Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:36:22.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction to papers on the Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

B. S. Norford
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, 3303–33rd Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada.

Abstract

The Working Group has the responsibility of recommending a specific level within a suitable stratigraphic section to serve as the global stratotype for the Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary. Commencing in 1974, comprehensive studies culminated in a plenary session in Calgary in 1985 resulting in decisions on the ‘golden-spike’ principle of selecting the boundary at a horizon just below the first influx of nematophorous graptolites. Conodonts are to be used as the primary guide for the selection of the specific horizon and the global stratotype section must have potential for studies using paleomagnetism, geochemistry and other non-biological correlation tools. The specific horizon will correspond approximately to the base of the Tremadoc Series of Wales and slightly higher than the base of Canadian Series as used in western North America.

The Calgary meeting considered the Broom Point and Green Point sections in Newfoundland, Canada, and the Xiaoyangqiao section at Dayangcha, China, as prime candidates to serve as the global stratotype. A delegation from the Working Group inspected the Dayangcha sections in 1986. For this visit, comprehensive documentation and description of the sequence were prepared and published and are briefly summarized in the present issue.

Specific uncertainties remain to be resolved for the Dayangcha and Newfoundland stratigraphic sections before the Working Group will be ready to recommend selection of a global stratotype.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassett, M. G. & Dean, W. T. (eds) 1982. The Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary: Sections, Fossil Distributions, and Correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series No. 3, Cardiff, 227 pp.Google Scholar
Jun-yuan, Chen, Erdtmann, B.-D., We-li, Gong, Hui-ming, Li, Yao-Kun, Lin, Yi-yuan, Qian, Xian-chong, Tao, Ying-xi, Wang, Zong-zhe, Wang Jie-dong, Yang, Lei-ming, Yin & Jun-ming, Zhang 1986. Aspects of Cambrian–Ordovician Boundary in Dayangcha, China; pp. 1410, pls 1–98. Beijing: China Prospect Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. A. 1979. Sequence and correlation of Tremadoc graptolite assemblages; Alcheringa 3, pp. 719.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1973. The Cambro-Ordovician boundary. Lethaia 6, pp. 423439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, H. 1875. On the succession of the ancient rocks in the vicinity of St David's, Pembrokeshire, with special reference to those of the Arenig and Llandeilo Groups, and their fossil content. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 31, pp. 167–95, pls 8–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapworth, C. 1879. On the tripartite classification of the Lower Paleozoic rocks. Geological Magazine, New Series, Decade 2, 6, pp. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, D. J. 1977. The Silurian–Devonian Boundary Committee. A final report, pp. 134. In the Silurian–Devonian Boundary. Final report of the Committee on the Silurian–Devonian Boundary within IUGS Commission on Stratigraphy and a state of the art report for Project Ecostratigraphy (ed. Martinsson, A.), IUGS Series A, No. 5, vi + 349 pp. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuch-handlung.Google Scholar
Wright, A. D. 1976. Preface. pp. 3, 4. In the Ordovician System: proceedings of a Palaeontological Association symposium, Birmingham, September, 1974 (ed. Bassett, M. G.); 696 pp. University of Wales Press and National Museum of Wales, Cardiff.Google Scholar