Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:52:13.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—The true Horizon of the Mammoth. The Foreign Evidence and General Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In previous communications, to the GEOLOGICAL MAGAZINE I have subjected the evidence as to the age of the Mammoth in the British Islands to criticism, and I ventured to conclude that whereever we can find the remains of the Mammoth and its contemporaries undisturbed and in situ, these remains are found under and not over or in the drift. This, so far as I know, is the case in every recorded instance where the Mammoth beds and the drift have been found superimposed upon each other. Let us now turn to the Continent and test the problem there. If we are to test it in the same way, which I take to be the only satisfactory way, namely, by evidence of superposition, we must naturally limit our survey to countries where the drift actually occurs. First, let us turn to Switzerland.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1893

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 20 note 1 I overlooked the very important and notable case at Selsea, where the Mammalian bed is overlain by a deposit with boulders and grey wethers.

page 21 note 1 See Bull. Soc. Geol. de France, 2nd ser. vol. vii. 1858, p. 601.Google Scholar

page 21 note 2 Id. 602.

page 22 note 1 Bull. Soc. Geol. de France, ser. Hi. vol. iii. pp. 659660.Google Scholar

page 22 note 2 Le Préhistorique, pp. 216, 217.

page 23 note 1 Le Préhistorique, p. 312.

page 28 note 1 The two inner oval prominences have been largely cut away at some time in an injudicious attempt to develop the anterior part of the carapace.

page 31 note 1 I regret to have overlooked Mr. B. N. Peach's paper on Cyclus testudo, Carboniferous series, Langholm. (See Trans. Roy. Soc. Ediub. 1883, vol. xxx. pl. xxviii. figs. 9–9d p. 227.– H.W.Google Scholar