No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
According to Professor Blanford the only example of this species in the Straehey Collection was the fragment which he figured. This is now in the British Museum collection [No. C. 5045]; it was transferred from the Museum of Practical Geology, labelled with one of that Museum's labels “Oolitic: Niti Pass. Ammonites scriptus (Stra.). Coll. by Col. Strachey.” The figures, which are all reversed, are not good. The portion of the fossil that is figured is entirely septate; the anterior part of the specimen that formed the base of the body-chamber is not included in the figure, nor does the figure show the shorter intermediate ribs which extend over the outer half of the lateral area of the whorl.
page 116 note 1 Oppel, A., “Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundären Ablagerungen von Spiti und Guari-Khorsum in Tibet”: Pal. Mittheil., iv (1863), p. 282, pl. lxxix,. figs. 1a-c.Google Scholar
page 116 note 2 Oppel, A., “Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundären Ablagerungen von Spiti und Gnari-Khorsum in Tibet”: Pal. Mittheil., iv (1863), p. 288, pl. lxxxii,. figs, 1a-c, 2a, b.Google Scholar
page 117 note 1 Journ. As. Soc. Bengal, vol. xxxii, No. 2 (1863), p. 128, pl. i, figs. 5a-c.
page 118 note 1 Oppel, A., ‘Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundäreu Ablagerungen von Spiti und Gnari-Khorsum in Tibet”: Pal. Mittheil., iv (1863), p. 280, pl. lxxx, figs, 1a, b.Google Scholar
page 118 note 2 Crick, G. C.: Proc. Malac. Soc., vol. v, pt. 4 (April, 1903), p. 287.Google Scholar
page 119 note 1 Other specimens are similarly numbered. Thus, A. medea [C. 5047], pl. xix, tigs. 5a, b, is marked “18”; A. Wallichii [C. 7675a], pl. xix, figs. 1a, b, is marked “12”; and A. Wallichii [C. 5041], pl. xv, figs, 1a-c (which is also one of Gray's type-specimens), is marked “10.”
page 119 note 2 G. C. Crick: op. cit., p. 288.
page 119 note 3 Oppel, A., “Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundären Ablagerungen von Spiti und Gnari-Khorsum in Tibet”: Pal. Mittheil., iv (1863), p. 281, pl. lxxx,: figs. 2a, b.Google Scholar
page 120 note 1 Crick, G. C.: Proc. Malac. Soc., vol. v, No. 4 (April, 1903), pp. 290 et seq.Google Scholar
page 120 note 2 Oppel, A., “Ueber ostindische Fossilreste aus den secundären Ablagerungen von Spiti und Gnari-Khorsum in Tibet”: Pal. Mittheil., iv (1863), p. 280, pi. lxxviii, figs. 3a-c (and pl. lxxxiii, figs. 2a, b).Google Scholar
page 121 note 1 F. Stoliczka (Mem. Geol. Surv. India, vol. v, pt. 1, 1865) says (p. 93), “Fig. lc in Strachey's Pal. pi. 18 gives no good idea of the true form of the lobes and saddles. The figure was evidently taken from a specimen with a very much eroded surface.”
page 122 note 1 See Diener, C.: Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Pal. Indica, ser. xv, vol. ii, pt. 2: (1895), p. 53 et seq.Google Scholar