Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:15:30.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—The Base of the Gault in Eastern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

A.M. Davies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a paper published in this MagazineinMarch, 1895, Dr. J. W.Gregory, incidentally discussing the exact age of the base of the Gault Clay, wrote:“Hoplites interruptus seems restrictedin[Eastern] England to the Folkestone area and the Eed Chalk.” Although some of his conclusions on that point were modified later, the general statement quoted above, with the qualification indicated by the bracketed word ‘Eastern,’ does not seem to have been challenged. Having myself found H. interrnplus at the base of the Gault at several places in Eastern England, I have been led to look up previous records, with the result that I am convinced that the zone of H. interruptus is represented in the lowest beds of the Gault Clay over a large part of that area.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , April 1899 , pp. 159 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1899

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 159 note 1 “Fossils from Lower Greensand of Great Chart”: Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, Vol. II, p. 97.Google Scholar

page 159 note 2 Ibid., pp. 187–9.

page 160 note 1 Proc. Geol. Assoc, vol. xv, p. 184.Google Scholar

page 161 note 1 “Handbook of Historical Geology,” p. 412.Google Scholar

page 161 note 2 Reid & Strahan, “Geology of the Isle of Wight.”

page 161 note 3 “Catalogue of Fossils from the Cretaceous Beds of Berkshire, in the Collection of Davey, E.C., F.G.S.“ (Wantage, 1877).Google Scholar

page 162 note 1 Loc. cit., p.101.Google Scholar

page 162 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xxx, p. 342.Google Scholar