Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T22:56:58.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—Notes on the Fossil Flora of Eastern Australia and Tasmania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Ottokar Feistamantel
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India, Calcutta.

Extract

Through the kindness of the late Rev. W. B. Clarke, of Sydney, I had the opportunity of examining two collections of fossil plants from Australia, which that gentleman had kindly placed at my disposal, together with explanatory notes, which he communicated to me in private letters.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1879

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 486 note 1 This seems to differ from M'Coy's original form from Victoria.

page 486 note 2 These two are new for Australia.

page 486 note 3 Physic. Descr. of N. S. Wales and Van Diemans Land, 1845.

page 486 note 4 Tinned States Exploring Expedition, Geology, 1849.

page 486 note 5 Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xx. ser. 2, 1847.Google Scholar

page 486 note 6 In Mines and Miner. Statistics of N. S. "Wales, 1875.

page 486 note 7 Palæontographica, 1878–79.

page 486 note 8 On some Ichthyolites from flew Wales, S.Q. J. G. S. vol. xx. 1864, p. 1.Google Scholar

page 486 note 9 I class it with Thinnfeldia.

page 487 note 1 Several species described by myself.

page 487 note 2 This is on the authority of Prof. M'Coy, who quotes from Arowa a Glossopteris linearis, M'Coy, together with an Otopteris ovatu, M'Coy, which, however, is a Rhacopteris, comp. inaquilatera, Göp.

page 488 note 1 In Trans. E. Soc. of Victoria, vol. v. 1860, p. 104.Google Scholar

page 488 note 2 Bull. de l'Acad. Royale de Belgique, 1875, vol. xxxix. pp. 258–263.Google Scholar

page 490 note 1 His specimens differ, however, somewhat from Morris's original type—but later quite similar forms were also found in the Jerusalem's Basin, Tasmania; Morris's specimens were altogether badly preserved.

page 491 note 1 This is probably a misprint for Mendelsohni.—Edit. Geol. Mag.