Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:10:36.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mid-Turonian ammonite faunas from northern Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. J. Kennedy  and
W. A. Cobban
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turonian ammonite assemblages are described from six localities in the Ojinaga and Boquillas formations of Chihuahua in northern Mexico. These assemblages reveal the presence of the middle Turonian zones of Collignoniceras woollgari and Prionocyclus hyatti far to the south of previously documented occurrences. The Mexican collections include co-occurring collignoniceratids, known from as far north as Montana, and Tethyan euomphaloceratines and coilopoceratids. One species, Puzosia (Puzosia) serratocarinata, is new.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 125 , Issue 6 , November 1988 , pp. 593 - 612
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, W. S. 1928. Handbook of Texas Cretaceous fossils. University of Texas Bulletin 2838, 385 pp., 37 pls.Google Scholar
Adkins, W. S. 1931. Some Upper Cretaceous ammonites in western Texas. University of Texas Bulletin 3101, 35–72, pls. 2–5.Google Scholar
Amédro, F. & Badillet, G. 1982. Ammonites du Saumurois In Robaszynski, Francis, and others, Le Turonien de la région-type, Saumurois et Touraine. Stratigraphie, biozonations, sédimentologie. Bulletin des Centres de Recherches Exploration-Production Elf-Aquitaine 6 (1), 130–8, pls. 2–6.Google Scholar
Bayle, E. 1878. Fossils principaux des terrains. Explication de la Carte Géologique de France 4 (1), (Atlas), 158 pls.Google Scholar
Breistroffer, M. 1947. Notes de nomenclature paléo-zoologique. Procés-Verbaux Mensuelles de la Société Scientifique de Dauphiné 26 (195), 5 pp. (unpaged).Google Scholar
Chancellor, G. R. 1982. Cenomanian-Turonian ammonites from Coahuila, Mexico. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Uppsala n.s. 9, 77–129.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1951. Colorado shale of central and northwestern Montana and equivalent rocks of Black Hills. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 35, (10), 2170–98.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1976. Ammonite record from the Mancos Shale of the Castle Valley-Price-Woodside area, east-central Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies 22 (3), 117–26.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1984. Molluscan record from a mid-Cretaceous borehole in Weston County, Wyoming. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1271, 24 pp., 5 pls.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1986. Upper Cretaceous molluscan record from Lincon County, New Mexico. In Southwest Section of AAPG Transactions and Guidebook of 1986 Convention, Ruidoso, New Mexico, [pp. 77–89.] Socorro: Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. & Hook, S. C. 1979. Collignoniceras woollgari woollgari (Mantell) ammonite fauna from Upper Cretaceous of Western Interior, United States. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources, Memoir 37, 51 pp., 12 pls.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. & Hook, S. C. 1980. The Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) ammonite family Coilopoceratidae Hyatt in the Western Interior of the United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1192, 28 pp., 21 pls.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. & Hook, S. C. 1983. Mid-Cretaceous (Turonian) ammonite fauna from Fence Lake area of west-central New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Memoir 41, 50 pp., 14 pls.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A. & Reeside, J. B. Jr. 1952. Correlation of the Cretaceous formations of the Western Interior of the United States. Geological Society of America Bulletin 63(10), 1011–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collignon, M. 1965. Atlas des fossils caractéristiques de Madagascar (Ammonites), XII (Turonien). iv + 82 pp., pls. 376–413. Tananarive: Service Géologique.Google Scholar
Collignon, M. 1967. Les Céphalopodes crétacés du bassin côtier de Tarfaya. Notes et Mémoires. Service Géologique de Maroc 175, 148 pp., 35 pls.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. R. 1978. Uppermost Cenomanian-basal Turonian ammonites from Salinas, Angola. Annals of the South African Museum 75, 51–152.Google Scholar
Courtiller, . 1860. Description de trois nouvelles espèces d'ammonites du terrain crétacé. Mémoires de la Société impériale d'Agriculture Sciences et Arts d'Angers (3) 3, 245–52, pls. 1–3.Google Scholar
Daugherty, F. W. & Powell, J. D. 1963. Late Cretaceous stratigraphy in northern Coahuila, Mexico. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 47, 2059–64.Google Scholar
Diener, C. 1925. Ammonoidea neocretacea [pt. 29] of Animalia [pt. 1] of Fossilium Catalogus (ed. Diener, C.), [244pp.] Berlin: W. JunkGoogle Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1879. (Note accompagnant le présentation de l'Atlas de t. iv de l'explication de la carte góologique de France de E. Bayle & R. Zeiller). Bulletin de la Société Géologique de la France (3) 7, 91–2.Google Scholar
Douvillé, H. 1912. Évolution et classification des Pulchellidés. Bulletin de la Société Gélogique de la France (4) 11, 285–20.Google Scholar
Gill, T. 1871. Arrangement of the families of Mollusks. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 227, xvi+49 pp.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W. & Shimer, H. W. 1910. North American Index Fossils, 2 [909 pp.] New York: A. G. Seiler and Company.Google Scholar
Grossouvre, A. De. 1894. Recherches sur la craie supériéur, 2. Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la craie supérieure. Mémoires de la Carte Gélogique Détaille de la France 264 pp., 39 pls. [1893 imprint].Google Scholar
Haas, O. 1946. Intraspecific variation in, and ontogeny of, Prionotropis woollgari and Prionocyclus wyomingensis. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 86, 141–224, pls. 11–24.Google Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1962. Stratigraphy of the Carlile Shale (Upper Cretaceous) in Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey Bulletin 156, 155 pp., 27 pls.Google Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1965. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy, paleontology and paleoecology of western Kansas. Geological Society of America Field Conference Guidebook 78th Annual Meeting, 1965. 69 pp.Google Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1977. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy, paleontology and paleoecology of western Kansas, with a section on Pierre Shale, by Cobban, W. A.. The Mountain Geologist 14 (3, 4) 175–218.Google Scholar
Hattin, D. E. & Siemers, C. T. 1978. Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy and depositional environments of western Kansas. Kansas Geological Survey, The University of Kansas Guidebook Series 3, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. & Johnson, D. W. 1900a. The geology of the Albuquerque sheet. New Mexico University Bulletin 2, 67 pp., 22 pls.Google Scholar
Herrick, C. L. & Johnson, D. W. 1900b. The geology of the Albuquerque sheet. Denison University Scientific Laboratories Bulletin 2, 175–239, pls. 27–32.Google Scholar
Hook, S. C. & Cobban, W. A. 1982. Spathites puercoensis (Herrick & Johnson) – common Upper Cretaceous guide fossil in Rio Puerco valley, New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources, Annual Report 1980–1981, 36–9.Google Scholar
Hook, S. C. & Cobban, W. A. 1983. Mid-Cretaceous molluscan sequence at Gold Hill, Jeff Davis Country, Texas, with faunal comparison to New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Circular 185, 48–54.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1889. Genesis of the Arietidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 673, xi + 239 pp. 14 pls.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, pp. 502–604. In Textbook of Palaeontology (ed. Von Zittel, K. A., translated by Eastman, C. R.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. Monographs of the United States Geological Survey 44, 351 pp., 47 pls.Google Scholar
Jones, T. S. 1938. Geology of Sierra de la Pena and paleontology of the Indidura Formation, Coahuila, Mexico. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 49, 69–150, pls. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, E. G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important macrofossils, Western Interior basin, U.S.A. The Mountain Geologist 14(3–4), 225–74, 32 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. & Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography and biostratigraphy. Palaeontological Association of London Special Papers in Palaeontology 17, 94 pp., 11 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. & Cobban, W. A. 1988. The Upper cretaceous ammonite Romaniceras Spath, 1923 in New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Bulletin 114, 23–34.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. & Wright, C. W. 1979 a. On Kamerunoceras Reyment, 1954 (Cretaceous: Ammonoidea). Journal of Paleontology 53, 1165–78, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. & Wright, C. W. 1979 b. Vascoceratid ammonites from the type Turonian. Palaeontology 22, 665–83, pls. 82–6.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. Wright, C. W. & Hancock, J. M. 1980 a. Collignoniceratid ammonites from the mid-Turonian of England and northern France. Palaeontology 23, 557–603, pls. 62–77.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Wright, C. W. & Hancock, J. M. 1980 b. Origin, evolution and systematics of the Cretaceous ammonid Spathites. Palaeontology 23, 821–37, pls. 104–6.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Wright, C. W. & Hancock, J. M. 1980 c. The European species of the Cretaceous ammonite Romaniceras with a revision of the genus. Palaeontology 23, 325–62, pls. 39–50.Google Scholar
King, R. E. & Adkins, W. S. 1946. Geology of a part of the Lower Conchos Valley, Chihuahua, Mexico. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 57, 275–94, 4 pls.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenen, A. Von. 1887–1898. Ueber Fossilien der unteren Kreide am Ufer des Mungo in Kamerun. Abhandlungen der Könglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaft zu Göttingen, Mathematischen-Physikalische Klasse n.s. 1897, 1 (1), 1–48 pls. 1–4; 1898, 1 (1), 49–65, pls. 5–7.Google Scholar
Kossmat, F. 1895. Untersuchungen über die Südindischen Kreideformationen, 1. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarens und des Orients 9, 97–203 (1–107), pls. 15–25(1–11).Google Scholar
Kullmann, J. & Wiedmann, J. 1970. Significance of sutures in phylogeny of Ammonoidea. Paleontological Contributions, University of Kansas 47, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Kummel, B. & Decker, J. M. 1954. Lower Turonian ammonites from Texas and Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 28, 310–9, pls. 30–3.Google Scholar
Laube, G. C. & Bruder, G. 1887. Ammoniten der Böhmischen Kreide. Palaeontographica 3, 217–39, pls. 23–9.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de M. de 1799. Prodrome d'une nouvelle classification des coquilles. Mémoires de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris (for 1799), 63–90.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de 1801. Systèm des animaux sans verèbres:Paris,. B. P. A., deLamarck, Chez Deterville, 432 pp.Google Scholar
Logan, W. N. 1898. The invertebrates of the Benton, Niobrara, and Fort Pierre Groups. Kansas University Geological Survey 4 (8), 431–518, pls. 86–120.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1822. The Fossils of the South Downs; or Illustrations of the Geology of Sussex, xvi + 327 pp., 42 pls. London: Lupton Relfe.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1959. Upper Cretaceous ammonites of California. Part II. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology. Special Volume 1, 172 pp., 41 pls.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T., Saito, R. & Fukada, A. 1957. Some acanthoceratids from Hokkaido. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology 16, 1–45, pls. 1–18.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1872. Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of a list of fossils with descriptions of some new types etc. In Preliminary report of the United States Geologic Survey of Wyoming and Portions ofContigous Territories (Being a Second Annual Report of Progress) conducted under the auspices of the Secretary of the Interior by F. V. Hayden, United States Geologist. 511 pp. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876 a. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the Upper Missouri country. In Report of the United States Geological Survey of the Territories (F. V. Hayden) 9, lxiv + 629 pp., 45 pls.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1876 b. Descriptions of the Cretaceous fossils collected on the San Juan exploring expedition under Capt. J. N. Macomb, U.S. Engineers. In Report of the exploring expedition from Santa Fe, New Mexico, to the junction of the Grand and Green Rivers on the Great Colorado of the west, in 1859 under the direction of Capt. J. N. Macomb. U.S. Engineering Department, 119–33, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Merewether, E. A., Cobban, W. A. & Cavanauoh, E. T. 1979. Frontier Formation and equivalent rocks in eastern Wyoming. The Mountain Geologist 16 (3) 67–101, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Morrow, A. L. 1935. Cephalopods from the Upper Cretaceous of Kansas. Journal of Paleontology 9, 463–73, pls. 49–53.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1840–1842. Paléontologie française; Terrains crétacés. 1, Céphalopodes, 1–120 (1840); 121–430 (1841); 431–662 (1842), 151 pls. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Orbigny, A. D'. 1850. Prodrome de Paléontologie Stratigraphique Universelle des Animaux Mollusques et Rayonnés. 2428 pp. Paris: Masson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervinquière, L. 1907. Études de paléontologie tunisienne. 1. Céphalopodes des terrains secondaries. Carte géologique de la Tunisie v + 438 pp., 27 pls. Paris: de Rudeval.Google Scholar
Petrascheck, W. 1903. Ueber Inoceramen aus der Kreide Böhmens und Sachsens. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, Wien 58, 153–68, pl. 8.Google Scholar
Powell, J. D. 1963. Turonian (Cretaceous) ammonites from northwestern Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 37, 1217–32, pls. 166–71.Google Scholar
Powell, J. D. 1965. Late Cretaceous platform-basin facies, northern Mexico and adjacent Texas. Bulletin of American Association of Petroleum Geologists 49, 511–25.Google Scholar
Renz, O. 1982. The Cretaceous Ammonites of Venezuela. 132 pp., 40 pls. Basel: Maraven.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1954. Some new Upper Cretaceous ammonite genera from Nigeria. Colonial Geological Surveys, Mineral Resources Division 4, 248–70, 5 pls.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1955. The Cretaceous Ammonoidea of Nigeria and the southern Cameroons. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Nigeria 25, 112 pp., 25 pls.Google Scholar
Schlotheim, E. F. Von. 1820. Die Petrefaktenkunde auf ihrem jetzigen Standpunkte durch die Beschreibung seiner Sammlung lxii + 437 pp., Gotha.Google Scholar
Solger, F. 1904. Die Fossilien der Mungokreide in Kamerun und ihre geologische Bedeutung, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ammoniten. In Beiträge zur Geologic von Kamerun, vol. 2 (Esch, E., Solger, F., Oppenheim, P. and Jaekel, O.) pp. 85–242, pls. 3–5. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuch-handlung.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1827. The Mineralogy Conchology of Great Britain (continued) 6 pls. 545–80.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1922. On the Senonian ammonite fauna of Pondoland. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 10, 113–47, pls. 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1923. On the amm´onite horizon of the Gault and contiguous deposits. Summary of Progress of the Geological Survey of Great Britain for 1922, 139–49.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1894. The Colorado formation and its invertebrate fauna. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 106, 288 pp., 45 pls. [1893 imprint].Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1863–1866. The fossil cephalopoda of the Cretaceous rocks of southern India. Ammonitidae with revision of the Nautilidae & c. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. (1), Palaeontologica Indica 3, (1), 41–56, pls. 26–31 (1863); (2–5), 57–106, pls. 32–54 (1864); (6–9), 107–54, pls. 55–80 (1865); (10–13), 155–216, pls. 81–94 (1866).Google Scholar
Tokunaga, S. & Shimizu, S. 1926). The Cretaceous formation of Futaba in Iwaki and its fossils. Journal of the Faculty of Science of Tokyo Imperial University Section 21 (6), 181–212, pls. 21–7.Google Scholar
Wedekind, R. 1916. Über Lobus, Suturallobus und Inzision. Zentralblatt für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie (B), 1916 (8), 185–95.Google Scholar
Wiedmann, J. 1966. Stammesgeschichte und System der Posttriadischen Ammonoideen; ein Überblick. Neues Jährbuch f¨r Geologic und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 125, 47–79, pls. 1–2; 127, 13–81, pls. 3–6.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. 1957. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, part L. Mollusca 4, Cephalopoda Ammonoidea (ed. Moore, R. C.) xxii + 490 pp. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. & Kennedy, W. J. 1981. The Ammonoidea of the Plenus Marls and the Middle Chalk. Palaeontographical Society Monographs 148 pp.,32 pls.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. & Kennedy, W. J. 1984. The Ammonoidea of the Lower Chalk, Part 1. Palaeontographical Society Monographs 126 pp., 40 pls.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W. & Wright, E. V. 1951. A Survey of the fossil Cephalopoda of the Chalk of Great Britain. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, 40 pp.Google Scholar
Young, K. & Powell, J. D. 1978. Late Albian-Turonian correlations in Texas and Mexico. In Mid-Cretaceous events, Uppsala-Nice symposium, 1975–1976. Annales du Museum d'Histoire Naturellde Nice 4, xxv.1–xxv.36, 9 pls. [1976 imprint].Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. Von. 1884. Handbuch de Palaontologie, 1 Abt. 2; Lief 3, Cephalopoda, pp. 329–522. Munich & Leipzig: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. Von. 1895. Grundzüge der Palaontologie (Paläozoologie). vii + 972 pp., Munich & Leipzig: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar