Article contents
IV.—Fossil Echinoidea From Sinai And Egypt
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
The collections of Echinoidia described in the following report were made by Messrs. Barron, Beadnell, and Hume during their work for the Egyptian Geological Survey, and were entrusted to me for description by the Director, Captain Lyons, R.E.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1906
References
page 216 note 1 [Plate XI will appear with the second part of Professor Gregory's paper in the June Number of the Geological Magazine.—Editor.]
page 216 note 2 Fourtau: Notes Éch. foss. Égypte, 1900, p. 17.Google Scholar
page 216 note 3 Fourtau: ibid.., p. 21; and Crét. massif Abu Roash, C.R., vol. cxxxi (1900).
page 216 note 4 Fourtau, Révision Éch. foss. Égypte: Mém. Inst. Égypt., vol. iii, fasc. 8 (1899), pp. 607, 623.Google Scholar
page 217 note 1 Max Blanckenhorn, Neues zur Geol. & Pal. Aegyptens: Zeit. deut. Geol. Ges., 1900, p. 33.Google Scholar
page 217 note 2 Beadnell, Cret. Eeg. Abu Roash: Rep. Geol. Surv. Egypt, 1900, pt. ii (1902), pp. 18, 19, 20, etc.Google Scholar
page 217 note 3 Dacqué, Mitth. Kreidecomplex Abu Roash: Palæontogr., voI. xxx (1903), p. 354.Google Scholar
page 217 note 4 Fourtau, Révision Éch. foss. Égypte: Mém. lust. Égypt., vol. iii, fasc. 8.(1899), p. 718, pi.iii, figs. 11, 12.Google Scholar
page 218 note 1 From its double rows of granules around the bases of the ambital interambulacral tubercles.
page 219 note 1 Pseudodiadema libycum, Desor, 1858: Syn. Éch. foss., p. 72.Google Scholar Heterodiadema libycum, Cotteau, 1864: Pal. franç., Terr. crét., vol. vii, p. 522, pi. 1124. Cotteau, Peron, & Gauthier, 1879: Éch. foss. Algér., fasc. 5, p. 201, pl. xv, fig. 5. Gauthier, 1889: E'ch. foss. S. Hauts-Plat. Tunisie, p. 68.Google Scholar
page 219 note 2 Like Acanthechinus.
page 220 note 1 Having two small plates (or patella) in the compound ambulacral plates.
page 221 note 1 P. de Loriol: Crét. Fauna Portugal, vol. ii (1887), Échinodermes, p. 62, pl. x, figs. 3–6.Google Scholar
page 221 note 2 Cotteau, : Pal. franç., Ter. crét, vol. vii (1867), p. 823, pl. 1197.Google Scholar
page 222 note 1 Cotteau, : Pal. franç., Terr. crét. (1864), p. 587, pl. 1139, figs. 7–12.Google Scholar
page 222 note 2 From the plan of the tuberculation.
page 222 note 3 Cyphosoma sancti-arromani, Gauthier, 1889: E'ch. foss. Sud Hauts-Plateaux Tunisie, pp. 81–82, pl. v, figs. 8,12, 13, non figs. 9–11.Google Scholar
page 224 note 1 From Jebel Gunneh, the locality of the type-specimen.
page 224 note 2 de Loriol, P.: Faune Crét. Portugal, vol. ii (1887), Échinod., p. 52, pi. ix, fig. 4, from Up.Carentonian.Google Scholar
page 224 note 3 Phymosoma major, Coquand, 1863: Géol. et Pal. Constantine, Mém. Soc. Émul. Provence, vol. ii, p. 256, pi. xxvii, figs. 16, 17.Google Scholar
page 224 note 4 Cotteau, : Pal. franç., Terr. crét., vol. vii (1864), pi. 1143, fig. 5.Google Scholar
page 224 note 5 Gauthier: Éch. foss. Sud Hauts-Plateaux Tunisie, pi. v, figs. 9–11, non figs. 8, 12, 13.Google Scholar
page 225 note 1 Cotteau, Peron, & Gauthier: Éch. foss. Algér., fasc. 5 (1879), p. 172.Google Scholar
page 225 note 2 D'Orbigny: Pal. franç., Terr. crét., vol. vi, p. 544, pi. 1005, figs. 7–9.Google Scholar
page 225 note 3 See e.g. the figure in Cotteau & Triger: Éch. Dep. Sarthe, p. 368, pi. liii, figs. 1, 3.Google Scholar
page 225 note 4 See Desor: Syn. Éch. foss., p. 174, pi. xxiii, figs. 6–9.Google Scholar
page 225 note 5 Peron & Gauthier: Éch. foss. Algér., fasc. 6 (1880), p. 86. pi. vi, figs. 3–7; fasc. 7 (1881), p. 91.Google Scholar
page 226 note 1 Compt, . Rend., vol. lxxviii (1867), p. 198.Google Scholar
page 226 note 2 Person & Gauthier: Éch. foss. Algér., fasc. 5, p. 172, pl. xii, figs. 3–6.Google Scholar
- 10
- Cited by