Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:11:26.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II.—Creechbarrow in Purbeck.—No. 2 (continued)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Extract

Varieties of the Creechbarrow Limestone.—There are considerable extremes in this respect, ranging from a soft marly deposit, which soils the fingers like whitening, to a hard compact rock, which takes a good polish. Unquestionably the most dense and compact lime-stone is that near the summit, whilst the soft marly beds are on the northern slope, and especially near the 500 feet contour, where some of them are earthy and contain a considerable amount of impurity, so that they may at least be called marly limestones. On the other hand, there are compact white limestones, where nests of dog-tooth spar form no inconsiderable portion of the mass. Quartz grains may be noted on most of the weathered surfaces.

The more compact and denser limestones, which prevail near the summit, may be roughly divided into non-pisolitic and pisolitic rocks. Thus, for instance, I have before me (Group 1) specimens of a very heavy and partially calcitic rock. It is a hard whitish limestone without pisolites, but largely interspersed with buff-coloured patches, not unlike some dolomites. Calcitic nests and strings occur, and also strings and stars of black oxide of manganese: the external surface is rough and somewhat honeycombed, and full of curious impressions, some of which may have had an organic origin.

Group 2 comprises those specimens where the pisolitic character is indicated, but not very obviously. A characteristic specimen may be described as follows:—A large fragment of a creamy white tufaceous limestone, with specks and threads of black oxide of manganese in places: flattened pisolitic bodies in brownish calcite are numerous, but not very distinct.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 197 note 1 The accompanying Plate is intended to illustrate concretionary or pisolitic action as well as to serve the palæontology of the limestone.

page 200 note 1 According to Professor Rupert Jones, writing of the physical features of the Bagshot district in 1880 (Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. vi, p. 437), “the Bagshot sands are the shallow water and western equivalents of the great Nummulitic formation, which is represented in the east by the thick Nummulite limestones, deposited in the open ocean of the period.”

page 200 note 2 In my paper in the Geological Magazine (1902, p. 251), I referred this form to P. media, Woodw., a synonym of P. lenta, Solander, the latter being the correct name. The history of P. lenta is rather a singular one. It was first described by Solander (1766) in Brander's Foss. Hants, and is regarded as ranging from the Woolwich (and Reading) Beds to the Hempstead, Bembridge, and Headon Beds. Hence it is essentially an Eocene and Oligocene species.