Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:42:21.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Species of Temnocheilus McCoy from Holy Island, Northumberland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Margery I. Platt
Margery I. Platt
Affiliation:
Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Although British and American forms of this genus all bear points of resemblance to Temnocheilus ventro-concavus, only two small specimens from Eastern Europe, Nautilus dorso-armatus Abich, resemble it in their possession of a flattened concave venter and a whorl section of quasi-quadrilateral shape.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 75 , Issue 10 , October 1938 , pp. 454 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abich, H., 1875. Geologische Forschungen in den Kaükasischen Ländern, Wein. Theil. 1, S. 20, Tab. 4, ff. 1, la.Google Scholar
Carruthers, R. G., and others. “The Geology of Belford, Holy Is., and the Farne Islands,” Mem. Geol. Survey, 107–109.Google Scholar
Foord, A. H., 1891. British Museum Catalogue of Fossil Cephalopoda, London, pt. II, 142–159.Google Scholar
Foord, A. H., and Crick, G. C., 1894. “On Temnocheilus coronatus McCoy, from the Carboniferous Limestone of Stebden Hill, near Cracoe, Yorkshire,” Geol. Mag., XXXI, 295–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foord, A. H., 1897–1903. “Carboniferous Cephalopoda of Ireland,” Monograph Palaeontographical Society, London, p. 49.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. G. De, 1878. Annales du Mus. Roy. d' Hist. Nat. de Belgique, Tome II, Pt. 1, p. 115, pl. xxiv, ff. 2a, b.Google Scholar
McCoy, F., 1862. Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland, London, 20–22, pl. iv, f. 15.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B., and Worthen, A. H., 1870. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, p. 49.Google Scholar
Miller, A. K., and Owen, J. B., 1934. University of Iowa Studies, xvi, no. 3, 221–5.Google Scholar
Savage, T. E., 1924. Journal of Geology, xxxii, 580.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, A., and McCoy, F., 1854. British Palaeozoic Rocks and Fossils, Cambridge, p. 562, fig. 15, pl. 3H.Google Scholar
Smith, S., 1910. Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. Northumberland, Durham, and Newcastle-on-Tyne, New Series, iii, 614.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J., 1821. The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, London, iii, 90.Google Scholar
Tzwetaev, Marie, 1888. “Céphalopodes de la Section Supérieure du caleaire carbonifére de la Russie Centrale,” Mem. du Comité Géol., St. Petersburg, vol. v, pp. 9 and 45.Google Scholar