Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:54:14.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IV.—On Galerites albogalerus, Lamarck, syn. Echinoconus conicus, Breynius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. Martin Duncan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Next to Ananchytes ovata, there is probably no fossil Echinoid which is so well known to geologists and so common in collections as Galerites albogalerus, Lam. Described by Lamarck, studied by Forbes, and puzzled over by almost every naturalist who has classified the Echinoidea, this common yet most variable form has received a number of synonyms, and has been made to belong to four genera besides that in which it now rests.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1884 , pp. 10 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1884

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 10 note 1 Character:—Test circular or pentagonal, peristome central decagonular pentagonal, periproct independent of the genital apparatus either superior or inferior. Pores simple; divided into 1, Galerites proper with teeth, and 2, Echinoninæ, without teeth.Google Scholar

page 13 note 1 Lovén, Etudes sur les Echinoidées, Stockholm, 1872.Google Scholar

page 14 note 1 Vol. xxvii.Google Scholar

page 14 note 2 Vol. i. part 6, on the Echinoconidæ.Google Scholar

page 14 note 3 p. 221 et seq. plates xlix. figs. 2, 3, 4. Plate 1. fig. 1–6.Google Scholar

page 14 note 4 p. 213 et seq.Google Scholar

page 17 note 1 Fossil Echinoidea of Kachh and Kattywar, Pal. Indica, ser. xiv. vol. i. part 4, 1883.Google Scholar