Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T07:00:41.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Granitization Process and its Limitations as Exemplified in Certain Parts of New South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Germaine A. Joplin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an attempt to dissect the granitization process in an area of regional metamorphism, it is suggested that granite is forcibly injected during strong compression, that the compressional wave passes upwards and outwards in advance of the magma, and that several changes take place before its arrival. Six stages in this process are recognized in the Cooma and Albury districts of N.S.W.: (1) Regional Metamorphism, (2) Superimposed Thermal Metamorphism, (3) Permeation without Magmatic Addition, (4) Addition from an Attenuated Magma, (5) Formation of a Potassic Wave-Front, and (6) Injection of the Magma as Concordant Intrusions. The conditions favouring granitization are discussed and the question of basic fronts is considered.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , February 1952 , pp. 25 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. H., 1937. Granitization, Alkalization, and Related Phenomena in the Northern Inyo Range of California–Nevada. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlviii, 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, G., 1893. On an Intrusion of Muscovite–Biotite Gneiss in the South-eastern Highlands of Scotland. and its accompanying Metamorphism. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlix, 343.Google Scholar
Barth, T. F. W., 1936. Structural and Petrologic Studies in Dutchess County, New York. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlvii. 840.Google Scholar
Billings, M., 1937. Introduction of Potash during Regional Metamorphism in Western New Hampshire. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., xlix, 297.Google Scholar
Brammall, A., and Harwood, H. F., 1932. The Dartmoor Granites: their Genetic Relationships. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxviii, 171–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. R., 1914. The Geology of the Cooma District, N.S.W., Part I. Journ. Roy. Soc. N.S. W., xlviii, 179.Google Scholar
Buddington, A. F., 1948. Origin of Granitic Rocks of the North-West Adirondacks. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxviii, 22.Google Scholar
Eskola, P., 1948. The Nature of Metasomatism in Processes of Granitization. Inter. Geol. Cong., 18(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Fenner, C. N., 1914. The Mode of Formation of Certain Gneisses in the Highlands of New Jersey. Journ. Geol., xxii, 694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. M., 1920. Injektionmetamorphose im Stavangergebeite. Videnskap. Skrift. I, Mat.-Nat. Klasse, x, 15–19.Google Scholar
Harker, A., 1909. The Natural History of the Igneous Rocks. London, pp. 326–7.Google Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1935. Diorite-Limestone Reaction at Ben Bullen, N.S.W.: A Study in Contamination. Geol. Mag., lxxii, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1942. Petrological Studies in the Ordovician of New South Wales. I, The Cooma Complex. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lxvii, 156–196.Google Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1943. Idem. II, The Northern Extension of the Cooma Complex. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lxviii, 159–183.Google Scholar
Joplin, G. A., 1947. Idem. IV, The Northern Extension of the North-East Victorian Metamorphic Complex. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W., lxxii, 87–124.Google Scholar
King, B. C., 1947. The Textural Features of the Granites and Invaded Rocks of the Singo Batholith of Uganda and their Petrogenetic Significance. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., ciii, 56.Google Scholar
Lapadu-Hargues, P., 1945. Sur 1'Existence et la Nature de l'apport chemique dans certaines series cristallophylliennes. Bull. Geol. Soc. France (Ser. 15), v, 255–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misch, P., 1949 a. Metasomatic Granitization of Batholithic Dimensions. I, Synkinematic Granitization in Nanga Parbat Area, North-West Himalayas. Amer. Journ. Sci., ccxlvii, 209–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misch, P., 1949 b. Idem. II, Static Granitization in Sheku Area, North-West Yunnan (China). Amer. Journ. Sci., ccxlvii, 372–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., 1931. The Dhoon (Isle of Man) Granite: A Study in Contamination. Miner. Mag., xxii, 505.Google Scholar
Nockolds, S. R., 1933. Some Theoretical Aspects of Contamination in Acid Magmas. Journ. Geol., xli, 584.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1931. The Geology of Central Sutherland. Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, p. 144.Google Scholar
Read, H. H., 1948. Granites and Granites. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., xxviii, 1–19.Google Scholar
Sederholm, J. J., 1907. Om Granit och Gneis (English Summary). Bull. Geol. Comm. Finlande, xxiii, 102, 110.Google Scholar