Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:46:13.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogeny of the Furongian (late Cambrian) remopleuridioid trilobite Haniwa quadrata Kobayashi, 1933 from Korea: implications for trilobite taxonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2010

TAE-YOON PARK  and
DUCK K. CHOI
TAE-YOON PARK
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea
DUCK K. CHOI*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea
*
*Author for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The monophyly of the trilobite Order Asaphida has been challenged. The Superfamily Remopleuridioidea was included in the Order Asaphida, based on the ventral median suture and highly bulbous protaspis of the late Furongian–Tremadocian representatives of the group. The remopleuridioid, Haniwa quadrata Kobayashi, 1933 from the Furongian (late Cambrian) Hwajeol Formation of Korea, represents a primitive morphology of the Remopleuridioidea. This trilobite does not have a typical globular morphology of asaphoid protaspis, and the free cheeks remained yoked together during the whole of the development. This supports the previous proposition that the Superfamily Remopleuridioidea should be excluded from the Order Asaphida. In addition, the evolution of a highly globular protaspis of the Ordovician remopleuridioid trilobites from the less bulbous protaspis corroborates the possibility of multiple evolutions of a highly globular protaspis. It can be argued that the possession of a highly globular protaspis does not guarantee the membership of the Order Asaphida, and thus the concept of the Order Asaphida should be emended.

Keywords

trilobiteCambrianontogenyphylogenyRemopleuridioideaAsaphida
Type
Original Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 148 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 288 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M., Peters, S. E. & Westrop, S. R. 2009. The Marjuman trilobite Cedarina Lochman: thoracic morphology, systematics, and new species from western Utah and eastern Nevada, USA. Zootaxa 2218, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berard, P., Clarkson, E. N. K. & Taylor, C. M. 2000. The ontogeny of Taihungshania miqueli (Bergeron, 1983) from the Arenig of the Montagne Noire, southern France. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 90, 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, J. 1893. Notes paleontologiques. I. Crustacés. Bulletin de la société géologique de la France 21, 333–46.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. 1980. Ontogenetic studies of Middle Ordovician trilobites from the Esbataottine Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Canada. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 171, 1–74.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. & Speyer, S. E. 1997. Ontogeny. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita 1, Revised (ed. Kaesler, R. L.), pp. 173–247. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Speyer, S. E., Hunt, A. S. & Fortey, R. A. 1994. Ontogeny and relationships of Trinucleoidea (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology 68, 523–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.-Y., Qian, Y.-Y., Lin, Y.-K., Zhang, J.-M., Wang, Z.-H., Yin, L.-M. & Erdtmann, B.-D. 1985. Study on Cambrian–Ordovician boundary strata and its biota in Dayangcha, Hunjiang, Jilin, China. Beijing: Prospect Publishing House, 138 pp.Google Scholar
Choi, D. K., Chough, S. K., Kwon, Y. K., Lee, S.-B., Woo, J., Kang, I., Lee, H. S., Lee, S. M., Sohn, J. W., Shinn, Y. J. & Lee, D.-J. 2004. Taebaek Group (Cambrian–Ordovician) in the Seokgaejae section, Taebaeksan Basin: a refined lower Paleozoic stratigraphy in Korea. Geosciences Journal 8, 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, R. & Resser, C. E. 1937. The Sinian and Cambrian formations and fossils of southern Manchoukuo. Manchurian Science Museum Bulletin 1, 1–474.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology 33, 529–76.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. & Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Classification of the trilobite suborder Asaphina. Palaeontology 31, 165–222.Google Scholar
Guo, H.-J. & Duan, J.-Y. 1978. Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from northeastern Hebei and western Liaoning. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 17, 445–58.Google Scholar
Hopkins, M. J. & Webster, M. 2009. Ontogeny and geographic variation of a new species of the corynexochine trilobite Zacanthopsis (Dyeran, Cambrian). Journal of Paleontology 83, 524–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, N. C., Minelli, A. & Fusco, G. 2006. The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: a comparative approach. Paleobiology 32, 602–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A. & Adrain, J. M. 2003. Available generic names for trilobites. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 48, 331–551.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1933. Upper Cambrian of the Wuhutsui basin, Liaotung, with special reference to the limit of Chaumitien (or Upper Cambrian) of eastern Asia and its subdivision. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 11, 55–155.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen. Palaeontology. Pt. III, Cambrian faunas of South Chosen, with a special study on the Cambrian genera and families. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Section II 4 (2), 49–344.Google Scholar
Kwon, Y. K., Chough, S. K., Choi, D. K. & Lee, D.-J. 2006. Sequence stratigraphy of the Taebaek Group (Cambrian–Ordovician), mideast Korea. Sedimentary Geology 192, 19–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Y. & Choi, D. K. 2009. Post-embryonic development of the Furongian (late Cambrian) trilobite Tsinania canens: implications for life mode and phylogeny. Evolution & Development 11, 441–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, T.-Y. & Choi, D. K. 2010 a. Ontogeny and ventral median suture of the ptychaspidid trilobite Asioptychaspis subglobosa (Sun, 1924) from the Furongian (Upper Cambrian) Hwajeol Formation, Korea. Journal of Paleontology 84, 309–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Y. & Choi, D. K. 2010 b. Two middle Cambrian diceratocephalid trilobites, Cyclolorenzella convexa and Diceratocephalus cornutus, from Korea: development and functional morphology. Lethaia 43, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, Y. 1994. Trilobites from the middle Upper Cambrian (Changshan Stage) of north and northeast China. Palaeontologica Sinica, new series B 30, 1–176 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Qiu, H.-A., Lu, Y.-H., Zhu, Z.-L., Bi, D.-C., Lin, T.-R., Zhang, Q.-Z., Qian, Y.-Y., Ju, T.-Y., Han, N.-R. & Wei, X.-Z. 1983. Trilobita. In Palaeontological Atlas of East China, 1; Volume of Early Palaeozoic (ed. Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources), pp. 28–254. Beijing: Geological Publishing House (Chinese).Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 37, 389–466.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. 1951. The ontogenies of three Garden City (Early Ordovician) trilobites. Journal of Paleontology 25, 578–86.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. B. 1957. Qualitative trilobite studies II, measurement of the dorsal shield of non-agnostidean trilobites. Journal of Paleontology 313, 193–207.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1975. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobites from the Burke River structural belt, western Queensland. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, Bulletin 153, 1–251.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. G., Hughes, N. C., Kopaska-Merkel, D. C. & Ludvigsen, R. 2005. Development of the caudal exoskeleton of the pliomerid trilobite Hintzeia plicamarginis new species. Evolution & Development 7, 528–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohn, J. W. & Choi, D. K. 2007. Furongian trilobites from the Asioptychaspis and Quadraticephalus zones of the Hwajeol Formation, Taebaeksan Basin, Korea. Geosciences Journal 11, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y. C. 1924. Contributions to the Cambrian faunas of North China. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B 1, 1–109.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. C. 1935. The Upper Cambrian trilobite faunas of north China. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B 7, 1–93.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1905. Cambrian faunas of China. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 29, 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, M. 2007. Ontogeny and evolution of the early Cambrian trilobite genus Nephrolenellus (Olenelloidea). Journal of Paleontology 81, 1168–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1959. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites; Remopleurididae, Trinucleidae, Raphiophoridae, Endymioniidae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University 121, 371–496.Google Scholar
Yao, L.-C. & Wang, X.-P. 1978. On the geological age of “Sansangtze Limestone” fauna from the northern regions of Anhui and Kiangsu. Acta Scientarium Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis 4, 111–29 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhu, Z.-L. & Wei, R.-Y. 1991. On taxonomic position of Haniwa Kobayashi (Trilobita). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 30, 413–19 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar