No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
As is well known, there is a great diversity of opinion with regard to the relationship of the implement-bearing beds of the Pleistocene formations and the Chalky Boulder Clay. Any facts which throw light on this vexed question might, I thought, be very acceptable and useful and I am endeavouring in this paper to bring forward what evidence I can bearing on this very difficult and perplexing subject.
page 265 note 1 Bemrose, H. H. Arnold and Deeley, R. M., Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc., lii, 1896, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 265 note 2 Dalton, W. H., Trans. and Proc. Essex Field Club, ii, 1881, 15, and Essex Nat., iv, 1890. 104.Google Scholar
page 265 note 3 Essex Nat., xiii, 1904, 249.Google Scholar
page 265 note 4 French, J., Essex Nat., vi, 1892, 132.Google Scholar
page 266 note 1 Essex Nat., viii, 1894, 155, 219Google Scholar. Newton, E. T., Essex Nat., ix, 1895, 16.Google Scholar Holmes, T. V., Essex Nat., ix, 1895, 10.Google Scholar
page 266 note 2 Kenworthy, J. W., Essex Nat., xi, 1899, 96Google Scholar; and Holmes, S. V., Essex Nat., ix, 1895, 19.Google Scholar