Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:04:47.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glacial facies associations in a Neoproterozoic back-arc setting, Zavkhan Basin, western Mongolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

J. F. Lindsay ,
M. D. Brasier ,
G. Shields ,
V. V. Khomentovsky  and
Y. A. Bat-Ireedui
J. F. Lindsay
Affiliation:
Australian Geological Survey Organisation, P. O. Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
M. D. Brasier
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Department, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR, UK
G. Shields
Affiliation:
Geological Institute Sonneggstrasse, Zürich, Switzerland
V. V. Khomentovsky
Affiliation:
United Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineralogy, Siberian Branch, Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, Russia
Y. A. Bat-Ireedui
Affiliation:
Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the MPR, Ulaan Baatar, Mongolia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diamictites, many of glacial origin, are globally distributed in the Neoproterozoic. Recently, two relatively thin diamictites in the Maikhan Uul Member at the base of the Neoproterozoic Tsagaan Oloom Formation from the Zavkhan Basin of western Mongolia have been identified as being of glacial origin. The Mongolian diamictites form a series of backstepping units within the transgressive systems tract of two major depositional sequences associated with sea-level changes. In each case the diamictites of the transgressive systems tract are abruptly overlain by deeper water, upward shoaling highstand systems tracts consisting of thinly bedded sandstones and shales in sequence 1 and thinly bedded, dark carbonates in sequence 3. The fact that the sequences conform closely to depositional models established at other localities suggests that all are related to major ice ages and that the depositional sequences they have generated provide a valuable tool for global correlation in this part of the stratigraphic column. Available stratigraphic and isotope geochemical information presented by Brasier et al. (1996, this issue) suggests that both diamictites are likely to be of Sturtian age. A riftogenic setting and Sturtian age for the diamictites provide a link with eastern Australia and western America. It is possible, therefore, that these diamictites formed during the breakup of a supercontinental assembly including Siberia, Australia and Laurentia c. 750–725 Ma BP.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 133 , Issue 4 , July 1996 , pp. 391 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boulton, G. S., 1978. Boulder shapes and grain-size distribution of debris as indicators of transport paths through a glacier and till genesis. Sedimentology 25, 773–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasier, M. D., Shields, G., Kuleshov, V. N. & Zhegallo, V. A., 1996. Integrated chemo- and biostratigraphic calibration of early animal evolution: Neoproterozoic—early Cambrian of southwest Mongolia. Geological Magazine 133, 445–85.Google Scholar
Brodzikowski, K. & van Loon, A. J., 1987. A systematic classification of glacial and periglacial environments, facies and deposition. Earth-Science Reviews 24, 297–381.Google Scholar
Chumakov, N. M., 1981. Upper Proterozoic glaciogenic rocks and their stratigraphic significance. Precambrian Research 15, 373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chumakov, N. M., 1993. The middle Siberian glaciohorizon of the Riphean. Stratigraphyia. Geologiya Korrelyatsiya 1, 21–31 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Derry, L. A., Kaufman, A. J. & Jacobsen, S. B., 1992. Sedimentary cycling and environmental change in the Late Proterozoic: Evidence from stable and radiogenic isotopes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56, 1317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorjnamjaa, D., 1989. The Precambrian stratigraphy of Mongolia. Novosibirsk, 32 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Dorjnamjaa, D., 1991. Precambrian and Cambrian deposits in Mongolia and latest Precambrian phosphorites. IGCP Project 303: Precambrian and Cambrian event stratigraphy, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Dorjnamjaa, D., Bat-Ireedui, Y. A., Dashdavaa, Z. & Solemaa, D., 1993. Guidebook for excursion Precambrian—Cambrian geology Khasagt-Khavrhan Ridge, Gobi-Allay Province, Mongolia. Geological Institute of the Mongolian Academy of Science, 36 pp.Google Scholar
Dorjnamjaa, D. & Bat-Ireedui, Y. A., 1991. The Precambrian of Mongolia. Ulaan Baatar, 182 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Eyles, C. H., 1994. Intertidal boulder pavements in the northeastern gulf of Alaska and their geological significance. Sedimentary Geology 88, 161–73.Google Scholar
Eyles, C. H., Eyles, N. & Miall, A. D., 1985. Models of glaciomarine sedimentation and their application to the interpretation of ancient glacial sequences. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 51, 15–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyles, N., 1993. Earth’s glacial record and its tectonic setting. Earth-Science Reviews 35, 1–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, I. J., Bradby, L. & Spiro, B., 1993. Carbonate diagenesis in ice. Geology 21, 901–4.Google Scholar
Gibsher, A. S. & Khomentovsky, V. V., 1990. The Section of the Tsagaan Oloom and Bayan Gol Formations of the Vendian—Lower Cambrian in the Dzabkhan zone of Mongolia. In The Late Precambrian and Early Paleozoic of Siberia (eds Khomentovsky, V. V., Gibsher, A. S., and Karlova, G. A.), pp. 79–91. Novosibirsk: Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 168 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Gibsher, A. S., Bat-Ireedui, Y. A., Balakhonov, I. G. & Efremenko, D. E., 1991. The Bayan Gol reference section of the Vendian—Lower Cambrian in central Mongolia (subdivision and correlation). In Late Precambrian and Early Palaeozoic of Siberia. Siberian Platform and its framework (ed. Khomentovsky, V. V.), pp. 107–20. Novosibirsk: Ob’edinennyy Institut Geologii, Geofiziki i Mineralogii, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 151 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Hambrey, M. J. & Harland, W. B., 1985. The Late Proterozoic glacial era. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 51, 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. F., 1991. Did the breakout of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside-out? Science 252, 1409–12.Google Scholar
Ilyin, A. V., 1990. Proterozoic supercontinent, its latest Precambrian rifting, breakup, dispersal into smaller continents and subsidence of their margins: Evidence from Asia. Geology 18, 1231–4.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, A. J., Jacobsen, S. B. & Knoll, A. H., 1993. The Vendian record of Sr and C isotopic variations in seawater: Implications for tectonics and paleoclimate. Earth Planetary Science Letters 120, 409–30.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. J. & Knoll, A. H., 1995. Neoproterozoic variations in the C-isotopic composition of seawater: stratigraphic and biogeochemical implications. Precambrian Research 73, 27–49.Google Scholar
Kennard, J. M. & Lindsay, J. F., 1991. Sequence stratigraphy of the latest Proterozoic—Cambrian Pertaoorrta Group, northern Amadeus Basin. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia, Bulletin 236, 171–94.Google Scholar
Khomentovsky, V. V. & Gibsher, A. S., 1996. The Neo proterozoic— lower Cambrian in northern Govi-Altay, western Mongolia: regional setting, lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy. Geological Magazine 133, 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larter, R. D. & Barker, P. F., 1991. Neogene interaction of tectonic and glacial processes at the Pacific margin of the Antarctic Peninsula. In Sedimentation, Tectonics and Eustacy, Sea-level Changes at the Continental Margin (ed. Macdonald, D. I. M.), pp. 165–86. International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication no. 12.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. F., 1970. Depositional environment of Paleozoic glacial rocks in the central Transantarctic Mountains. Geological Society of American Bulletin 81, 1149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, J. F., 1987. Sequence stratigraphy and depositional controls in Late Proterozoic—Early Cambrian sediments of Amadeus Basin, central Australia. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 71, 1387–403.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. F., 1989. Depositional controls on glacial facies associations in a basinal setting, Late Proterozoic, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 73, 205–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, J. F. (ed.) 1993. Geological Atlas of the Amadeus Basin. Australian Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra, Australia, 25 plates.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. F., Kennard, J. M. & Southgate, P. N., 1993. Application of Sequence Stratigraphy in an Intracratonic Setting, Amadeus Basin, central Australia. In Sequence stratigraphy and facies associations (eds Posamentier, H. W., Summerhayes, C. P., Haq, B. U., and Allen, G. P.), pp. 605–31. IAS Special Publication no. 18.Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. F, Brasier, M. D., Dorjnamjaa, D., Goldring, R., Kruse, P. & Wood, R. A., 1996. Facies and sequence controls on the appearance of the Cambrian biota in southwestern Mongolia: implications for Precambrian—Cambrian boundary. Geological Magazine 133, 417–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, C. McA., Li, Z. X., McElhinny, M. W., Meert, J. G. & Park, J. K., 1993. Paleomagnetic constraints on timing of the Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia and the Cambrian formation of Gondwana. Geology 21, 880–92.Google Scholar
Smith, L. H., Kaufman, A. J., Knoll, A. H. & Link, P. K., 1994. Chemostratigraphy of predominantly siliciclastic Neoproterozoic succession: a case study of the Pocatello Formation and lower Brigham Group, Idaho, USA. Geological Magazine 131, 301–14.Google Scholar
Stump, E., Miller, J. M. G., Korsch, R. J. & Edgerton, D. G., 1988. Diamictite from Nimrod Glacier area, Antarctica: Possible Proterozoic glaciation on the seventh continent. Geology 16, 225–8.Google Scholar