Article contents
II.—Notes on some Fish-remains from the Lower Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous of Belgium, Collected by Monsieur A. Houzeau de Lehaie
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
Some time ago the writer was favoured by Monsieur A. Houzeau de Lehaie with the opportunity of studying his extensive collection of teeth and other remains of fishes from the Bruxellian Eocene, near Brussels, and the “Craie brune phosphatée de Ciply,” near Mons. Monsieur Houzeau has generously presented a fine series of these fossils to the British Museum, and the following notes are based upon the collection.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1891
References
page 104 note 1 Le Hon, H., “Préliminaires d'un Mémoire sur les Poissons Tertiaires de Belgique” (1871).Google Scholar
page 104 note 2 Winkler, T. C., “Mémoire sur des Dents de Poissons du Terrain bruxellien,” Archiv. Mus. Teyler, vol. iii. (1874), pp. 295–304,Google Scholar pl. vii.; also ibid. vol. iv. (1876), pp. 16–48, pl. ii.
page 104 note 3 Van Beneden, P. J., “Recherches sur quelques Poissons fossiles de Belgique,”Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg. [2], vol. xxxi. (1871), pp. 153–179.Google Scholar Also “Notice sur un nouveau Poisson du Terrain bruxellien,” ibid. vol. xxxv. (1873), pp. 255–259, with plate (Homorhynchus bruxelliensis).
page 104 note 4 Dollo, L., “Première Note sur les Téléostéens du Bruxellien (Eocène moyen) de la Belgique,” Bull. Soc. Belg. Géol. etc. vol. iii. (1889), Proc.-Verb. pp. 218–226 Google Scholar (Arius Egertoni).
page 105 note 1 Catal. Foss. Fishes Brit. Mus. pt. i. p. 336.
page 106 note 1 Davis, J. W., Trans. Roy. Dublin Soc. [2], vol. iv. (1890), pp. 373, 398.Google Scholar
page 107 note 1 Trigonodus primus, Winkler, T. C., Archiv. Mus. Teyler, vol. iv. (1876), p. 14,Google Scholar pl. i. figs. 18 21.
page 107 note 2 Scaldia biforis, Le Hon, H., Prélim. Mém. Poiss. Tert. Belg. (1871), p. 7,Google Scholar with figs.
page 108 note 1 Woodward, and Sherborn, , “Catalogue of British Fossil Vertebrata” (1890), p. 111.Google Scholar
page 109 note 1 Woodward, Smith, “A Synopsis of the Vertebrate Fossils of the English Chalk,” Proc. Geol. Assoc. vol. x. (1888), p. 315,Google Scholar pl. i. figs. 5, 6.
page 109 note 2 Agassiz, L., Rech. Poiss. Foss. vol. iv. (1839), p. 168,Google Scholar pl. xviii. fig. 1.
page 109 note 3 Gervais, P., Zool. et Pal. Franç. (1852),Google Scholar pl. lxix. figs. 14–16.
page 109 note 4 von Zittel, K. A., Handb. Palæont. vol. iii. (1888), p. 298.Google Scholar
page 110 note 1 Sismonda, E., Mem. R. Accad. Sci. Torino [2], vol. x. (1849), p. 25.Google Scholar
page 111 note 1 Rutot, A., “Note sur l'Extension de Lamna elegans, Ag., à travers les Terrains Crétacé et Tertiaire, Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg. vol. ii. (1875), p. 35.Google Scholar
page 111 note 2 Coquand, H., Descript. Géol., etc., Départ. Charente, vol. ii. (1860), p. 98.Google Scholar
page 111 note 3 Roemer, F., Kreidebild. von Texas (1852), p. 29,Google Scholar pl. i. fig. 7.
page 111 note 4 Davis, J. W., Trans. Roy. Dublin Soc. [2], vol. iv. (1890), p. 398,Google Scholar pl. xl. figs. 11–17.
page 113 note 1 Nicholson, and Lydekker, , Manual Palæont. vol. ii. (1890), p. 984.Google Scholar
page 113 note 2 Heckel, J. J., Denkschr. k. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. xi. (1856), p. 202.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by