Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:12:33.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The geochemistry of the Plenus Marls at Dover, England: evidence of fluctuating oceanographic conditions and of glacial control during the development of the Cenomanian–Turonian δ13C anomaly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

C. V. Jeans
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.
D. Long
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, U.K.
M. A. Hall
Affiliation:
Godwin Laboratory for Quaternary Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RS, U.K.
D. J. Bland
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, U.K.
C. Cornford
Affiliation:
Integrated Geochemical Interpretation Ltd, Bideford, Devon EX39 5HE, U.K.

Abstract

The sediments and organic calcite geochemistry (Fe2+, Mn2+, Sr, Mg, δ18O, δ13C) of the Plenus Marls at Dover (southeast England) reflect the changing oceanographic conditions associated with the development of the late Cenomanian-early Turonian S1SC excursion.

The Plenus Marls of Dover consist of five marl-chalk couplets with a total thickness of up to 3 m. The sediments were deposited in an increasingly shallowing sea during a major regressional phase of the Chalk Sea over Europe. Each marl horizon was deposited in slightly cooler water of lower productivity and higher energy level than the overlying chalk, and represents a phase of enhanced regression. Inoceramus prisms and shell fragments from the marls have enhanced Mg values, whereas all the biogenic calcite from the chalks is enriched in Fe2+. The high clay content of the Plenus Marls probably originated from the post-depositional argillization of unstable silicate detritus (possibly of volcanoclastic origin) introduced into the regressing sea by rejuvenated river systems. The δ18O values of individual planktic and benthic foraminifera species have been lightened by diagenetic reaction; however they demonstrate (1) the presence of a constant temperature gradient in the water column with warmer surface waters relative to the bottom waters, and (2) the association of a marked temperature drop with the appearance of Jefferies' cold water occidental fauna and the development of a Mn2+ anomaly (Bed 5) in the average calcite skeletons of all particle size fractions. The δ13C values of individual planktic and benthic foraminifera species show that a normal oceanic gradient existed except at two levels (Beds 3, 5), where this is reversed with heavier values shown by the benthic forms. The normal δ13C gradient steepened rapidly as the water shallowed and the δ13C excursion reached maximum values. Dysaerobic and anaerobic water conditions were completely absent and the level of oxygenation (macrofaunal diversity) increased in parallel with the shallowing and the enhanced δ13C excursion.

Comparison with the Plenus Marls section at Flixton (east Yorkshire), which shows evidence of restricted faunas and deposition under anoxic conditions (black bands rich in terrestrial organic matter), demonstrates that between these two localities there is unequivocal correlation of the δ13C excursion and the temperature drop associated with Jefferies' cold water occidental fauna. Anomalous geochemical features of the Dover Plenus Marls are explained by the redeposition of Flixton-type coccolith-rich chalk (very low Fe2+ content) and by the occasional introduction of cold northern bottom waters enriched in 13C.

The status of the Cenomanian-Turonian oceanic anoxic event and its supporting evidence is discussed and is considered to be untenable on present evidence. An alternative hypothesis based upon a glacial mechanism is put forward; this is supported by evidence of widespread regression, restricted ocean circulation, lower ocean temperatures, enhanced input of terrestrial organic matter, and the presence of dropstones.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, M. A., Dean, W. E. & Pratt, L. M. 1988. Geochemical and climatic effects of increased marine organic carbon burial at the Cenomanian/Turonian boundary. Nature 335, 714–17.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. A., Schlanger, S. O. & Jenkyns, H. C. 1987. The Cenomanian-Turonian oceanic anoxic event. II. Palaeoceanographic controls on organic matter production and preservation. In Marine Petroleum Source Rocks (eds Brooks, J. and Fleet, A.), pp. 401–20. Geological Society Special Publication no. 26.Google Scholar
Barnard, P. C., Collins, A. G. & Cooper, B. S. 1981. Identification and distribution of kerogen facies in a source rock horizon - examples from the North Sea basin. In Organic Maturation Studies and Fossil Fuel Exploration (ed. Brooks, J.), pp. 271–82. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1980. On chalk, globigerina ooze and aragonite mud. In Andros Island, Chalk and Oceanic Oozes (eds Jeans, C. V. and Rawson, P. F.), Yorkshire Geological Society Occasional Publication No. 5, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Bralower, T. J. 1988. Calcareous nannofossil bio-stratigraphy and assemblages of the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary interval: implications for the origin and timing of oceanic anoxia. Paleoceanography 3, 275316.Google Scholar
Corfield, R. M., Hall, M. A. & Braiser, M.D. 1990. Isotope evidence for foraminiferal habitats during the development of the Cenomanian/Turonian oceanic anoxic event. Geology 18, 175–8.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, C. 1990. Source rocks and hydrocarbons of the North Sea. In Introduction to the Petroleum Geology of the North Sea, 3rd ed. (ed. Glennie, K.), pp. 294361. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dean, W. E., Arthur, M. A. & Claypool, G. E. 1986. Depletion of 13C in Cretaceous marine organic matter: source, diagenetic or environmental signal? Marine Geology 70, 119–58.Google Scholar
Dibley, G. E. 1910. Excursion to Merstham and Betch-worth. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 21, 483–6.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, P. & Marshall, J. D. 1989. Isotopic variation in rhythmically bedded chalks: paleotemperature variation in the Upper Cretaceous. Geology 17, 842–5.Google Scholar
Double, I. S. 1931. Some boulders from the Chalk of Betchworth. Geological Magazine 68, 6571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, R. G. & Savin, S. M. 1975. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses of Tertiary and Cretaceous microfossils from Shatsky Rise and other sites in the North Pacific Ocean. In Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 33, pp. 509–20. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Emerson, S., Cranston, R. E. & Liss, P. S. 1979. Redox species in a reducing fjord: equilibrium and kinetic considerations. Deep Sea Research 26A, 859–78.Google Scholar
Emerson, S., Jacobs, L. & Tebo, B. 1983. The behaviour of trace metals in marine anoxic waters: solubilities at the oxygen–hydrogen sulfide interface. In Trace Metals in Sea Water (eds Wong, C. S. et al. ), pp. 571608. NATO Conference Series IV, Vol. 9. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, S., Kalhorn, S., Jacobs, L., Tebo, B. M., Nealson, K. H. & Rosson, R. A. 1982. Environmental oxidation rate of Mn(11): bacterial catalysis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 46, 1073–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espitalie, J., Deroo, G. & Marquis, F. 1985. La pyrolyse Rock-Eval et ses applications. Revue Institut française du Petrole 40, 563–79, 755–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrimond, P., Eglinton, G., Brassell, S. C. & Jenkyns, H. C. 1990. The Cenomanian/Turonian anoxic event in Europe: an organic geochemical study. Marine and Petroleum Geology 7, 7589.Google Scholar
Frakes, L. A. & Francis, J. E. 1988. A guide to Phanerozoic cold polar climates from high-latitude ice-rafting in the Cretaceous. Nature 333, 31–4.Google Scholar
Godwin-Austen, R. 1858. On a boulder of granite found in the White Chalk near Croydon, and the extraneous rocks from that formation. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 14, 252–66.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. M. 1989. Sea-level changes in the British region during the Late Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 100, 565–94.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. M. & Kauffman, E. G. 1979. The great transgressions of the Late Cretaceous. Journal of the Geological Society, London 136, 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haq, B. U. 1984. Palaeoceanography: a synoptic overview of 200 million years of ocean history. In Marine Geology and Oceanography of the Arabian Sea and Coastal Pakistan (eds Haq, B. U. and Milliman, J. D.), pp. 201–31. Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Hart, M. B. & Biggs, P. J. 1981. Anoxic events in the late Cretaceous chalk seas of north-west Europe. In Microfossils From Recent and Fossil Shelf Seas (eds Neale, J. W. and Brasier, M. D.), pp. 177–85. Ellis Harwood for the British Micropalaeritological Society.Google Scholar
Hawkes, L. 1951. The erratics of the English Chalk. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 62, 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. M., Popp, B. N., Takigiku, R. & Johnson, M. W. 1989. An isotopic study of biogeochemical relationships between carbonates and organ carbon in the Greenhorn Formation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53, 2961–72.Google Scholar
Herbin, J. P., Montadert, L., Müller;, C., Gomez, R., Thurow, J. & Wiedmann, J. 1986. Organic-rich sedimentation at the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary in oceanic and coastal basins in the North Atlantic and Tethys. In North Atlantic Palaeoceanography (eds Summerhayes, C. P. and Shackleton, N. J.), pp. 389422. Geological Society Special Publication No. 21.Google Scholar
Hilbrecht, H. & Hoefs, J. 1986. Geochemical and palaentological studies of the 13C anomaly in Boreal and North Tethyan Cenomanian–Turonian sediments in Germany and adjacent areas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 53, 169–89.Google Scholar
Jarvis, I., Carson, G. A., Cooper, M. K. E., Hart, M. B., Leary, P. N., Tocher, B. A., Horne, D. & Rosenfeld, A. 1988 a. Microfossil assemblages and the Cenomanian–Turonian (late Cretaceous) oceanic anoxic event. Cretaceous Research 9, 3103.Google Scholar
Jarvis, I., Carson, G., Hart, M. B., Leary, P. N. & Tocher, B. 1988 b. The Cenomanian–Turonian (late Cretaceous) anoxic event in S.W. England: evidence from Hooken Cliffs near Beer, S.E. Devon. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 18, 147–64.Google Scholar
Jeans, C. V. 1968. The origin of the montmorillonite of the European chalk with special reference to the Lower Chalk of England. Clay Minerals 7, 311–29.Google Scholar
Jeans, C. V. 1980. Early submarine lithification in the Red Chalk and Lower Chalk of East England: a bacterial control model and its implications. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 43, 81157.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S. 1963. The stratigraphy of the Actinocamax plenus subzone (Turonian) in the Anglo-Paris Basin. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 74, 133.Google Scholar
Jones, R. W. 1987. Organic facies. In Advances in Petroleum Geochemistry, vol. 2. (eds Brooks, J. and Welte, D.), pp. 190. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jukes-Browne, A. J. & Hill, W. 1903. The Cretaceous Rocks of Britain vol. II. The Lower and Middle Chalk of England. Memoir of the Geological Survey, U.K. 568 pp.Google Scholar
Kemper, E. 1987. Das Klima der Kreide-Zeit. Geologisches Jahrbuch, Series A, 96, 5185.Google Scholar
Koutsoukos, E. A. M., Leary, P. N. & Hart, M. B. 1990. Latest Cenomanian–Turonian low-oxygen tolerant benthonic foraminifera: a case study from the Sergipe basin (N.E. Brazil) and the Western Anglo–Paris basin (Southern England). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 77, 145–77.Google Scholar
Langford, F. F. & Blanc-Valleron, M.-M. 1990. Interpreting Rock-Eval pyrolysis data using graphs of pyrolizable hydrocarbons vs. total organic carbon. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 74, 799804.Google Scholar
M. B., , Horne, D., Jarvis, I., Rosenfeld, A. & Tocher, B. A. 1989. The biotic response to the late Cenomanian oceanic anoxic event; integrated evidence from Dover, S.E. England. Journal of the Geological Society, London 146, 311–17.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. & Epstein, S. 1954. Palaeotemperatures of the post-Aptian Cretaceous as determined by the oxygen isotope method. Journal of Geology 62, 207–48.Google Scholar
Martin, E. A. 1897. Foreign boulders in the Chalk. Geological Magazine 4, 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, J. W. & Mackenzie, F. T. 1990. Geochemistry of sedimentary carbonates. Developments in Sedimentology 48, 202–10.Google Scholar
Pedersen, T. F. & Calvert, S. E. 1990. Anoxia vs. Productivity: What controls the formation of organic carbon-rich sediments and sedimentary rocks. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 74, 454–66.Google Scholar
Peryt, D. & Wyrwicka, K. 1991. The Cenomanian-Turonian oceanic anoxic event in S.E. Poland. Cretaceous Research 12, 6580.Google Scholar
Pirrie, D. & Marshall, J. D. 1990. High-paleolatitude Late Cretaceous paleotemperatures; new data from James Ross Island, Antarctica. Geology 18, 31–4.Google Scholar
Pomerol, B. 1983. Geochemistry of the Late Cenomanian-Early Turonian Chalks of the Paris Basin: Manganese and Carbon isotopes in Carbonates as Palaeoceano-graphic Indicators. Cretaceous Research 4, 8593.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. M. 1985. Isotopic studies of organic matter and carbonate in rocks of the Greenhorn Marine Cycle. In Fine-grained Deposits and Biofacies of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway: Evidence of Cyclic Sedimentary Processes, Field Trip Guidebook, 4 (eds Pratt, L. M., Kauffman, E. G. and Zelt, F. B.), pp. 3848. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa (Oklahoma).Google Scholar
Pratt, L. M., Force, E. R. & Pomerol, B. 1991. Coupled manganese and carbon isotopic events in marine carbonates at the Cenomanian–Turonian boundary. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 61, 370–83.Google Scholar
Robinson, N. D. 1986. Lithostratigraphy of the Chalk Group of the North Downs, Southeast England. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association 97, 141–70.Google Scholar
Schlanger, S. O., Arthur, M. A., Jenkyns, H. C. & Scholle, P. A. 1987. The Cenomanian–Turonian oceanic anoxic event. I. Stratigraphy and distribution of organic carbon-rich beds and the marine 13C excursion. In Marine Petroleum Source Rocks (eds Brooks, J. and Fleet, A. J.), pp. 371–99. Geological Society Special Publication No. 16.Google Scholar
Scholle, P. A. & Arthur, M. A. 1980. Carbon isotope fluctuations in Cretaceous pelagic limestones: potential stratigraphic and petroleum exploration tool. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 64, 6787.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N. J., Corfield, R. M. & Hall, M. A. 1985. Stable isotope data and the ontogeny of Palaeocene planktonic foraminifera. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 15, 321–36.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. & Parrish, J. T. 1990. Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary palaeoclimates of northern high latitudes: a quantitative view. Journal of the Geological Society, London 147, 329–41.Google Scholar
Stach, E., Mackowsky, M.-TH., Teichmüller, M., Taylor, G. H., Chandra, D. & Teichmüller, T. 1982. Stack's Textbook of Coal Petrology, 3rd ed. Gebrüder Borntraeger. 535 pp.Google Scholar
Stebbing, W. P. D. 1897. On two boulders of granite from the Middle Chalk of Betchworth, Surrey. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, London 53, 213–20.Google Scholar
Tinsley, J. 1950. The determination of organic carbon in soils by dichromate mixtures. Transactions. 4th International Congress of Soil Science 1, 161–4.Google Scholar
Urey, H. C., Epstein, S., Lowenstam, H. A. & McKinney, C. R. 1951. Measurements of paleotemperatures and temperatures of the Upper Cretaceous of England, Denmark and south-eastern United States. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 62, 399416.Google Scholar
Walton, F. G. (ed.) 1974. Handbook of Marine Science, Vol. 1. CRC Press, Ohio, USA. 627 pp.Google Scholar
Wood, C. J. & Smith, E. G. 1978. Lithostratigraphical classification of the Chalk in North Yorkshire, Humberside and Lincolnshire. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 42, 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar