: W.H. Freeman & Sons, 465 pp.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. 1976. A continental drift ‘flip book’. Computers & Geosciences 2, 113–16.Google Scholar
Scotese, C., Boucot, A. & McKerrow, W. 1999. Gondwanan palaeogeography and palaeo-climatology. Journal of African Earth Sciences 28, 99114.Google Scholar
Stampfli, G. & Borel, G. 2002. A plate tectonic model for the Paleozoic and Mesozoic constrained by dynamic plate boundaries and restored synthetic oceanic isochrones. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 196, 1733.Google Scholar
Torsvik, T. & Cocks, L. 2017. Earth History and Palaeogeography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 317 pp.Google Scholar
van der Burgt, J., Govers, R., Webb, P., Stampfli, G., Vérard, C., Hochard, C., Davies, J. H. & Wortel, R. 2013. The dynamics of the Eurasian plate and the interplate stress field in the Middle-Late Eocene. Geophysical Research Abstract, EGU General Assembly 15, EGU2013–7946.Google Scholar
Vérard, C. In press. Plate tectonic modelling: review & perspectives. Geological Magazine.Google Scholar
Vérard, C., Hochard, C., Baumgartner, P. & Stampfli, G. 2015a. 3D palaeogeographic reconstructions of the Phanerozoic versus sea-level and Sr-ratio variations. Journal of Palaeogeography 4, 6484.Google Scholar
Vérard, C., Hochard, C., Baumgartner, P. & Stampfli, G. 2015b. Geodynamic evolution of the Earth over the Phanerozoic: plate tectonic activity and palaeo-climatic indicators. Journal of Palaeogeography 4, 167– 88.Google Scholar
Warners-Ruckstuhl, K., Govers, R. & Wortel, R. 2012. Lithosphere-mantle coupling and the dynamics of the Eurasian plate. Geophysical Journal International 189, 1253–76.Google Scholar
Warners-Ruckstuhl, K., Govers, R. & Wortel, R. 2013. Tethyan collision forces and the stress field of the European Plate. Geophysical Journal International 195, 115.Google Scholar
Wilhem, C. 2014. Maps of the Callovian and Tithonian Paleogeography of the Caribbean, Atlantic, and Tethyan Realms: Facies and Environments. Geological Society of America Digital Map and Chart Series 17, sheet 2 (Tithonian paleogeography), doi: 10.1130/2014.DMCH017.S2.Google Scholar
Willett, S. 1999. Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts. Journal of Geophysical Research 104, 28957–81.Google Scholar
Willett, S., Hovius, N., Brandon, M. & Fisher, D. (eds) 2006. Tectonics, Climate, and Landscape Evolution. Geological Society of America, Special Paper no. 398.Google Scholar
Winton, M. 2000. A reformulated three-layer sea ice model. Journal of Atmospheric and Ocean Technology 17, 525–31.Google Scholar