Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:20:39.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Oslobreen Series, Upper Hecla Hoek of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

D. J. Gobbett
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
C. B. Wilson
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.

Abstract

Six formations, totalling 1,210 metres and grouped as the Oslobreen Series, are dominantly of dolomite and limestone often with evidence of discontinuous deposition. They contain a Lower Cambrian and a Canadian fauna. The succession is similar to those of this age in N.W. Scotland, where a revised thickness is given, and in E. Greenland. A new species of Canadian trilobite (Hystricurus) is described in the Appendix.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

VI. REFERENCES

Birkenmajer, K., 1958. Preliminary Report on the Stratigraphy of the Hecla Hoek Formation in Wedel-Jarlsberg Land, Vestspitsbergen. Bull. Acad. Sci. Polonaise. Ser. sci. chim. geol. geogr., vi, 143150.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, K., 1959. Report on the geological investigations of the Hornsund area, Vestspitsbergen, in 1958. 1. The Hecla Hoek Formation. Bull. Acad. Sci. Polonaise. Ser. sci. chim. geol. geogr., vii, 129136.Google Scholar
Cowie, J. W. and Adams, P. J., 1957. The geology of the Cambro-Ordovician rocks of central East Greenland. Medd. Grønland, cliii, 1193.Google Scholar
Hallam, A., 1958. A Cambro-Ordovician fauna from the Hecla Hoek succession of Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geol. Mag., xcv, 71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B., 1959. The Caledonian sequence in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Quart. J. geol. Soc. Lond., cxiv, 307342.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., (MS). The Development of Hecla Hoek Rocks in Spitsbergen. Table I. (Submitted to the I.G.C. Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., (MS). An outline structural history of Spitsbergen. Plate 3. (Submitted to the First International Symposium on Arctic Geology, Calgary 1960.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harland, W. B. and Wilson, C. B., 1956. The Hecla Hoek succession in Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geol. Mag., xciii, 265286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtedahl, O., 1920. On the Palaeozoic Series of Bear Island, especially on the Heclahook System. Norsk. geol. Tidsskr., v, 121148.Google Scholar
Horn, G. and Orvin, A. K., 1928. Geology of Bear Island. Skr. Svalb. og Ishavet, xv.Google Scholar
Horne, J. and Peach, B. N. et al. , 1907. The geological structure of the North-West Highlands of Scotland. Mem. geol. Surv. U.K. London.Google Scholar
Kulling, O., 1934. The “Hecla Hoek Formation” round Hinlopenstredet. Sci. Res. Swed.–Norweg. arct. Exped. 1931, xi, 161254.Google Scholar
Major, H. and Winsnes, T. S., 1955. Cambrian and Ordovician fossils from Sørkapp Land, Spitsbergen. Skr. norsk. Polarinst, cvi.Google Scholar
Phemister, J., 1948. Scotland: The Northern Highlands. 2nd Ed. Brit. reg. Geol. London.Google Scholar
Poulsen, C., 1951. The Position of the East Greenland Cambro-Ordovician in the Palaeogeography of the North-Atlantic Region. Medd. Dansk. geol. Foren., xii, 161–2.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J., 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in north-eastern Utah and its trilobite faunas. Bull. Peabody Mus., vi.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H., 1931. Diplocraterion, Monocraterion, and Scolithus from the Lower Cambrian of Sweden. Sverig. geol. Unders. Afh., xxv, 125.Google Scholar