Article contents
Mangaia and Rurutu—a Comparison between two Pacific Islands
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Abstract
In an article with the above heading (GEOL. MAG., Vol. LXIV, 1927, p. 518) Mr. L. J. Chubb discussed the geology of these two small Pacific islands, which are somewhat centrally situated in the western part of the South Pacific Ocean.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1929
References
page 385 note 1 Marshall, P., “Geology of Mangaia,” Bishop Mus. Bull., 36, Honolulu, 1927.Google Scholar
page 389 note 1 Andrews, C. W., “Christmas Island,” British Mus. Monograph, 1900, p. 283.Google Scholar
page 389 note 2 Andrews, E. C., “Notes on the Limestones and General Geology of the Fiji Islands,” Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, vol. 38, 1900, p. 18, pl. 1.Google Scholar
page 390 note 1 Reynolds, D. L., “The Petrography of the Triassic Sandstone of North-east Ireland,” Geol. Mag., 1928, pp. 454–5.Google Scholar
page 393 note 1 Bosworth, T. O., “The Keuper Marls around Charnwood,” Leicester Lit. and Phil. Soc., 1911, pp. 82–9.Google Scholar
page 394 note 1 T. O. Bosworth, op. cit., pp. 87, 88.
page 396 note 1 Daly, R. A., “Low-temperature Formation of Alkaline Felspars in Limestones,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., iii, pp. 659–65, 1917.Google Scholar
page 396 note 2 Spencer, E., “Albite and other Authigenic Minerals in Limestone from Bengal,” Min. Mag., vol. xx, pp. 365–80, 1925.Google Scholar
page 396 note 3 R. A. Daly, op. cit.
page 396 note 4 de Lapparent, J., “Cristaux de feldspath et de quartz dans les calcaires du Trias moyen d' Alsace et de Lorraine,” C.R. Aced. Sci., Paris, clxxi, pp. 862–5, 1920.Google Scholar
page 396 note 5 Grandjean, F., “Deuxième note sur le feldspath néogène des terrains sedimentaires non metamorphiques,” Bull. Soc. Franc. Min., 1910, vol. xxxiii, pp. 92–7.Google Scholar
page 396 note 6 Grandjean, F., “Propriétés optiques et génèse du felspath néogène des sédiments du Bassin du Paris,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, cxlviii, pp. 723–5, 1909.Google Scholar
page 397 note 1 Grandjean, F., “Le felspath neogene des terrains sedimentaires non-metamorphiques,” Bull. Soc. franc. Min., xxxii, pp. 103–33, 1909.Google Scholar
page 397 note 2 Grandjean, F., “Deuxieme note sur les felspaths néogène des terrains sedimentaires non-metamorphiques,” Bull. Soc. franc. Min., xxxiii, pp. 92–7, 1910.Google Scholar
page 397 note 3 de Lapparent, J., “Sur les cristaux du feldspaths developpés dans les calcaires du Crétacé supérieur pyrénéen,” Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1918, vol. clxvii, pp. 784–6.Google Scholar
page 397 note 4 de Lapparent, J., “Cristaux de feldspath et de quartz dans les calcaires du Trias moyen d' Alsace et de Lorraine,” Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1920, vol. clxxi, pp. 862–5.Google Scholar
page 397 note 5 Lory, C., “Sur la présence de cristaux microscopiques de minéraux du groupe des feldspaths, dans certains calcaires jurassiques des Alpes,” Compt. Rend. Aced. Sci. Paris, 1886, vol. ciii, pp. 309–11.Google Scholar
page 398 note 1 Clarke, F. W., Bull. 695 U.S. Geol. Surv., 1920, p. 514.Google Scholar
page 398 note 2 Harris, J. E., “Some Absorption Phenomena in Soils and Kaolin,” Journ. Physical Chem., vol. xviii, 1914, p. 355.Google Scholar
page 398 note 3 Warington, R., “On the Part taken by Oxide of Iron and Alumina in the Absorptive Action of Soils,” Journ. Chem. Soc., vol. xxi, 1868, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4
- Cited by