No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
III.—Some Disputed Points in the Crystallisation of the Constituent Minerals of Granite
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Extract
In writing my little paper on vein-quartz I was particularly anxious not to introduce controversial matter, but to be strictly orthodox throughout. After the paper was published I was much perturbed to find that I had unwittingly come into collision with two incidental remarks in General McMahon's most interesting paper on the Satlej granite, which was the subject of his address to Section C at Belfast. My oversight arose owing to the said remarks being incidental, and no stress having been laid upon their paramount importance.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1903
References
page 397 note 1 Derivation from felspar I have since then occasionally noticed; but my slides do not seem to contain an indisputable case of derivation from mica.
page 399 note 1 Geol. Rep. on Devon and Corwall, p. 387.
page 399 note 2 Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1900, p. 593 et seq.
page 399 note 3 “Anticipations,” p. 368.
page 401 note 1 Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1877, p. 236.
page 401 note 2 Loc. cit., p. 233.
page 402 note 1 “On Variation in the Critical Point of Carbon Dioxide in Minerals,” etc.: Journal Chemical Society, 1876. Reprint, p. 12.