Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:55:31.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—A Chapter in the History of Meteorites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Walter Flight
Walter Flight
Affiliation:
Of the Department of Mineralogy, British Museum; Assistant Examiner in Chemistry, University of London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By the publication of Die Chemische Natur der Meteoriten, in 1870, Professor Rammelsberg accomplished the task which he had set himself, that of presenting to students of mineralogy a careful digest of the scattered contributions of the time to the literature of meteorites. Since that date no similar work of reference has been issued. Buchner's papers, intituled Die Meteoriten in Sammlungen, the first of which was issued at an earlier date than Rammelsberg's memoir, do not apparently continue to be published, the last one having appeared in Poggendorff's Annalen in 1869. It is from this period that I propose to take up the thread, and to give in the following pages a digest of all that has been published on the subject of meteorites since the beginning of that year.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1875 , pp. 16 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1875

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 17 note 1 In his address “Ueber die Entwickelung der Geologie in den letzten 50 Jahren,” delivered before the German Naturalists' Association at Leipzig in 1872, Von Dechen alluded to shepardite (anderthalbfach kieselsaure Magnesia) as a characteristic meteoric mineral.

page 17 note 2 Fahnehjelm, O.. Meteorfallet i Fittja socken af Upsala län d. 1 Januari, 1869, Oefversigt Vet. Akad. Förd. 1869, No. 1, 59.Google Scholar—Nordenskjöld, A. E.. Kongl. Svenska. Vetensk. Akad. Handl. viii. No. 9Google Scholar; Pogg. Ann. cxxi., 205.Google Scholar—Lindström., G. Kemisk Undersokning af Meteorstenarne från Hessle. Kongl, Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Förd., 1869, No. 8.Google Scholar—Fredholm, K. A.. Om Meteorstensfallet vid Hessle. Leipzig: FritechGoogle Scholar.—Daubrée, G. A.. Compt. rend., lxviii., 363Google Scholar.

page 20 note 1 Buchner, O.. Pogg. Ann., cxxxyii, 176.Google Scholar—vom Rath, G.. Pogg. Ann., cxxxvii., 328.Google Scholar—Weiss, C. E.. Pogg. Ann., cxxxvii., 617.Google Scholar—Neumayer, G.. Sitzber. Wien. Akad., lx., 229Google Scholar.—Reinsch, P.. Lithographic “Suite Mikroscopischer Praeparate” of this Meteorite, issued March, 1872; and Tageblatt 45, Versammlung der Naturforscher in Leipzig, 1872, 132Google Scholar.

page 23 note 1 Loomis, E. Amer. Jour. Sc., 1869, xlviii. 145Google Scholar.

page 23 note 2 May 20th–22nd, appears at the present time to be a period during which meteoric falls may be looked for. During the last six years the following five falls have occurred:

page 23 note 3 De Limur, . Compt. rend., liviii. 1338.Google Scholar—Pisani, F.. Compt. rend., lxriii. 1489Google Scholar.

page 24 note 1 von Baumhauer, E. H.. Archives Néerlandaises, vi. No. 4 (1871).Google Scholar—Daubrée, G. A.. Compt. rend., 1871, 16th 12Google Scholar.

page 25 note 1 Atkinson, E.. Jour. Prakt. Chem., 1856, 357.Google ScholarPhil. Mag. xi. 141Google Scholar.

page 25 note 2 Rammelsberg, C.. Zeit. Deutseh. Geol. Gesellsch., 1871, 734Google Scholar.

page 25 note 3 Willet, J. E. and Smith, J. L.. Amer. Jour. Sc. 1. 335, and 339Google Scholar.

page 26 note 1 Smith, A. T.. The Standard, 11, 1869Google Scholar.

page 27 note 1 Coumbray, M., Jour. Geol. Soc., xxvi. 415.Google ScholarGEOI. MAG., VII. 236.Google Scholar—Greg, R. P.. Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1871.Google Scholar—Bullet. Meteorologico, ix. 4.Google Scholar—Rose, G.. Monatsber. Berlin Ak., 11, 1870.Google Scholar—Tschermak, G.. Sitz. Wien. Ak. 06, 1870Google Scholar.

page 27 note 2 Rose, G.. Monatsber. Berlin Ak., 1871, 804Google Scholar.

page 27 note 3 Silliman, B.. Amer. Jour. Sc. [3] vi. 18Google Scholar.

page 28 note 1 Shepard, C. U.. Amer. Jour. Sc., [3] iii. 438Google Scholar.

page 28 note 2 Mallet, J. W.. Amer. Jour. Sc., [3] ii. 10Google Scholar; Brit. Assoc. Report (Brighton), 1872, 77Google Scholar; Proc. Royal, Soc. xx. 365Google Scholar; Pogg. Ann. cxlvii. 134Google Scholar.

page 29 note 1 The residue left on treating the Tuczon iron with acid appears to have borne a great resemblance to this substance. Compare with the description given in Buchner's Meteoriten, p. 183.

page 30 note 1 Smith, J. L.. Mineralogy and Chemistry, 348.Google Scholar—Lapham, J. A.. Am. Jour. Sc., [3] iii. 69Google Scholar.