Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:02:52.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.—On Jurassic Ammonites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

In a former communication (Geol. Mag. Dec. III. Vol. IV. No. 9, p. 396, 1887), when pointing out how Reinecke's Amm. serpentinus had been misunderstood, I gave as a synonym, but with a query, Sowerby's Amm. Strangewaysi. As I have, since then, examined the type-specimen of the latter species contained in the collection of the Natural History Museum, and as Mr. E. Walford kindly forwarded me for my determination a capital specimen from Byfield, I have been able to satisfactorily settle the identity of these forms. Except being evolute carinate Ammonites, the two species have hardly a feature in common.

Discoidal, compressed, hollow-carinate. Whorls flattened, ornamented with genuine sickle-shaped ribs, which, though less conspicuous in size on the body-chamber, are there more distinctly bent. Ventral area marked by the prolonged forward sweep of the ribs, and surmounted by a well-marked hollow-carina.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1889

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 202 note 1 Hitherto unknown (Haug). It agrees almost exactly with my fig. 28, pl. A. (Monogr, . Ammonites, 1889, part iii.Google Scholar), but the inferior lateral lobe is a little larger and is nearer the edge.

page 202 note 2 I take the opportunity of thanking the officers of the Natural History and Jermyn Street Museums for their kindness and courtesy.