Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:58:03.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A global Chitinozoa biozonation for the Silurian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. Verniers ,
V. Nestor ,
F. Paris ,
P. Dufka ,
S. Sutherland  and
G. Van Grootel
J. Verniers
Affiliation:
Lab. Palaeontology, Dept. Geology & Pedology, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
V. Nestor
Affiliation:
Dept. Palaeozoic Geology, Institute of Geology, Estonian Academy of Sciences, 7 Estonia Avenue, EE0001 Tallinn, Estonia
F. Paris
Affiliation:
Université de Rennes I, U.R.A. 1364 CNRS, Lab. Paléontologie & Stratigraphie, Avenue du Général-Leclerc, Campus de Beaulieu, F-35042 Rennes Cedex, France
P. Dufka
Affiliation:
Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 131/3, 11800 Praha 1, Czech Republic
S. Sutherland
Affiliation:
Centre for Palynological Studies, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield SI 3JD, UK
G. Van Grootel
Affiliation:
Lab. Palaeontology, Dept. Geology & Pedology, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S8, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A global Chitinozoan biozonation for the Silurian Period is proposed. Each biozone is an interval range defined by the first occurrence of an index species, selected from well-defined species with a relatively short biostratigraphic range. To be included in the scheme, index species must have been recorded from at least two major Silurian palaeocontinents where usable Chitinozoa assemblages have been studied, that is, Avalonia—Baltica (which had already undergone collision by the Silurian), Laurentia, Gondwana and Southern China. Seventeen biozones are identified with seven in the Llandovery: the fragilis, postrobusta, electa, maennili, alargada, dolioliformis and longicollis biozones; four in the Wenlock: the margaritana, cingulata, pachycephala and lycoperdoides biozones; three in the Ludlow: the elongata, philipi and barrandei biozones; and three in the Přídolí: the kosovensis, elegans and superba biozones. Chronostratigraphic calibration is partly provided by reference to the range of the appropriate Chitinozoa index species in the global stratotype sections and points (GSSP) of the Silurian series, e.g. in Bohemia (Czech Republic) for the Přídolí and the Welsh Borderland in England for the Ludlow and part of the Wenlock. When this information was not available, independent biostratigraphic control was provided by calibration with graptolite biozones or in a few cases, conodont or trilobite biozonal schemes. The index and most characteristic species of each biozone are illustrated and their total stratigraphie range provided.

Type
Research Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 132 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 651 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achab, A., 1981. Biostratigraphie par les Chitinozoaires de l’ Ordovicien supérieur—Silurien inférieur de l’ Ile d’ Anticosti, Résultats préliminaires. In Subcommission on Silurian Stratigraphy, Ordovician-Silurian Boundary Working Group. Field Meeting, Anticosti-Gaspé 1981, Vol. II, Stratigraphy and Paleontology (ed. Lesperance, P. J.), pp. 143–57.Google Scholar
Achab, A., 1989. Ordovician chitinozoan zonation of Quebec and western Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology 63, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achab, A., & Asselin, E., 1993. Upper Silurian and Lower Devonian chitinozoan microfaunas in the Chaleurs Group, Eastern Canada. Special Papers in Palaeontology 48, 7–15.Google Scholar
Al-Ameri, T. K., 1989. Chitinozoa of the Tanezzuft and Acacus Formations, Libya. Iraqi Journal of Sciences 30, 203–42.Google Scholar
Aldridge, R. J., Dorning, K. J., Hill, P. J., Richardson, J. B., & Siveter, D. J., 1979. Microfossil distribution in the Silurian of Britain and Ireland. In The Caledonides of the British Isles reviewed (eds Harris, A. L., Holland, C. H. and Leake, B. E.), pp. 433–8. Geological Society, London, Special Publication no. 8.Google Scholar
Aldridge, R. J., Jeppsson, L., & Dorning, K. J., 1993. Early Silurian oceanic episodes and events. Journal of the Geological Society, London 150, 501–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asselin, E., Achab, A., & Bourque, P. A., 1989. Chitinozoaires du Silurien inférieur dans la région de la Baie des Chaleurs en Gaspésie, Québec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 26, 2435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaise, J., Bouyx, E., Degardin, J. M., Goujet, D., Le menn, J., & Paris, F., 1990. Données biostratigraphiques nouvelles sur le Silurien de la Zone de Meguma en Nouvelle-Écosse (Appalaches septentrionales, Canada). Comptes rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences de Paris 310, 787–93.Google Scholar
Cramer, F. H., 1967. Chitinozoans of a composite section of Upper Llandoverian to basal Lower Gedinnian sediments in northern Leon, Spain. A preliminary report. Bulletin de la Société Beige de Géologie, de Paléontologie et d’ Hydrologie 75, 69–129.Google Scholar
Cramer, F. H., 1969. Possible implications for Silurian paleogeography from phytoplankton assemblages of the Rose Hill and Tuscarora Formations of Pennsylvania. Journal of Paleontology 43, 485–91.Google Scholar
Cramer, F. H., 1970. Acritarchs and Chitinozoans from the Silurian Ross Brook Formation, Nova Scotia. Journal of Geology 78, 745–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, F. H., & Diez, M., 1978. Iberian Chitinozoans. 1. Introduction and summary of Pre-Devonian data. Palinologia Num. ext. 1, 149–201.Google Scholar
Cramer, F. H., Diez, M., & Cuerda, A. J., 1974. Late Silurian chitinozoans and acritarchs from Cochabamba, Bolivia. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1974, 1–12.Google Scholar
De Bock, F., 1982. Présence de chitinozoaires dans le passage siluro-dévonien de la Montagne Noire sud-orientale (Hérault, France). Géobios 15, 845–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degardin, J. M., & Paris, F., 1978. Présence de Chitinozoaires dans les calcaires siluro-dévoniens de la Sierra Negra (Pyrénées centrales espagnoles). Géobios 11, 769–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deunff, J., Lefort, J. P., & Paris, F., 1971. Le microplancton ludlovien des formations immergées des Minquiers (Manche) et sa place dans la distribution du patéoplancton silurien. Bulletin de la Société Géologique et Minéralogique de Bretagne 3, 9–28.Google Scholar
Diez, M. D. C. R., & Cramer, F. H., 1978. Iberian chitinozoans. II. Lower Devonian forms (La Vid shales and equivalents). Palinologia Num. ext. 1, 203–17.Google Scholar
Dorning, K. J., 1981. Silurian Chitinozoa from the type Wenlock and Ludlow of Shropshire, England. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 34, 205–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorning, K. J., 1983. Palynology and stratigraphy of the Much Wenlock Limestone Formation of Dudley, Central England. Mercian Geologist 9, 31–40.Google Scholar
Dufka, P., 1992. Lower Silurian Chitinozoans of the Prague Basin (Barrandian, Czechoslovakia). Preliminary results. Revue de Micropaléontologie 35, 117–26.Google Scholar
Dufka, P., & Fatka, O., 1993. Chitinozoans and acritarchs from the Ordovician—Silurian boundary of the Prague Basin, Czech Republic. Special Papers in Palaeontology 48, 17–28.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1931. Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs. I. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 13, 74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1934. Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs. III. und Neue Mikrofossilien des böhmischen Silurs. I. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 16, 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1937. Neue Mikrofossilien des baltischen Silurs. IV. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 19, 217–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1959. Neotypen baltischer Silur — Chitinozoen und neue Arten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 114, 291–316.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1964. Mikrofossilien aus dem Silur Gotlands. Chitinozoen. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 120, 308–42.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1971. Weitere Mikrofossilien aus dem Beyrichienkalk (Silur). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 8, 449–60.Google Scholar
Eisenack, A., 1977. Mikrofossilien in organischer Substanz aus den Middle Nodular Beds (Wenlock) von Dudley, England. Neues Jahrbuch für Ceologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1977 (1), 25–35.Google Scholar
Gailite, L. K., Ulst, R. Z., & Jakovleva, V. J., 1987. Silurian stratotypical and typical sections in Latvia (in Russian). Zinatne 112, 1–142.Google Scholar
Geng, L., & Cai, X., 1988. Sequences of Llandoverian Chitinozoans in Yangzi region. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 27, 249–57.Google Scholar
Geng, L., Grahn, Y., & Qian, Z., 1987. Llandoverian Chitinozoa from Borehole DI-2 AT Daduo, Xinghua, Jiangsu. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 26, 728–36.Google Scholar
Geng, L., & Li, Z. 1984. Chitinozoans from the Yulongsi Formation of Qujing, Yunnan. Acta Micropalaeontologica Sinica 1, 100–5.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 1982. Chitinozoophoran palaeoecology in the Ordovician of Öland. Sveriges Ceologiska Undersökning, Ser. C 792, 1–17.Google Scholar
Grahn, Y., 1985. Llandoverian and early Wenlockian Chitinozoa from southern Ohio and northern Kentucky U.S.A. Palynology 9, 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahn, Y., & Paris, F., 1992. Age and correlation of the Trombetas Group, Amazonas Basin, Brazil. Revue de Micropaléontologie 35, 197–209.Google Scholar
Grignani, D., 1967. Correlation with Chitinozoa in the Devonian and Silurian in some Tunisian well samples. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 5, 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J. P., Paris, F., & Richardson, J. B., 1985. Silurian palynomorphs. In The Palynostratigraphy of northeast Libya (eds Thusu, B. G. and Owens, B.), pp. 27–48. Journal of Micropalaeontology 4.Google Scholar
Holland, C. H., & Bassett, M. G., (eds) 1989. A Global Standard for the Silurian System. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, Geological Series no. 10, 325 pp.Google Scholar
Jaeger, H., 1981. Comments on the graptolite chronology of Gotland. Sveriges Geologiska undersökning Rapporter och meddelander 25, 12.Google Scholar
Jaglin, J. C., & Massa, D., 1985. Biostratigraphie des chitinozoaires du Přídolí de Libye. E.U.G. III Strasbourg, Terra Cognita 5, p. 262.Google Scholar
Jaglin, J. C., & Paris, F. 1992. Exemples de tératologie chez les Chitinozoaires du Přídolí de Libye et implications sur la signification biologique du groupe. Lethaia 25, 151–64.Google Scholar
Jardiné, S., & Yapaudjan, L., 1968. Lithostratigraphie et palynologie du Dévonien—Gothlandien gréseux du bassin de Polignac (Sahara). Revue de l’ Institut Français du Pétrole 13, 439–69.Google Scholar
Jeppsson, L., & Männik, P., 1993. High-resolution correlations between Gotland and Estonia near the base of the Wenlock. Terra Nova 5, 348–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaljo, D., 1990. The Silurian of Estonia. In Field Meeting Estonia, 1990. An Excursion Guidebook (eds Kaljo, D. and Nestor, H.), pp. 21–6. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Kříž, J., 1992. Silurian Field Excursions: Prague Basin (Barrandian), Bohemia (ed. Bassett, M.G.). Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, Geological Series no. 13, 111 pp.Google Scholar
Kříž, J., Jaeger, H., Paris, F., & Schönlaub, H. P., 1986. Přídolí — the Fourth subdivision of the Silurian system. Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 129, 291–360.Google Scholar
Kříž, J., Dufka, P., Jaeger, H., & Schönlaub, H. P., 1993. The Wenlock—Ludlow boundary in the Prague Basin (Bohemia). Jahrbuch der Geologischen Bundesanstalt 136, 809–39.Google Scholar
Laufeld, S. 1974. Silurian Chitinozoa from Gotland. Fossils and Strata 5, 1–130.Google Scholar
Laufeld, S., Bergström, J., & Warren, P.J., 1975. The boundary between the Silurian Cyrtograptus and Colonus Shales in Skane, southern Sweden. Geologiska Föreningens I Stockholm Förhandlingar 97, 207–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwye, S., Van Grootel, G., & Verniers, J. 1992. Stratigraphy of the type locality of the? Late Wenlock/Early Ludlow Mont Godart Formation and the Early Ludlow Ronquières Formation, Brabant Massif, Belgium. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique 115, 307–31.Google Scholar
Mabillard, J. E., & Aldridge, R. J., 1985. Microfossils distribution across the base of the Ludlow Series in the type area. Palaeontology 28, 89–100.Google Scholar
Magloire, L., 1967. Etude stratigraphique, par la palynologie, des dépôts argilo-gréseux du Silurien et du Dévonien inférieur dans la région du Grand Erg occidental (Sahara algérien). International Symposium on the Devonian system, II, Calgary, pp. 473–91.Google Scholar
Martin, F., 1974. Ordovicien supérieur et Silurien inférieur à Deerlijk (Belgique). Palynofaciès et Microfaciès. Mémoire de l’ Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique 174, 1–71.Google Scholar
Nestor, V., 1980 a. New Chitinozoan species from the Lower Llandoverian of Estonia [in Russian with English translation]. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised 29, 98–107.Google Scholar
Nestor, V., 1980 b. Middle Llandoverian Chitinozoans from Estonia [in Russian with English translation]. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised 29, 136–42.Google Scholar
Nestor, V., 1982. New Wenlockian species of Conochitina from Estonia [in Russian with English translation]. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised 31, 105–10.Google Scholar
Nestor, V., 1984. Distribution of Chitinozoans in the Late Llandoverian Rumba Formation (Pentamerus oblongus beds) of Estonia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 43, 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nestor, V., 1990. Silurian Chitinozoans. In Field Meeting Estonia, 1990. An Excursion Guidebook (eds Kaljo, D. and Nestor, H.), pp. 80–3. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Nestor, V. 1994. Early Silurian chitinozoans of Estonia and North Latvia. Academia 4, 1–163.Google Scholar
Nōlvak, J., & Grahn, Y., 1993. Ordovician chitinozoan zones from Baltoscandia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 79, 245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obut, A. M., 1973. On the geographical distribution, comparative morphology, ecology, phylogeny and systematical position of the Chitinozoa (in Russian). In Morfologiia i ekologiia vodnykh [Morphology and Ecology of Aquatic Organisms] (eds Betektina, O.A. and Zhuravleva, I. T.), pp. 72–84. USSR Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Transactions of the Institute of Geology and Geophysics 169.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1981. Les Chitinozoaires dans le Paléozoïque du sud-ouest de l' Europe (Cadre géologique—Étude systématique—Biostratigraphie). Mémoires de la Société Géologique et Minéralogique de Bretagne 26, 1–412.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1986. Les Chitinozoaires. In Le Groupe de Liévin, Přídolí—Lochkovien de l’ Artois (N. France) (ed. Racheboeuf, P.), pp. 55–61. Biostratigraphie du Paléozoique 3.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1988. Late Ordovician and Early Silurian Chitinozoans from central and southern Cyrenaica. In Subsurface Palynostratigraphy of Northeast Libya (eds El Arnauti, A., Owens, B. and Thusu, B.), pp. 61–71. Benghazi: Garyounis University Publications.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1989. Chitinozoans. In A Global Standard for the Silurian System (eds Holland, C. H. and Bassett, M. G.), pp. 280–4. Cardiff: National Museum of Wales, Geological Series no. 9.Google Scholar
Paris, F., 1990. The Ordovician chitinozoan biozones of the Northern Gondwana domain. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 66, 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., 1995. Chitinozoan biostratigraphy and paleobiology. In Palynology and Stratigraphy (eds Jansonius, J. and McGregor, D. C.), Memoir of the American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation (in press).Google Scholar
Paris, F., & Grahn, Y., in press. Chitinozoa of the Silurian-Devonian boundary sections in Podolia, Ukraine. Palaeontology.Google Scholar
Paris, F., & Kříž, J., 1984. Nouvelles espèces de Chitinozoaires à la limite Ludlow—Přídolí en Tchécoslovaquie. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 43, 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, F., Laufeld, S., & Chlupáč, I. 1981. Chitinozoa of the Silurian—Devonian boundary stratotypes in Bohemia. Sveriges Ceologiska Undersökning Ser. Ca 51, 1–29.Google Scholar
Paris, F., & Le Hérissé, A., 1992. Palaeozoic in Western Brittany (Outline of the armorican geological history and geological intinerary in the Crozon Peninsula). Cahiers de Micropaléontologie 7, 5–28.Google Scholar
Paris, F., Verniers, J., Al-Hajri, S., & Al-Tayyar, H., 1995 (in press). Biostratigraphy and palaeogeographic affinities of Early Silurian chitinozoans from Central Saudi Arabia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racheboeuf, P., Le Hérissé, A., Paris, F., Babin, C., Guillocheau, F., Truyols-Massoni, M., & Suarezsoruco, R., 1993. Le Dévonien de Bolivie: biostratigraphie et chronostratigraphie. Comptes rendus de l' Académie des Sciences, Paris, II, 317, 795–802.Google Scholar
Rauscher, R., & Robardet, M., 1975. Les microfossiles (Acritarches, Chitinozoaires et spores) des couches de passage du Silurien au Dévonien dans le Cotentin (Normandie). Annales de la Société Géologique du Nord 95, 81–92.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. B., & Rasul, S. M., 1990. Palynofacies in a Late Silurian regressive sequence in the Welsh Borderland and Wales. Journal of the Geological Society, London 147, 675–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rombouts, L. P., 1982. Factors controlling the distribution of Chitinozoa in the Gleedon chronozone (Wenlockian) of northern Europe. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique 105, 259–71.Google Scholar
Schweineberg, J., 1987. Silurische Chitinozoen aus der Provinz Palencia (Kantabrisches Gebirge, N Spaniën). Göttinger Arbeiten zur Geologie und Paläontologie 33, 1–94.Google Scholar
Sutherland, S. J. E., 1994. Ludlow chitinozoans from the type area and adjacent regions. Palaeontographical Society Monograph, London 148, 1–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swire, P. H., 1990. New Chitinozoan taxa from the Lower Wenlock (Silurian) of the Welsh Borderlands, England. Micropalaeontology 9, 107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swire, P.H., 1993. The palynology of the Lower Wenlock of the Wenlock type area, Shropshire. Special Papers in Palaeontology 48, 97–109.Google Scholar
Taugourdeau, P., 1963. Étude de quelques espèces critiques de Chitinozoaires de la région d’ Edjeté et compléments à la faune locale. Revue de Micropaléontologie 6, 130–44.Google Scholar
Taugourdeau, P., & de Jekhowsky, B., 1960. Répartition et description des Chitinozoaires siluro-dévoniens de quelques sondages de la C.R.E.P.S., de la C.F.P.A. et de la S.N. Repal au Sahara. Revue de l’ Institut Français du Pétrole 15, 1199–1260.Google Scholar
The Subcommission on Silurian Stratigraphy 1995. Left hand column for correlation charts. Silurian Times, a Newsletter of the Silurian Subcommission 3, 7–8.Google Scholar
Tsegelnjuk, P. D., 1982. Silurian Chitinozoa from Podolia. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 160 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Umnova, N. I., 1976. Structural types of the prosome and operculum in the Chitinozoa and their association with genera and species. Paleontological Journal 4, 393–406.Google Scholar
Verniers, J. 1982. The Silurian Chitinozoa of the Mehaigne area (Brabant Massif, Belgium). Professional Paper, Belgium Geological Survey no. 192, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Verniers, J., & Van Grootel, G., 1991. Review of the Silurian in the Brabant Massif, Belgium. In Proceedings of the International Meeting on the Caledonides of the Midlands and the Brabant Massif (eds André, L., Herbosch, A., Vanguestaine, M. and Verniers, J.), pp. 163–93. Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique 114.Google Scholar
Vllleneuve, M., Diallo, M. C., Keleba, F., Kourouma, S., Paris, F., & Racheboeuf, P. R., 1989. Données patéontologiques nouvelles sur le Paléozoïque du Bassin Bové (Guinée, Afrique de l' Ouest): conséquences stratigraphiques. Comptes rendus de l’ Académie des Sciences de Paris 309, 1583–9.Google Scholar
White, D. E., Barron, H. F., Barnes, R. P., & Lintern, B. C., 1991. Biostratigraphy of late Llandovery (Telychian) and Wenlock turbiditic sequences in the SW Southern Uplands, Scotland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 62, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrona, R., 1980. Upper Silurian—Lower Devonian Chitinozoa from the subsurface of southeastern Poland. Palaeontologia Polonica 41, 103–65.Google Scholar