Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:20:15.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—On some Jurassic Species of Cheilostomata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. W. Gregory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The extraordinary abundance of Bryozoa of the order Cheilostomata which occurs throughout the Cainozoic era,incomparison with their scarcity in earlier formations, has often been remarked. Interesting explanations of the suddenness of their appearance have, moreover, been offered by those who do not attach so much importance, as do some, to the imperfection of the geological record. Cheilostomata are not unknown from earlier deposits: the Cretaceous system has yielded a fair number, while even as early as the Silurian species have been found. Though doubts have been thrown on these early records, there seems no sufficient reason to discredit them. Even if Prof. Nicholson's Hippothoa inflata (Hall) should turn out to be a Stomntopora, which, if the figure be correct, is most unlikely, there remain many species in later Palæozoic deposits: such are those belonging to Prof. James Hall's genus Paleschara? which Mr. Ulrich accepts as Chilostomatons, though Prof, von Zittel includes it doubtfully with the Ptilodictyonidæ. Some of the specimens of Lichenalia, etc., figured by Hall, as well as the same author's Cystopora geniculata, may also belong to this order.

Type
Research Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , February 1894 , pp. 61 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1894

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 61 note 1 Nicholson, H. A., Descriptions of Polyzoa from the Silurian Formation, Rep. Geol. Surv. Ohio, vol. ii. Palæontology. 1875, p. 268,Google Scholar pl. xxv. fig. 1. The Alecio inflata of Hall, Palæontology of New York, vol. i. 1847, p. 77, pi. xxxi. fig. 7.Google Scholar

page 61 note 2 James Hall, ibid. vol. vi. Corals and Bryozoa, 1887, e.g. Paleschara dissimilis, p. 35, pi. XT. fig. 11.Google Scholar

page 61 note 3 Ulrich, E. O., Palæozoic Bryozoa, Palæontology of Illinois, part ii. sect. vi. Geol. Surv. Illinois, vol. viii. 1890, p. 366.Google Scholar

page 61 note 4 Zittel, K. von, Handbuch der Palaeontologie, Palaeozoologie, Bd. I. Abth. I. If. 4, 1880, p. 604.Google Scholar

page 61 note 5 James Hall, ibid. vol. vi. 1887, e.g. pi. xxx. figs. 5 and 6; pi. xxxi. figs. 12, 17, 20, 22, and 29.

page 61 note 6 Ibid. p. 103, pi. lxvi. figs. 7–9.

page 61 note 7 Nicholson, H. A. and Lydekker, R., a Manual of Palæontology, 3rd edit. 1889, vol. i. p. 634.Google Scholar

page 61 note 8 Michelin, H., Iconographie Zoophytologique, Paris, 1846, p. 243, pi. Ivii. fig. 12.Google Scholar

page 61 note 9 Haime, J., Description des Bryozoaires fossiles de la formation Jurassique, Mém. Soc. Géol. France, ser. 2, t. v. 1854, p. 217.Google Scholar

page 61 note 10 Phillips, J., Illustrations of the Geology of Yorkshire. Part I. The Yorkshire Coast. 1829, p. 143, pi. vii. fig. 8.Google Scholar

page 61 note 11 Morris, J., Catalogue of British Fossils, 1843, p. 39.Google Scholar

page 62 note 1 Trans. Zool. Soc. London, vol. xiii. pt. vi. 1893, p. 239.Google Scholar

page 62 note 2 So named as it is the first recorded Jurassic species of this genus and family.

page 63 note 1 Cellepora bipunctata, Goldfuss, Pet. Germ Bd. I. Ht. 1, 1827, p. 27,Google Scholar pi. ix. fig. 7, and Hagenow, , Die Bryozoen der Maastrichter Kreidebildung, 1851, p. 76, pi. ix fig. 9.Google Scholar

page 63 note 2 Cellpora velamen, Goldfuss, op. cit. p. 26,Google Scholar pl. ix. fig. 4, and Hagenow, , op. cit. p. 97. pi. xii. fig. 1,inwhich the type is refigured.Google Scholar

page 63 note 3 Pal., Franc. Terr. Cret. t. v. p. 551,Google Scholar pl. 607, figs. 11–12. Flustr in a regularis, D'Orb., ibid. p. 306, pi. 702, figs. 17–19. Flustrina elegans, p. 302, pi. 701, figs. 17–19, appears to be only a worn variety of this species.Google Scholar

page 63 note 4 Novák, Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Bryozoen der böhmischen Kreideformation Denk., k. Akad. Wiss. Wien. Bd. xxxvii. Abth. II. 1877, p. 92, pi. i. figs. 1–3.Google Scholar

page 63 note 5 Th., Marsson, Die Bryozoen der weissen Schreibkreid der Insel Rügen. Pal. Abth. Bd. IV. Ht. 1. 1887, p. 59, pi. v. fig. 17.Google Scholar

page 64 note 1 Hagenow, , op. cit. p 95, pi. xi. figs. 10 and 11.Google Scholar

page 64 note 2 Eschara piriformis, Goldfuss, op. cit. p. 24,Google Scholar pi. viii. fig. 10; Hagenow, op. cit. p. 75, pi. ix. fig. 6; pi. xi. fig. 6.Google Scholar

page 64 note 3 Esehara santonensis, D'Orbigny, op. cit. p. 109, pi. 603, figs. 1–3; pi. 673, fig. i.Google Scholar

page 64 note 4 Biflustra solea, Novák, , op. cit. pp. 94–95, pl. iii. figs. 12–16.Google Scholar