Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:25:58.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growth and Form of Brachiopod Shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

M. J. S. Rudwick
M. J. S. Rudwick
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The form of a brachiopod shell is the product of the rates of growth operating at all points on the valve edges during successive stages of growth. Shell form is analysed here in terms of these rates of growth, the rate at each point being resolved into component rates. If the antero-posterior growth gradients are linear, the shell is rectimarginate; if non-linear, the lateral commissure is “flexed” throughout ontogeny. Localized anomalies in the growth rate may modify either of these basic growth patterns at any stage in ontogeny. They produce deflections in the commissure, and these generally produce deformations in the valve surfaces (e.g. folds, sulci, costae). Two major varieties of external hinge structure are defined: strophic shells have a true hinge line and may also have interareas; non-strophic shells have no true hinge line but may have palintropes. The implications of this formal analysis are examined in relation to the systematic description of the shell form.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 1959 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bancroft, B. B., 1928. On the notational representation of the rib-system in Orthacea. Mem. Proc. Manch. Lit. Phil. Soc., lxxii, 53–90.Google Scholar
Buckman, S. S., 1907. Brachiopod morphology: Cincta, Eudesia, and the development of ribs. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxiii, 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckman, S. S., 1918. The Brachiopoda of the Namyau Beds, Northern Shan States, Burma. Palaeont. Indica (n.s.), iii, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Cloud, P. E., 1942. Terebratuloid Brachiopoda of the Silurian and Devonian. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap., No. 38.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S., 1932. Problems of relative growth. London.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., 1955. A history of the classification of the phylum Brachiopoda. London.Google Scholar
Owen, G., 1953. The shell in the Lamellibranchia. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., xciv, 57–70.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H., 1937. Zur Morphogenie der Rhynchonelliden. Sencken-bergiana, xix, 22–60.Google Scholar
Thompson, d'A. W., 1942. On growth and form. Cambridge, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A., 1927. Brachiopod morphology and general (Recent and Tertiary). New Zealand Board Sci. and Art, Manual No. 7.Google Scholar
Williams, A., 1956. The calcareous shell of the Brachiopoda and its importance to their classification. Biol. Rev., xxxi, 243–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar