Article contents
On Senonian Ammonoidea from Jamaica
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
In his paper on “The Yellow Limestone of Jamaica and its Mollusca” (Geological Magazine, Vol. LX, 1923, p. 345) Dr. C. T. Trechmann referred to an Upper Senonian fauna from shales at Providence, near Port Antonio, underlying a limestone with Rudistae. He recorded Baculites from the upper portion of these shales, and “rather low in the sequence” he collected some ammonites, one of which had been identified by the writer as belonging to the genus Parapachydiscus. The Shales at Providence had already been mentioned by the late Mr. Lucas Barrett1 as containing Baculites and Hamites, and in his collection, now in the British Museum (Natural History), there are preserved a number of fossils including the Pholadomya and Trigonia he recorded and two fragments of Hamites. The matrix of these is the same as that of Dr. Trechmann's examples, namely a brown calcareous sandstone, and the ‘Hamites’ in both collections belong to the same species, but Mr. Lucas Barrett's Baculites I have not been able to trace.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1925
References
page 28 note 1 In Sawkins, , “Report on the Geologv of Jamaica”: Mem. Geol. Surv., 1869, p. 78.Google Scholar
page 28 note 2 “Cretaceous Cephalopoda from Zululand”: Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol. xii, pt. vii, No. 16, 1921, pp. 217–73.Google Scholar
page 28 note 3 “Upper Cretaceous Ammonoidea from Pondoland”: Ann. Durban Mus., vol. iii, pt. ii, 1921, pp. 39–56. ‘Senonian Ammonite Fauna of Pondoland’: Trans. Hoy. Soc. S. Afr., vol. x, pt. iii, 1922, pp. 113–47.Google Scholar
page 28 note 4 “Contributions to the Palæontology of Assam”: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Pal. Indica, N.S., vol. viii, No. 1, 1923, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
page 28 note 5 “Kreidebildungen und ihre Fauna am Stallauer Bck und Enzenauer Kopf bei Tölz”: Palaeontographica, vol. xlviii, 1901, pp. 53–7.Google Scholar
page 28 note 6 See Hawkins, , “Some Cretaceous Echinoidea from Jamaica”: Geol. Mag., Vol. LX, 1923, p. 215.Google Scholar
page 29 note 1 Genotype: Tetragonites epiqonus Kossmat: “Untersuchungen über die Südindische Kreideformation”: Beitr. Pal. Geol. Österr.-Ung., vol. ix, 1895, p. 135, pl. xvii, figs, 4a–c.Google Scholar
page 29 note 2 See Spath, , “Ammonoidea of the Gault”: Mon. Pal. Soc., (1921), 1923, text-fig. 6, p. 26.Google Scholar
page 29 note 3 Loc. cit., 1923, p. 51, pi. iv, figs. 6a, b.Google Scholar
page 29 note 4 “Les Ammonites de la Craie Supérieure”: Mém. Explic. Carte Géol. Dél. France, Rech. Craie Supér., ii, 1893, p. 207.Google Scholar
page 30 note 1 “Cephalopoden der Oberen Deutschen Kreide”: Palaeontographica, vol. xxi, 1872, p. 56, pl. xvii, figs. 4–5.Google Scholar
page 30 note 2 Loc. cit., 1923, p. 56, pl. iv, figs. 5a–d.Google Scholar
page 30 note 3 ‘Untersuehungen über die Cephalopoden der Oberen Kreide in Polen. III’: Bull. Acad. Sci. Cracovie, Cl. Sci. Math, et Nat. B., 1913, pp. 353–62, pls. xl, xli.Google Scholar
page 30 note 4 “Contribution à l'étude des Céphalopodes du Crétacé Supérieur de France”: Mém. Soc. Géol. France, Pal., vol. ii, 1891, p. 10, pl. v, fig. 2.Google Scholar
page 30 note 5 Traité de Géologie, vol. ii, fase. 2, 1907, p. 1170.Google Scholar
page 30 note 6 Loc. cit., 1891, pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
page 30 note 7 Spath, loc. cit. (Zululand, 1921), p. 256.Google Scholar
page 31 note 1 Pal. Franç., Ter. Crét., i, 1841, p. 551, pl. cxxxvi, figs. 1–4.Google Scholar
page 31 note 2 Loc. cit., 1895, p. 146, pl. xix, figs. 7a, b (B.M. No. R 10500, Geol. Soc. Coll.)Google Scholar
page 31 note 3 Loc. cit., 1921, p. 256.Google Scholar
page 31 note 4 “Cretaceous Fauna of Pondoland”: Ann. S. Afr. Mus., vol. iv, pt. vii, No. 12, 1908, p. 339, pl. xliii, figs. 2a, b.Google Scholar
page 31 note 5 Loc. cit (Palaeontographica, 1872), p. 97, pl. xxx, figs. 5–7 (lectotype), described as Ancyloceras retrorsum.Google Scholar
page 31 note 6 “Mollusken der Aachener Kreide”: Palaeontographica, vol. xxxv, 1889, pl. v, fig. 5.Google Scholar
page 31 note 7 Loc. cit., 1872, p. 102, pl. xxxi, figs. 6–9.Google Scholar
- 28
- Cited by