Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:48:47.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gastropoda from the Karroo Beds of Southern Rhodesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. R. Cox
L. R. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occurrence, very rare in Karroo rocks, of a gastropod species in the Lower Beaufort stage (Upper Permian) of Southern Rhodesia is recorded. It is a small form apparently related to species found in the Tartarian stage of the Russian Permian. These species have been described under extinct marine genera, but on account of their morphology and non-marine habitat this is thought to be inappropriate. The new species much resembles some representatives of the modern genus Hydrobia, not previously recognized in pre-Mesozoic rocks, and it has been decided to describe it as a new species, Hydrobia gondwanica.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 1953 , pp. 201 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LIST OF WORKS TO WHICH REFERENCE IS MADE

Bond, G., 1952. The Karroo System in Southern Rhodesia. Symposium sur les séries de Gondwana(XIXe Congr. géol. internat., Alger), 209–223.Google Scholar
Branson, C. C., 1948. Bibliographic index of Permian invertebrates. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. No. 26, 1049 pp.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., 1921. Essais de paléoconchologie comparée. Livr. 12. 348 pp.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R., 1936. Karroo lamellibranchia from Tanganyika Territory and Madagascar. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xcii, 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, E., 1911. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der deutschen Zechsteinschnecken. Jahrb. preuss. geol. Landesanst., xxx, 444–506.Google Scholar
Dollfus, G. F., 1912. Recherches critiques sur quelques genres et espèces d'Hydrobia vivants ou fossiles. Journ. Conchyl., lix, 179–270.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B., 1861. Die animalischen Ueberreste der Dyas. Dyas, i–xviii, 1–130.Google Scholar
Koken, E., 1898. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Gastropoden des süddeutschen Muschelkalkes. Abh. geol. Specialk. Elsass-Lothringen, n.F., Heft 2, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Knight, J. B., 1940. Gastropods of the Whitehorse Sandstone. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 51, 302–315.Google Scholar
Ludwig, R., 1861. Zur Palaeontologie des Ural's. Süsswasser-Conchylien aus dem Kalkstein des Rothliegenden von Kungur. Palaeonto-graphica, x, 24–27.Google Scholar
Lutkevich, E. M., 1937. Tartarian Stage. Abstr. Papers XVII Internat. Geol. Congr., Moscow and Leningrad, 99–100.Google Scholar
Nechaev, A., 1894. Die Fauna der permischen Ablagerungen des östlichen Theils des europäischen Russlands. Trud. obshch. Estest. Kazan, xxvii, 503 pp.Google Scholar
Pustovalov, L. V., 1937. [Conditions of Permian sedimentation.] Problems Soviet Geol., vii, 963–994.Google Scholar
Rennie, J. V. L., 1937. Fósseis da formação vulcânica dos Libombos. Moçambique Serv. Indúst. Minas e Geol. Bol. 1, 13–24.Google Scholar
Revunova, K. A., 1938. Some gastropods of the Tartarian Stage from the basin of the Sukhona and Mezen rivers. Ann. Central Geol. Prosp. Sci. Res. Mus., i, 66–74.Google Scholar