Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:35:29.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microplankton from the Cornbrash of Yorkshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

W. A. S. Sarjeant
W. A. S. Sarjeant
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Sheffield.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An assemblage of microplankton from the Cornbrash of Yorkshire is described. It consists dominantly of dinoflagellates, including three new species of Gonyaulax and one new species of Pareodinia. A relatively small number of hystrichospheres are present, including new species of Baltisphaeridium, Cymatiosphaera, and Pterospermopsis. The character and significance of the assemblage are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 96 , Issue 5 , October 1959 , pp. 329 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkell, W. J., 1933. The Jurassic System in Great Britain. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cookson, I. C., and Eisenack, A., 1958. Microplankton from Australian and New Guinea Upper Mesozoic Sediments. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, lxx, 19–79.Google Scholar
Deane, H., 1849. On the Occurrence of Fossil Xanthidia and Polythalamia in the Chalk. Trans. Microsc. Soc. Lond., ii, 77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1935. Considerations biologiques sur les organismes d'origine planctonique conservés dans les silex de la craie. Bull. Biol. Fr. et Belg., xix. 213–244.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1936–1937. Microfossiles des silex crétacés. Ann. Paléont. xxv, 151–191, xxvi, 1–55.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1941. Microplancton kiméridgien ďOrbagnoux. Mém. Acad. Sci., Paris, lxv, 1–32.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1942. Sur les hystrichosphéres de calcaires siluriens de la Montagne Noire. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, ccxv, 475–6.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1947. Sur une nouvelle hystrichosphére des silex crétacés et sur les affinités du genre Cannosphaeropsis., ccxliv, 1574–6.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1947. Sur quelques micro-organismes planctoniques des silex jurassiques. Bull. Inst. Océanogr. de Monaco, No. 921, 1–10.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1954. Systematique des hystrichosphaeridés: sur l'acception du genre Cymatiosphaera O. Wetzel. C. R. Somm. Soc. Géol. Fr., 257–9.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., and Cookson, I. C., 1955. Fossil Microplankton from Australian Late Mesozoic and Tertiary Sediments. Austr. Jour. Mar. Freshw. Res., vi, 242–313.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., and Courteville, H., 1939. Note Préliminaire sur les micro-fossils des silex crétacés de Cambrésis. Bull. Soc. Microsc., viii, 95–106.Google Scholar
Deunff, J., 1954. Micro-organismes planctoniques (hystrichosphéres) dansle Deveonian du Massif Armoricain. C. R. Somm. Soc. Géol. Fr., 239–242.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. A., and Arkell, W. J., 1932. The Stratigraphic Distribution of the Cornbrash; II The North-eastern Area. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxviii, 112–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downie, C., 1957. Microplankton from the Kimmeridge Clay. Quart. Journ. Soc., cxii, 413–434.Google Scholar
Downie, C., 1959. Hystrichospheres from Silurian Wenlock Shales of England. Palaeontology ii, pt. 1 (in press).Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1838. Über das Massenverhältnis der jetzt lebenden Kieselinfusorien in Ungarn. Abhand. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, (1836) f.l 109–135.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1854. Mikrogeologie. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1958. Mikroplankton aus dem norddeutschen Apt nebst einige Bemerkungen über fossile Dinoflagellaten. Neues Jb. Geol. u. Paläont., cvi, 383–422.Google Scholar
Lejeune-Carpentier, M., 1946. L<étude microscopique des silex (12ième Note), Éspèces nouvelles ou douteuses de Gonyaulax. Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg., lxix, B187–197.Google Scholar
Reade, Rev. J. B., 1839. On some new Organic Remains in the Flint of the Chalk. Annals of Natural History, II, 191–8.Google Scholar
Sylvester-Bradley, P. C., 1953. A Stratigraphical Guide to the Fossil Localities of the Scarborough District. The Natural History of the Scarborough District, 1, 19–48.Google Scholar
Valensi, L., 1953. Microfossiles des silex du Jurassique Moyen. Mem. Soc. Géol. Fr., No. 68.Google Scholar
Wetzel, O., 1933. Die in organischer Substanz erhaltenen Mikrofossilien des baltischen Kreide-Feuersteins. Palaeontographica, lxxvii, 141–188 and lxxviii 1–110.Google Scholar
Wetzel, W., 1952. Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Dan-Zeitlichen Meeresplankton. Geol. Jber., lxvi, 391–418 (1950).Google Scholar
White, H. H., 1844. On fossil Xanthidia. Trans. Microscop. Soc. Lond., I, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. J., 1849. Observation of Xanthidium both Recent and Fossil. Trans. Microscop. Soc. Lond., II, 89–92.Google Scholar