Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:07:58.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—On the Correlation of the Palæozoio Rocks of South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

The publication of the Annual Reports for 1898 and 1899 of the Cape Geological Commission, coupled with the recent account of the geology of the Transvaal Colony by Dr. Molengraaff, and of which a short abstract has appeared in this Magazine, adds considerably to the knowledge of South African geology. The succession of the rock formations at the Cape has been constantly used as a basis of classification for the rock systems south of the Zambesi. In his recent paper Dr. Molengraaff correlates the formations of the Transvaal Colony with those met with in the south-eastern provinces of Cape Colony, and emphasizes the fact that the three stages of the Pretoria, Dolomite, and Black Reef series of the Transvaal Colony may be compared with the Witteberg, Bokkeveld, and Table Mountain Sandstone series of the Cape. It may therefore be of service to show on what grounds this supposed correlation is based. To do this the succession at the Cape of the formations below the Beaufort Beds in the typical region of the south-eastern province will first be given.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 163 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. VIII (1901), pp. 475–8.Google Scholar

page 163 note 2 Reports, 1897 et seq.Google Scholar

page 164 note 1 Report for 1899, Cape Geological Commission.

page 165 note 1 Report for 1899, p. 83.

page 165 note 2 Rogers, A. W. & Schwarz, E. H. L.: Trans. Soc. Afr. Phil. Soc., vol. xi, pt. 2, pp. 113120.Google Scholar

page 165 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxx (1874), pp. 581680.Google Scholar